Skip to comments.
The Portable Dan Brown (Da Vinci Code Alert)
townhall.com ^
| 6/1/06
| Mike Adams
Posted on 06/03/2006 4:18:41 PM PDT by beyond the sea
I used to think The Koran was the best book to read in the airport, simply because carrying it guarantees youll never get searched by airport security. Later, I decided that The Book of Mormon was better because it guarantees the person sitting next to you will never start a conversation during the flight. Now, Ive decided once and for all, I think that The Da Vinci Code has both of them topped.
Toting Dan Browns book is far better than toting the aforementioned works of fiction because it helps to identify my least favorite segment of American society the conspiracy theorists. The following excerpts from real conversations conversations people actually initiated with me after seeing my copy of The Da Vinci Code - explain why I now carry it to work, to restaurants, and just about everywhere except for church:
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: code; davinci; jesus; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: beyond the sea
This was such a funny column. I love Mike Adams ... but he's married. Well, I am too, but why quibble?
2
posted on
06/03/2006 4:23:13 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(I am a daughter of God, a child of the King, a holy fire burning with His love.)
To: beyond the sea
3
posted on
06/03/2006 4:24:22 PM PDT
by
Mercat
(He's everywhere you are.)
To: beyond the sea
Great article! If I was still on the road a lot, I would have to start carrying DVC for amusements sake.
4
posted on
06/03/2006 4:32:07 PM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: beyond the sea
lol! Like this?
5
posted on
06/03/2006 4:34:14 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: beyond the sea
"But when people talk about what they have discovered or research that they have done, I find that they generally dont know what the hell they are talking about."
hahahaha
6
posted on
06/03/2006 4:36:44 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(In order to avoid being called a flirt, she always yielded easily.)
To: beyond the sea
Great column. Worth the read. The conspiracy crowd cracks me up too. Loved that Barnes and Noble "fiction" department remark.
7
posted on
06/03/2006 4:37:33 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(DemocRATS! America's Lynch Mob.)
To: Tax-chick
The Koran
. The Book of Mormon
aforementioned works of fiction..
Hes very funny but that picture makes him a bit too pasty looking for my taste.
Conspiracy theorists are among my least favorite segments of American society too, but its fun to blow their theories to bits with reason and common sense.
But Im sure to start some trouble here by saying I believe parts of the Bible are probably fictional too and some stories are allegories, meant to teach a lesson on some greater truth. The Jonah and the Whale story and the whole God created the world in 6 days then rested on the 7th thing comes to mind. I never understood this one, not that He couldnt do it in 6 days if you believe He is almighty, but why did he need to rest then? Are unions that powerful in Heaven too?
8
posted on
06/03/2006 4:45:16 PM PDT
by
Caramelgal
(I don't have a tag line.... I am a tag line. So tag, you are it.)
To: sageb1
9
posted on
06/03/2006 4:51:31 PM PDT
by
Sender
("Why, by God, I actually pity those poor sons-of-b*tches we're going up against. By God, I do".)
To: beyond the sea
Great column. I'm always amused by conspiracy theorists. My own personal conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists are folks who lead such dull and uninteresting lives that they find it necessary to create a world of fiction in which they are among the few "elite" who really know the "truth". The irony is, of course, that their truth is fiction. And the reality is, of course, that our world is so complex and interesting that nobody has a need to create a fictional world no matter how boring they think their own lives are.
10
posted on
06/03/2006 4:53:52 PM PDT
by
Rokke
To: Caramelgal
but why did he need to rest then? Are unions that powerful in Heaven too? Chortle!
Real answer: the LORD didn't need to rest, but He did, as an example to us.
11
posted on
06/03/2006 5:02:59 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(I am a daughter of God, a child of the King, a holy fire burning with His love.)
To: beyond the sea
Platonic dialectic (see: http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Anci/AnciFort.htm)
Re: Mike Adams' dialectic
Conversation 2
Q: Oh, I just love that book. Have you read about the Council of Nicea and how they conspired to keep out the Gnostic Gospels? It was all so political the way they choose the Books of the Bible, dont you agree?
A: No.
Q: Well, why not?
A: Ive read the Bible seven times, the New Testament ten times, and all of the so-called Gnostic Gospels.
Q: And what have you concluded?
A: The New Testament books were selected long before 325 A.D. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were either written by eyewitnesses or on the basis of eyewitness evidence. The Gnostic Gospels were not. In addition to being incoherent fragments, they were written many, many decades later....
Jude 14-15 "Now Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about these men also, saying, 'Behold, the Lord comes with 10,000 of his saints, to execute judgment on all, to convict all who are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have committed in an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him.'"
Adams' logical problem: The following prophecy quoted in Jude is not found in the Bible. It is neither in the Old or New Testament. It is cited from The Book of Enoch--a gnostic scroll. Ergo, the original scroll has been redacted out of the New Testament.
Perhaps Mike Adams should consider a basic class in logic when writing. Adams employs logical fallacies of Petitio Principii and Argumentum ad Verecundiam: I read the Bible 7 times therefore what I opine concerning the gnostic gospels must be true. Mike, just because one reads the Bible a thousand times a thousand one can still be dead wrong on catholic redaction. The Catholics redacted the New Testament and the Jewish scribes redacted the Old Testament. These are undisputed facts by all biblical experts.
12
posted on
06/03/2006 5:09:28 PM PDT
by
sully777
(wWBBD: What would Brian Boitano do?)
To: beyond the sea
To: beyond the sea
To: Rokke
You are one of those who conspires against the people who know The Real Story. In fact, there is a special organization of people like you. It is very secretive. The only way you can find out about it is to do a Google search. And then it changes its name every so often to confuse the innocent. But you know that already, don't you.
15
posted on
06/03/2006 6:31:02 PM PDT
by
sine_nomine
(No more RINO presidents. We need another Reagan.)
To: redgolum
16
posted on
06/03/2006 6:32:36 PM PDT
by
qwertyz
To: sine_nomine
"The only way you can find out about it is to do a Google search."
Shhhh. Don't mention "Google". And whatever you do, DO NOT reveal what G-O-O-G-L-E really stands for. It is up to those of "us" who know all of this already, to keep the rest of the sheeple safe.
17
posted on
06/03/2006 7:41:26 PM PDT
by
Rokke
To: sully777
"The Catholics redacted the New Testament and the Jewish scribes redacted the Old Testament. These are undisputed facts by all biblical experts." Not true - the tenants of the faith had been established and submitted to the church long before the Catholic influence began corrupting the teachings of the Messiah.
The Jewish scribes translated the OT into the Septuagint long before Jesus' time. All of the very first converts to the new covenant were Jewish even three thousand in one day on the day of Shavuot (Pentecost) in Acts 2.
Dan Brown's book is bunk and I wouldn't want to be in his shoes when he faces the Master on the day of reckoning.
18
posted on
06/03/2006 8:32:08 PM PDT
by
patriot_wes
(Law of Unintended Consequences; Infant Baptism = an unbelieving, unsaved church.)
To: patriot_wes
19
posted on
06/03/2006 8:38:31 PM PDT
by
Pyro7480
(What do leftists, Islamists, & Jack Chick and his ilk have in common? Hatred of the Catholic Church)
To: patriot_wes
Oh my, now you've done it. The poster wanted ALL biblical scholars in agreement (with him) and you had to take that bauble away from the poster.
20
posted on
06/03/2006 8:39:59 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson