Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terror Links to Saddam's Inner Circle (newly revealed document)
FoxNews ^ | June 11, 2006 | Ray Robison

Posted on 06/11/2006 6:48:24 PM PDT by FairOpinion

What was the relationship between Saddam Hussein's inner circle and Islamic terrorists? A newly released document captured in Iraq, but never before seen by the public, offers glimmers of new insight at the Pentagon's Foreign Military Studies Office Web site. The FMSO is a research and analysis center under the U.S. Army's Training and Doctrine Command. This particular document mentions two men with similar names, each with ties to Pakistani religious schools known as madrassas, Jihad training camps, the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

This original translation by my translator-colleague, who goes by the nom de guerre of "Sammi," comes from a notebook kept by an Iraqi intelligence agent. It provides evidence of a cooperative, operational relationship agreed to at the highest levels of the Iraqi government and the Taliban. The notebook is lengthy and we will present it on the FOX News Web site in a series of postings. It deals extensively with meetings between Maulana Fazlur Rahman, an Al Qaeda/Taliban supporter, and Taha Yassin Ramadan, the former vice president of Iraq, and other unnamed Iraqi officials.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedairaq; blix; bush; bushwasright; fazlurrahman; gwot; hansblix; iraq; iraqalqaeda; maulanafazlurrahman; maulanarahman; prewardocs; prewarintelligence; rahman; ramadan; saddam; saddamterrorlink; taharamadan; tahayassinramadan; taliban; terrorism; terrorismwot; waronterror; wmd; wot; yassinramadan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last
To: Just mythoughts
"forged documents"

Good comment. The silence of Big Media on these disclosures is both fascinating and illustrative. If these were indeed forgeries, BM would have jumped all over it. What it means is that they've looked at these documents, and realized that it meant Bush was right about taking out Hussein. All their specious arguments against taking action have been destroyed. So they must ignore them or make light of them. Which I would do in their situation too. If I lacked integrity like they do.

101 posted on 06/12/2006 3:10:06 PM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

One of the conspirators in the WTC bombing in 1993 was an Iraqi named Abdul Rahman Yasin. After the bombing he went to Baghdad where he was given lodging and support by Hussein. What conclusions do you draw from that?


102 posted on 06/12/2006 3:18:04 PM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Bubba passed out rose colored glasses at every "event". He did nothing after 1993 when we were hit on our own soil. It was just another minor event which was over with a few deaths. No big deal to him. The Towers, the Cole...No big deal.

and buries the info that connects Oklahoma with jihadists, and brushes off the offers of Sudan to hand over OBL -

didn't want to actually work - had golf to play, and other 'in house' games to play - not to mention, he never did anything without checking the poll numbers with breakfast, If He actually DID something, his poll numbers might suffer...

and yet - he and Reno took time to burn women and children to death in Waco and pull a Gestapo raid on little Elian. Go figure

103 posted on 06/12/2006 4:25:52 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
The obviouse would be for the Whitehouse and DoD while in future press conferences to touch on it when the issue of press bias can be intruduced

Tony Snow should open with - "I'm sure all you have read the documents linking Saddam and Al Queda - and have lots of questions about them, so I will immediately turn the time over for your well thought out questions>"

"Hello? Hello? Any questions? One question?"

104 posted on 06/12/2006 4:31:05 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
"Hello? Hello? Any questions? One question?"
Cough cough. Still more silence. Scratch, thump...oh excuse me I dropped my pen Helen.
David, get your filthy little white hand away from my shoes.
Snow: OK folks. Guess that sort of ends today's WH press corps gathering. Hope to see you all at the next one. I shall bring up the same topic open for questions, like I will in every further one. See ya around bozos.
105 posted on 06/12/2006 5:24:40 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
I vote for using Cindy as one of the 72 "virgins" for the marauding Islamofacists.

Of course, she'd probably enjoy it too much.

After having their ways with Cindy and Helen Thomas, what else could the camelhumpers ask for?

106 posted on 06/12/2006 6:29:26 PM PDT by Thumper1960 (Politicians are like diapers. They need changed often, and for the same reasons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bookmark


107 posted on 06/12/2006 8:35:19 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

108 posted on 06/12/2006 10:04:18 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

SMOKING GUN ON TERRORISM AND IRAQ. INTERESTING.


109 posted on 06/12/2006 11:17:05 PM PDT by WOSG (Do your duty, be a patriot, support our Troops - VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Tony Snow should open with - "I'm sure all you have read the documents linking Saddam and Al Queda - and have lots of questions about them, so I will immediately turn the time over for your well thought out questions>"

"Hello? Hello? Any questions? One question?"


===

And he should do it too.


110 posted on 06/12/2006 11:36:58 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: driftless

The article makes a point that they found a document in Afghanistan and one in Iraq which corroborate each other.


111 posted on 06/12/2006 11:38:44 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: driftless
"Good comment. The silence of Big Media on these disclosures is both fascinating and illustrative. If these were indeed forgeries"

There was a thread about whether these documents are forged or not. It had to do with a Congressional oversight committee that had a 2 hours video of the meeting. I watched the entire thing and they questioned the guys from the Pentagon about possibly forgeries.

The short answer is that they are not forged. Before being released to the Harmony database the documents have been scrubbed many times (from the field to the Pentagon) for forgeries and if found to be fake, then they do not release them to the database for the public.

The only reason that they do not give any warranty to the contents is because it is simply impossible for them to validate the contents of some thousands of documents. But as for being fake, they are not.

Hope that helps a bit.

112 posted on 06/13/2006 12:30:39 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

This will be ALL OVER THE NEWS TONIGHT~!!!


wait... this is a few days old...where was it?


113 posted on 06/13/2006 1:05:09 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Bio-Chemical Weapons & Saddam: A History.
114 posted on 06/13/2006 2:37:28 PM PDT by PsyOp (The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante; FreedomNeocon
It think just about any national security bureaucrat hates releasing docs (unless it's libs leaking to the MSM), but still Negroponte should have grasped how important it is for these docs to be read and translated.

It's not just an institutional reluctance to release documents... it's that the documents that have not been translated will almost certainly have information in them on people we are going to want to capture, on front companies and suppliers that we are going to want to investigate, and other countries involvement which me may want to learn more about - and it's generally easier to investigate entities if they don't know how much the investigators have on them.

115 posted on 06/13/2006 3:34:07 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: avacado
"forgeries"

I was not wondering if they were forgeries. I know they're real. I was just putting myself in the place of the discomfited libs who were hoping that they were forgeries. But they most likely have realized that the docs are the real thing too. Therefore they must quash these revelations because they prove Bush right about Iraq.

The utter lack of interest in these docs by the media is truly amazing. If they had proved Bush wrong about Iraq, they of course would have been frontpage material for months. But they proved him right which is profoundly embarrassing to the left. Therefore total silence.

116 posted on 06/14/2006 2:12:28 AM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: driftless

As you can see in memo-gate, they are experts at determining forgeries. I'm sure the democrats, the left and the MSM will to say these documents are forgeries and will go out of the way to prove this. Remember that one story the MSM ran about the Iraq docs and how they were spun? That Saddam was "frustrated" because he was complying with inspectors so hard when dozens of documents already proved otherwise.


117 posted on 06/27/2006 8:27:53 AM PDT by AmericanYankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: AmericanYankee
"Saddam"

What is so amazing about the left is their willingness to believe Hussein knowing his past...even before the 2003. It's like believing Hitler in 1938. Nevetheless enough hard evidence has come out about Hussein's ties to A-Q and his wmds that will be difficult for the left to spin. But they will try their best.

118 posted on 06/28/2006 1:59:02 AM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson