Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/25/2006 10:56:43 AM PDT by acad1228
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: acad1228

Wow, that's great! I'm moving to Oklahoma!


2 posted on 05/25/2006 10:58:04 AM PDT by crghill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

Its about time the legislatures started passing this type of law. Too bad SCOTUS will strike it down in due time.


3 posted on 05/25/2006 10:58:52 AM PDT by ibheath (Born again and grateful to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

Oklahoma has it's head attached straight.


5 posted on 05/25/2006 10:59:54 AM PDT by piceapungens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

I want the "and-your-gonna-get-beat-senseless-and-we-hang-you-from-a-light-pole-and-let-the-crows-pick-your-eyes-out" amendment.


7 posted on 05/25/2006 11:01:51 AM PDT by djf (Bedtime story: Once upon a time, they snuck on the boat and threw the tea over. In a land far away..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

This is great. I hope this type of legislation gets passed in all 50 states.

I've said it before. These sex offenders are broken beyond our ability to fix them. They need to be sent back to their Maker for repair.


8 posted on 05/25/2006 11:04:59 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228
A bill to allow the death penalty to be assessed against a person who commits a second sex offense against a child under 14 years old passes the state Senate.

I agree that anyone who repeats such an offense deserves the death penalty. (For that matter, anyone who commits the first offense deserves it.)

However, I would worry that this law might give the sex offender an incentive to kill his victim. If he is subject to the death penalty anyway, it would be tempting to get rid of the witness.

10 posted on 05/25/2006 11:07:48 AM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

The only thing wrong with this is they have to wait for a second child's life to be damaged b/f cleaning up the gene pool.


13 posted on 05/25/2006 11:08:57 AM PDT by VoiceOfBruck (I'm not being defensive. You're the one being defensive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

This should apply to any rapist, but it's moot. The Supreme Court ruled years ago that you cannot execute for rape, punishment exceeds the crime as I recall.


15 posted on 05/25/2006 11:10:34 AM PDT by conservativewasp (Liberals lie for sport and hate our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

A step in the right direction. Hoepfully they also have automatic death penalty for child killers.


16 posted on 05/25/2006 11:11:14 AM PDT by floozy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

Uh..oh! The Gay ...er...NAMBLA lobbyists are going to get their panties in a wad over this.


17 posted on 05/25/2006 11:12:17 AM PDT by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

So someone that touches a 13yo twice, gets the same punishment as someone that rapes a 13yo twice?


19 posted on 05/25/2006 11:14:06 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228; 2witty; A Jovial Cad; AmerRepb; amigatec; Amityschild; Angry_White_Man_Syndrome; ...
Oklahoma Ping!

If you want on
or off this list
Freepmail me.

21 posted on 05/25/2006 11:16:26 AM PDT by 2Jedismom (Life's about changing, nothing ever stays the same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228
As satisfying as this would be,it's a bad,bad idea...for one,and only one,reason:

Any perp covered by this law would have a *very* strong incentive to kill his second victim.

Also,I'll wager that the SCOTUS would strike it down as "unusual",meaning that the punishment is not in proportion to the nature of the crime,as is the case with executing a murderer.

23 posted on 05/25/2006 11:17:39 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

This directly goes against existing Supreme Court precedent, which makes it exceedingly unlikely to withstanding judicial review. A waste of tax payers' money imho.


24 posted on 05/25/2006 11:17:49 AM PDT by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

Sex crimes in Oklahoma plummet.

Sex crimes in other states go up a little.


26 posted on 05/25/2006 11:18:59 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Botulism: Doing the same thing over and over and over, yet expecting a different outcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

Even priests????

What will the Catholic Church say???

How about the Amish?

I wonder if religious figures won't get a break..

and I wonder about an 18yr old guy dating a young girl..them too?

Lets see how this plays out. I doubt they will pass the bill. No matter how much we want them too.

This is a country that allows illegals to do whatever they want, taxes the poor and pardons the rich, and cannot protect its own border.
I doubt the government will help us with this problem either.


27 posted on 05/25/2006 11:20:02 AM PDT by my_jai_05
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

Good start.

Now it should be changed to make it a mandatory sentence for anyone who commits the crime AT ALL.

Then we need to move it into the realm of rape. But with a rider that makes the alleged victim subject to the same penalties if what she testified to is proven to be false.


28 posted on 05/25/2006 11:20:33 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228
"A bill to allow the death penalty to be assessed against a person who commits a second sex offense against a child under 14 years old passes the state Senate."

The death penalty? Well, thank heavens that a child under 14 would never lie about something like that, or is capable of being manipulated to lie.

31 posted on 05/25/2006 11:24:12 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228

If this becomes law, a father can get the death penalty for hugging his little 2 year-old daughter if the local CSD catches him at it.


33 posted on 05/25/2006 11:28:13 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: acad1228
Personally, and I say this as a 100% pro-life person (anti-abortion, andi-death penalty), how will Capital Punishment for sex offenders curb any crime at all?

All it will do, IMHO, is give sex offenders a reason to actually kill those whom they commit the offense against, in order to try and limit their chances of being caught. Cause heck, if they're going to hang anyways, might as well try to not get caught.

The SCOTUS in Coker v. Georgia said as much. A rapist who does not take the life of his victim should not receive a more severe sentence than a deliberate killer. Want to lock the scum away in prison for the rest of his life? Fine by me.

Go ahead and flame away, I've already heard it all.

35 posted on 05/25/2006 11:28:46 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson