Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How ancient whales lost their legs, got sleek and conquered the oceans
EurekAlert (AAAS) ^ | 22 May 2006 | Staff

Posted on 05/23/2006 4:08:38 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

When ancient whales finally parted company with the last remnants of their legs about 35 million years ago, a relatively sudden genetic event may have crowned an eons-long shrinking process.

An international group of scientists led by Hans Thewissen, Ph.D., a professor of anatomy at Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, has used developmental data from contemporary spotted dolphins and fossils of ancient whales to try to pinpoint the genetic changes that could have caused whales, dolphins and porpoises to lose their hind limbs.

More than 50 million years ago the ancestors of whales and dolphins were four-footed land animals, not unlike large dogs. They became the sleek swimmers we recognize today during the next 15 million years, losing their hind limbs in a dramatic example of evolutionary change.

"We can see from fossils that whales clearly lived on land - they actually share a common ancestor with hippos, camels and deer," said team member Martin Cohn, Ph.D., a developmental biologist and associate professor with the UF departments of zoology and anatomy and cell biology and a member of the UF Genetics Institute. "Their transition to an aquatic lifestyle occurred long before they eliminated their hind limbs. During the transition, their limbs became smaller, but they kept the same number and arrangement of hind limb bones as their terrestrial ancestors."

In findings to be published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, scientists say the gradual shrinkage of the whales' hind limbs over 15 million years was the result of slowly accumulated genetic changes that influenced the size of the limbs and that these changes happened sometime late in development, during the fetal period.

However, the actual loss of the hind limb occurred much further along in the evolutionary process, when a drastic change occurred to inactivate a gene essential for limb development. This gene - called Sonic hedgehog - functions during the first quarter of gestation in the embryonic period of the animals' development, before the fetal period.

In all limbed vertebrates, Sonic hedgehog is required for normal limbs to develop beyond the knee and elbow joints. Because ancient whales' hind limbs remained perfectly formed all the way to the toes even as they became smaller suggests that Sonic hedgehog was still functioning to pattern the limb skeleton.

The new research shows that, near the end of 15 million years, with the hind limbs of ancient whales nonfunctional and all but gone, lack of Sonic hedgehog clearly comes into play. While the animals still may have developed embryonic hind limb buds, as happens in today's spotted dolphins, they didn't have the Sonic hedgehog required to grow a complete or even partial limb, although it is active elsewhere in the embryo.

The team also showed why Sonic hedgehog became inactive and all traces of hind limbs vanished at the end of this stage of whale evolution, said Cohn. A gene called Hand2, which normally functions as a switch to turn on Sonic hedgehog, was shown to be inactive in the hind limb buds of dolphins. Without it, limb development grinds to a halt.

"By integrating data from fossils with developmental data from embryonic dolphins, we were able to trace these genetic changes to the point in time when they happened," Thewissen said.

"Studies on swimming in mammals show that a sleek body is necessary for efficient swimming, because projecting organs such as rudimentary hind limbs cause a lot of drag, and slow a swimmer down," said Thewissen, who spends about a month every year in Pakistan and India collecting fossils that document the land-to-water transition of whales.

Researchers say the findings tend to support traditional evolutionary theory, a la Charles Darwin, that says minor changes over vast expanses of time add up to big changes. And while Sonic hedgehog's role in the evolution of hind limbs in ancient whales is becoming apparent, it is still not fully defined.

"It's clear when ancient whales lost all vestiges of the limb it was probably triggered by loss of Sonic hedgehog," said Clifford Tabin, Ph.D., a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School who was not involved in the research. "But it's hard to say for certain because you're looking at events long after they occurred. As they suggest, there could have been a continual decrease in Sonic as the limbs reduced until the modern version of the animal arrived."

The study itself, combining fossil and developmental data, is notable, Tabin said.

"Whales went through this remarkable transformation to become more like the ancestral fish," Tabin said. "Convergence of evolutionary studies and developmental genetics give us another piece in this growing tapestry of how genetic changes lead to morphological change. It is a remarkable process that was achieved simply and led to profound consequences in how whales were able to survive. Only now in the last five years are we developing this understanding of how the world of evolution is controlled genetically."

