Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eastwood attacks Japan war myths
The Observer (U.K.) ^ | 05/28/06 | Justin McCurry

Posted on 05/27/2006 7:18:26 PM PDT by Pokey78

Two new movies based on a bloody 1945 battle are stirring up memories and forcing both sides to re-examine their history


More than 60 years after it became one of the bloodiest battlefields of the Second World War, Iwo Jima's tragic history retains the power to overwhelm. As his plane prepared to land on the isolated Japanese island last month, the actor Ken Watanabe found he could not hold back the tears. Accompanying Watanabe, who shot to stardom playing a feudal warlord opposite Tom Cruise in The Last Samurai, was another hard man of Hollywood whose time on Iwo Jima would lead to something of a professional epiphany.

When Clint Eastwood's two films about Iwo Jima, one of the darkest periods of the Pacific War, reach cinemas this year, audiences could be excused for forgetting the man behind them was once the trigger-happy Dirty Harry.

The 75-year-old director has promised Flags Of Our Fathers and Red Sun, Black Sand will attempt to show for the first time the suffering of both sides during 36 days of fighting in early 1945 that turned the island into a flattened wasteland.

(Excerpt) Read more at observer.guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fivemarinesonesailor; flagraising; flagsofourfathers; iwojima; marinecorps; marines; mtsuribachi; redsunblacksand; threeflagraisers; usmc; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-336 next last
To: LibWhacker
All Eastwood's movie is going to accomplish is to somehow rekindle Japan's pride in its military past and lend support to its already strong sense of victimization

from what the Japanese actor said, this may be jujst the opposite???

Per:

"Watanabe. [the Japanese actor]'As we went through this film, we realised that until now we haven't really looked at Japan's past. We kind of looked away from it,' he said. 'But we have to look at it and accept the fact that this is what our fathers and grandfathers have done. Accepting the reality is the first step.'

161 posted on 05/28/2006 4:11:20 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Starting with Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, is it possible that old Clint is fronting for some younger ghost producer/director?


162 posted on 05/28/2006 6:12:58 AM PDT by TET1968 (SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; Coop; tet68; FARS; MudPuppy; Little Bill
I see no problem with showing the human side of an enemy. Iwo Jima has stories of Marines who found pictures of Japanese families in the helmets of the men they just mowed down, and how the Marines choked up at seeing their human counterpart's families.

The individual humaness of a battle and our enemy does not offend me.

BUT, I do wish your second point was addressed more completely, such as the reason we went to war in the first place, without including Pearl Harbor. Those actions were surely lacking heroism, such as the Bataan death march and the Rape of Nanking.

Movies about those issues can never be sanitized and still be called accurate, but showing the struggles and worries and heroism of the Japs when facing an invasion, I dont see a problem with that, as long as we still know they are the bad guys.

You have to admit, they KNEW they were going to die. They showed some fanatical boldness, a ferocity that has not been matched until Fallujah.

As combat soldiers, they were surely respected.
163 posted on 05/28/2006 6:20:45 AM PDT by RaceBannon (ma(Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Read "Flyboys" which, despite the author's attempts to inject moral relativism, makes it abundantly clear that the Japanese were utter barbarians, who needed to be totally crushed.


164 posted on 05/28/2006 6:28:04 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
They might mean "controversial" because the photographer first took a shot of the men standing at attention next to a small flag, which the Navy radioed to say it couldn't see from the ships. So they found a much bigger flag and "re-raised" it. The famous photo, and the subsequent statue, depict the second flag-raising.

But somehow I doubt that is what the author of this article meant.

165 posted on 05/28/2006 6:29:57 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Yes, I have so much more respect for the Japanese soldiers - who right or wrong were defending their country just like you or me - as opposed to these current cowardly sleazeballs who live to slaughter children in day care centers or families at wedding parties and restaurants.


166 posted on 05/28/2006 6:32:18 AM PDT by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

It would have been nice for Clint to have remembered the conduct of the Japs in the rape of Nanking, the rape of Shanghai, the Bataan Death March, their "medical experiments" on helpless POWs, the building of the railroad that was involved in "The Bridge on the River Kai," and countless other atrocities. The sewed the wind and they justly reaped the whirlwind. Payback's a bitch.


167 posted on 05/28/2006 6:34:50 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LS

I have recently watched THE FLAG RAISERS ON IWO JIMA a few times in the last week, people here seem to forget something

Joe Rosenthal was asked if he posed his shot, he thought they meant the "school photo" as he called it, the one after where they all raised their helmets and posed, and he corrected that comment, but the question was not forgotten

Also, Marine Sgt Lowrey took the very first flag raising photos and they were never released in the war due to Rosenthal's picture making first to the media. (Lowrey was a LEATHERNECK reporter and photographer, not AP)

Another controversy is the identification of just who was who in the picture. The man on the far right was misidentified and it was after the war that Ira Hayes visited Harlon Block's family and told them the story. Harlon's Mom always insisted that was her son, and the formal USMC investigation proved her correct.

Some Admiral wanted the first flag but the Marine commander refused to hand it over.


168 posted on 05/28/2006 6:35:44 AM PDT by RaceBannon (ma(Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: LS

That's not true, either, the ships did see it, it was just decided to add a larger one to be seen easier.

The ships blasted their horns at the raising of the first one.

The second raising was almost a non event, no one really cared then, the excitement was over.


169 posted on 05/28/2006 6:37:27 AM PDT by RaceBannon (ma(Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"Crank up the Enola Gay..."

-Lewis Grizzard

170 posted on 05/28/2006 6:40:02 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

You want to bomb this? Those are fighting words my friend!!!!!!!!

171 posted on 05/28/2006 6:48:20 AM PDT by Tolkien (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Tolkien

You're obviously not familiar with Lewis Grizzard or the context of my quote...No I'm not for bombing 'that', but nor am I much in the mood for showing suicidal fanatic adherents of an imperial death cult in a positive light when pitted against 19-year-old American Marines.


172 posted on 05/28/2006 6:54:53 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: stevem
I believe you are the only one to mention Okinawa. How about a movie on the occupation of Okinawa and the treatment of its citizens by the Japs from Hollywood?
173 posted on 05/28/2006 6:55:05 AM PDT by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero » with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

On that, I agree with you. I have read some of Lewis Grizzard but that was many years ago. I don't remember that quote. From what I remember, he was very anti-second amendment and that was the reason I stopped reading his books, comedy or not. Sorry to have offended you.


174 posted on 05/28/2006 7:02:52 AM PDT by Tolkien (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Tolkien
No offense taken...Grizzard did have one piece (The right to arm bears, IIRC) that was more against the irresponsible use of firearms than firearms per se. I admire him primarily as the canary in coalmine whose warnings about the excesses of political correctness seem prophetic in retrospect. His Enola Gay remarks were directed more toward the 'economic Pearl Harbor,' fears of the 80's and were an admonition to keep in mind that less than 50 years ago (when written) we were in a bloody struggle against the Japanese who wanted nothing less than complete and total domininion of the Pacific, and to many at the time of his column, it seemed we were allowing them to do economically what we had fought so hard to prevent them from doing militarily.
175 posted on 05/28/2006 7:09:51 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

I will see the movies, assuming I choose to do so, when they turn up on TV and I don't mean PPV.

I was just judging by what I read there.


176 posted on 05/28/2006 7:10:15 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Dear US Senators, Representatives and Mr. President: Why are you all trying to destroy our culture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
...as long as we still know they are the bad guys.

That's just it; when the mindset of Hollywood on War is in full gear will they still know much less say so in the film?

177 posted on 05/28/2006 7:58:13 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: C2ShiningC
The wisdom of William Sherman addresses the horrors of war best -- "War is Hell."

He was a general who won two wars -- one of a few years, the other of two hundred and fifty years. In both cases he applied bloodless, yet ruthless, tactics as his major weapon. The March to the Sea in one, the extermination of the great buffalo herds in the other.

Yet in a battle his troops fought with all vehemence and for blood and terror.

War is hell. And to try to avoid a war or keep it from being a hell, both lead to making it more of hell.

* * *

Yet war has rules too. What is the difference to each soul of each victim of the Desden fire-bombing versus the rape of Nanking? There are great differences. Death is death, but it was the indiviual brutality of rapes that most afflicted the souls -- in rape and in extremes of personal or bureaucratic tortures -- the soul is most challenged, becomes most dispirited and loses hope. And it is in releasing themselves to the most base and violent urges that the rapists and torturers rip their own souls to pieces, and the camp guards and bureaucrats suffocate them.

178 posted on 05/28/2006 8:14:26 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

Next we'll see a remake of history with the Bataan march being portayed as a pleasant, two-week walking tour of the rain forests of one of the Phillipines southern resort islands.


179 posted on 05/28/2006 8:16:10 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
As the USMC,USN, USA WW2 Vets in my family said (all long since passed):::

2 Bombs weren't enough...

180 posted on 05/28/2006 8:32:06 AM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-336 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson