Now THERE'S a challenging project.
The answer, of course, remains "42".
Does this mean they are "Nearer My God To Thee"?
He wants to understand women? Heres a start:
Fly me to the moon
And let me play among the stars
Let me see what spring is like
On Jupiter and Mars
In other words hold my hand
In other words darling kiss me
Fill my life with song
And let me sing forevermore
You are all I hope for
All I worship and adore
In other words please be true
In other words I love you
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
We're just as close as we ever were.
We can't even see it.
Proof positive that he's finally lost it. Quantum mechanics and string theory are logical compared to women.
An important point that is given little attention.
I predict that when we find the key to the "last" door between us and understanding the universe, when we open it we will find........
another door.
Hawkins has been obsessed with the black hole phenomenon ever since he first gained his reputation many years ago. Perhaps, on some instinctive level, he thinks that an understanding of their true nature will unlock a wide range of universal mysteries.
However, I don't think he's done any groundbreaking work since he first burst onto the scene many years ago. This seems to be typical of many great mathematical thinkers from Newton to Einstein. They made all their great discoveries as young men and then seemed to burn out. Perhaps there is something genetic which happens as you age which makes it less likely that you can think outside the box when it comes to genius inspired leaps of logic.
He should stop thinking so much and get a life.
He'll be introducing the Twelve Girls Band.
The answer to it all is 42
We're not that close, scientifically speaking.
Modern Physics and Ancient Faith. Often invoked as justification for unbelief, in this book modern science provides the basis for an unusual and provocative affirmation of religious faith. A professor of theoretical particle physics at the University of Delaware, Stephen Barr deploys his scientific expertise to challenge the dogmas of naturalistic materialism and to assert his belief that nothing explains the order of the universe better than divine design. To be sure, Barr recognizes that Darwin's work has swept away the arguments of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century theologians, who traced the handiwork of God in birds, flowers, and seashells. But the old argument-from-design reemerges with new sophistication after Barr presses evolutionary theory for a plausible account of the origin of what quantum physics demands that is, a conscious observer and comes away with nothing but skepticism about the skeptics. Barr indeed relishes the irony of a skeptical logic of random chance that forces unbelievers who balk at one unobservable God to accept, on doctrinal faith, a myriad of unobservable worlds on which the matter-motion lottery has not produced the winning ticket of conscious intelligence. The absurdity grows even more palpable among astrophysicists who avoid acknowledging the human-friendly pattern in subatomic and cosmic architecture found in the observable universe only by theorizing the existence of an infinite number of unobservable universes in which sovereign randomness has dictated other and more hostile architectures. Neither religiously sectarian nor technically daunting, this book invites the widest range of readers to ponder the deepest kind of questions.
we already know: "In the beginning GOD...."