Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

War is a cruel and inefficient remedy (LAUGH AND BARF LIBERALLY)
Chicago Tribune Voice of the People ^ | May 29, 2006 | Richard Eastman

Posted on 05/29/2006 8:10:00 AM PDT by Chi-townChief

On the last Monday in May, when we celebrate our war dead, we are to remember that yesterday’s pain ensures today’s liberties.

The inference is that war has been the ultimate (and necessary) price of freedom.

But how free are the dead? And could we have honestly avoided the wars in our history?

Suppose the Colonies had not revolted against England in the War of Independence. Would we have become the major British colony, gaining enough influence to modify the authoritarianism of the British crown and to gain the rights which we now cherish?

Like Canada we might eventually and peacefully split off as an independent nation.

Or suppose the North had not retaliated for the South’s firing on Ft. Sumter. Would our nation have split in two? Or would the anti-slavery movement, already strong, have eventually converted the South so that we became one free nation?

Suppose America had stayed out of the war against Adolf Hitler. Presumably we entered World War II in fear that Hitler, after conquering Europe, would then come after us. It’s hard to contest that point except to say that if Germany had been treated more humanely after World War I, Hitler might never have risen.

The point is not that war was inevitable or glorious, but that it was a cruel and inefficient remedy invoked only after peaceable remedies had failed or been neglected.

Our great need is to discover problems and workable alternatives in time to make them succeed.

Hitlers cannot rise in nations of contented countrymen.

Should we rename Memorial Day "The Day for Peace"?

(Excerpt) Read more at newsblogs.chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: atadsimplistic; liberaldreck; libtard; naive
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Somehow, this clown seems to have missed Pearl Harbor and 9/11 although he did pick up Fort Sumter.
1 posted on 05/29/2006 8:10:01 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

That may be true,but it's all that stands between those who wish not to be oppressed and those who wish to oppress.


2 posted on 05/29/2006 8:12:49 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

"....when we celebrate our war dead,...."

the asswipe lost ME in the first sentence!


3 posted on 05/29/2006 8:13:20 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

a cruel and inefficient remedy invoked only after peaceable remedies had failed

Well, there you have it.


4 posted on 05/29/2006 8:13:57 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Ahhh, "The Great 'What If?' Game". It always ends up with a rosy outcome, doesn't it? Imagine that.


5 posted on 05/29/2006 8:17:37 AM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

He makes Alan Alda look macho.

What a total moron!


6 posted on 05/29/2006 8:19:15 AM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

War may be cruel and inefficient, but it's far less so than appeasement.


7 posted on 05/29/2006 8:20:26 AM PDT by Maceman (Fake but accurate, and now double-sourced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
But how free are the dead? And could we have honestly avoided the wars in our history? Suppose the Colonies had not revolted against England in the War of Independence...

I wonder if this sackful of mush shaves yet. He doesn't even quite have a command of English, yet.

"Revolted"? WTH?

An apprentice clueless reporter? He seems definitely to qualify!

8 posted on 05/29/2006 8:21:09 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Suppose the Colonies had not revolted against England in the War of Independence.... Or suppose the North had not retaliated for the South’s firing on Ft. Sumter... Suppose America had stayed out of the war against Adolf Hitler.

Suppose Eastman wasn't 10 minutes from his deadline and out of ideas for a column...?

9 posted on 05/29/2006 8:24:26 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. 17,400+ snide replies and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

I guess it's better then 'revoluted'.


10 posted on 05/29/2006 8:25:38 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
"Professor emeritus and former academic dean of North Central College. Professor Eastman composes recorder music and writes short pieces of all kinds. He has published occasional columns in metropolitan newspapers. His book, Tangled Tassels: Tales of Academe, appeared in 1996."

Girly-man alert.

11 posted on 05/29/2006 8:26:16 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

How easy is it to write an article filled with the word "suppose". Liberals dealing in their fantasy world while the rest of us deal in reality.


12 posted on 05/29/2006 8:26:58 AM PDT by oneofmany (Slaying the Fifth Column with the Truth as my sword.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

More importantly, if the US had not entered WWI, the Entente and the Central Powers would have come to some compromise to end the fighting. It is all but impossible to imagine Adolf Hitler rising to power, if WWI ended by a negotiated peace instead of the "Armistice."


13 posted on 05/29/2006 8:29:52 AM PDT by quadrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
"Revolted"? WTH?

How would you have termed it? It isn't called "The Revolution" for nothing.

14 posted on 05/29/2006 8:30:02 AM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Suppose American journalists had to report in German, and only after the Party edited their words?


15 posted on 05/29/2006 8:30:20 AM PDT by Sender (Error 404: Tagline Server Not Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
celebrate our war dead

Celebrate?

16 posted on 05/29/2006 8:32:41 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Should we rename Memorial Day "The Day for Peace"?

In a word, no.

That might be an educational exercise for children up to say, the fourth grade, but a truly profoundly ignorant question for informed, educated adults.

17 posted on 05/29/2006 8:33:22 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

The large elephant in the corner that Eastman, and all peaceniks like him, ignores is that evil exists. There will always be evil people, (like Hitler, Genghis Khan, etc.) who will wage war on their fellow man for nefarious reasons. Again peaceniks like Eastman believe that pure evil can be reasoned with. It can't. As if millions of Americans standing on the east coast playing guitars and singing Kum Buyah would have stopped Hitler's troops as they crossed the ocean. He lives in a dreamworld.


18 posted on 05/29/2006 8:33:33 AM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quadrant
More importantly, if the US had not entered WWI, the Entente and the Central Powers would have come to some compromise to end the fighting. It is all but impossible to imagine Adolf Hitler rising to power, if WWI ended by a negotiated peace instead of the "Armistice."

Interesting theory. What makes you think that the meat grinder of WW I wouldn't have continued until there was a victor? Were there negotiations prior to the US entry in to the war?

APf

19 posted on 05/29/2006 8:36:14 AM PDT by APFel (Individualism. The alpha and the omega.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Hooboy! what planet is this guy on?

"suppose the world was full of gumdrop trees and rainbows and lollypop lanes"

yeesh


20 posted on 05/29/2006 8:37:04 AM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson