Posted on 06/04/2006 5:34:02 AM PDT by Fzob
The conservative politics of the Bush administration forced me to have an abortion I didn't want. Well, not literally, but let me explain.
I am a 42-year-old happily married mother of two elementary-schoolers. My husband and I both work, and like many couples, we're starved for time together. One Thursday evening this past March, we managed to snag some rare couple time and, in a sudden rush of passion, I failed to insert my diaphragm.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
I made a mistake on the original reply. See my explanation here.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1643130/posts?page=83#83
When there's no plan B you won't be committing murder. Typical liberal forgetfulness........I was just swept away by passion.....................huh? You're a 42 year old hag! Get a life.
I think this liberal woman thinks the "religious right" has infringed on her rights and blames everyone except herself.
Of course, when in a liberal's mind are they responsible for ANYTHING?
As always, you are RIGHT! This is a totally concocted story. Sheer nonsense propaganda for RU!
Don't blame Bush for your own personal guilt.
Everything in the story is waaaaayyyyy to conventient. Every possible scenerio from her being over 40 and on chloresterol drugs, so by no fault of her own she is high risk. To her momentary laspe from being normally responsible just happen to have occured on Thursday, so when her doctor said no on Friday the 72-hour window would be over before Monday. Every possible swipe including the snipe about 'security reasons' at the abortion clinic, aluding to those evil abortion protestors. This story is one more of the mounting numbers of examples of the new journalistic standard of 'False but accurate' made famous by Dan Rather.
So why is that the fault of conservatives and how do the Democrats escape being blamed here too?
You're thinking of RU-486. This is "Plan B", a "morning after pill" that works on a very different principle. There have been rumors that Plan B "might" prevent implantation, but there's no evidence whatsoever that it does, and quite a few studies which show that it doesn't.
That's why some pharmacists and physicians want nothing to do with it.
If "some pharmacists and physicians" are acting on myths instead of reality, they're not fit to practice.
Yeah Dana, it's religion's fault! You're absolutely crazy.
Her point is a valid one, even if you wish to sidestep it, and even if there are other parts of her essay which are poorly argued. The "Plan B" contraceptive should be available, and is being blocked unnecessarily due to misunderstandings and knee-jerk objections, many of them based on religious premises.
She was trying to, but many people are blocking a means by which she could. Thus her point.
If you really didn't want to have more children .. there is also the snip snip option that you or your hubby could have had done
There are many valid reasons that couples decide not to take this step, and it's unconscionable to demand that they do so just because a means of contraception is being withheld for no good reason.
Those "moral/religious issues" are inexcusable, because they're based on a) gross misunderstandings about how this particular contraception actually works, or b) a "morality" that tries to force their own beliefs about contraception onto other people.
"To this day, I don't know why my doctors wouldn't prescribe Plan B -- whether it was because of moral opposition to contraception or out of fear of political protesters or just because they preferred not to go there.
In any event, they were also partly responsible for why I was stuck that Friday, and why I was ultimately forced to confront the decision to terminate my third pregnancy."
Here is someone else to blame for her situation.I would wonder if she has ever accepted responsibility for anything in her life, especially if it had a less than perfect outcome.
I did a little research on what she was saying. She mentioned the following things that I found interesting:
I did a little searching for weather history on the day of the Cherry Blossom parade and assumed that the writer was referring to the 2006 parade, which occurred on 10:00AM, Saturday the 8th of April. According to weather data, it was raining in the morning, but accumulations were about 0.01 inches up to about 9:43, when the weather type switched from "light rain" to "rain". Temperature was hovering around 57 degrees at that time. It started picking up a bit as 10:00am approached, but I think bleak downpour is a deliberate embellishment on the part of the writer.
The parade was due to start at 10:00AM that day, with the parade route traveling down Constitution Avenue between 7th and 17th streets. I'm not sure where the Planned Parenthood clinic is actually located, but this raises a bit of suspicion to me.
The intensely personal nature of the writing, the anonymity of the writer, embellished details, and the blatant appeal to pity definitely places this piece in the suspicious column for me.
Heh, perhaps we need a color coded suspicion level chart for articles posted from the lame stream media.
--
For those interested, I got my weather data and parade information from these two links:
Unfortunately, in the case of this contraceptive, the "religious right and the Bush Administration" does bear a lot of blame.
Also unfortunately, it's behavior like this which is giving conservatism a bad name, and reinforcing the negative stereotype of conservatives as overly moralistic busybodies who want to control other people's lives and force other people to obey their personal views on sex and reproduction. This kind of stuff doesn't help bring more people to the conservative movement, and it drives a lot of people away.
So to absolve herself of any blame in the death of her child, she blames the PRESIDENT? Too bad her two kids won't have the pleasure of having a baby brother or sister, because their Mom was too self-centered to be bothered at her advanced age of 40.
This isn't about RU-486. Why don't you try reading the article before you go off on a rant?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.