###

In addition to UF and Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, scientists from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the Indian Institute of Technology were involved in the research. Financial support was provided by the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health and the Indian Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: crevolist; junk; pavlovian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-365 next last
Placemarker
61 posted on 05/23/2006 10:19:28 AM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman; PatrickHenry
It's an excellent example of descent with modification.
Touche! :D
...good point.
62 posted on 05/23/2006 10:21:40 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you....... :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
The first two discovered, desert hedgehog and indian hedgehog, were named for species of hedgehogs, while sonic hedgehog was named for Sega's video game character Sonic the Hedgehog. In addition to orthologues of the three mammalian hh genes, zebrafish have two further homologues: echidna hedgehog, named for the eponymous spiny anteater, and tiggywinkle hedgehog named for a character from Beatrix Potter's books for children.

LOL! Gotta love a scientist with a sense of humor.

63 posted on 05/23/2006 10:38:17 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
Now if they could just explain how half of a whale/dolphin brain falls asleep at a time so the creature doesn't drown we might be on to something.

None of this changes the fact that there has been found a lineage of transitional fossils demonstrating the evolution of whales from land mammals, or the fact that the inactive vestiges of the genes that control the development of limbs have been clearly identified in cetaceans (as explained in this article).

Of course there are many details that evolution has not yet explained. Curious, though, that no matter how important a discovery is made about the evolution of life on earth, that creationists always try to distract attention to points that remain unknown; that's because the information that is known doesn't bode too well for creationism. </understatement>

(Ignore that man behind the curtain!)

64 posted on 05/23/2006 10:46:54 AM PDT by Quark2005 (Confidence follows from consilience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: sittnick

Moby Dyke?


65 posted on 05/23/2006 10:56:25 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Just read the article, absorb the information and have a conversation about it with somebody intelligent intelligently designed enough to believe it.

There. Fixed it. (just kidding).

66 posted on 05/23/2006 11:00:00 AM PDT by peyton randolph (Time for an electoral revolution where the ballot box is the guillotine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Quark2005
Curious, though, that no matter how important a discovery is made about the evolution of life on earth, that creationists always try to distract attention to points that remain unknown; that's because the information that is known doesn't bode too well for creationism.

Literary version: "Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."

Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, Alice in Wonderland

Creationist version:

"Why, sometimes I've declared as many as six things impossible before breakfast."


67 posted on 05/23/2006 11:20:04 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death--Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
Now if they could just explain how half of a whale/dolphin brain falls asleep at a time so the creature doesn't drown we might be on to something. Hint: it really is a big deal, because each hemisphere must have the necessary tracts and nucleii for full function. That's something that isn't present in human brains, btw.

From what I can tell (admittedly only from quick googling) it is NOT apparent at this time what, if any, neural structures may be present in cetaceans that allow this. This is a hot topic, but the research still seems to be in an early stage.

It also seems far from clear that cetaceans have "full function" during these periods of "drowsing," when they close one eye and the opposite side of the brain reduces its activity levels. In fact they often sink a bit in the water and seem to loose some function. It may provide just enough wakefulness to alert them to predators and remind them to breath. (NOTE: Breathing is a conscious activity for cetaceans. In humans, and other land animals, it is an automatic function that does not require consciousness.)

In any case it's not yet clear that there are any drastic physiological/neural differences behind this capability. It may just be (in the typical fashion of evolutionary tinkering) a slight modification, or modified usage, of structures already present.

68 posted on 05/23/2006 11:20:40 AM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
A bunch of wristwatch parts tumbled in a clothes dryer for 35,000,000 years won't put themselves together into a wristwatch; not even if you run it for 100,000,000 years.

I don't believe it.


While I will not dispute your claim, I do not see how it is in any way related to the current topic of discussion. Did you perhaps post this to the wrong discussion?
69 posted on 05/23/2006 11:27:23 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
There's a great deal about science that members of the Darwin fan club won't - or perhaps can't - understand.

And that seems to give you satisfaction. Yes, there is much about biology we don't understand, but we're understanding more every day. Whereas that ol' book is just the same as it was 1700 years ago.

70 posted on 05/23/2006 11:31:03 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor (...founder of African Amputees for Pat Robertson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: KeepUSfree
To deny obvious truths spread about you by the creator is blasphemous!

These "obvious truths" are not being spread by the creator, but by scientists. There is a big difference (although probably not to you).
71 posted on 05/23/2006 11:41:37 AM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Grooooooooooooooooooooooan!


72 posted on 05/23/2006 11:43:49 AM PDT by balrog666 (There is no freedom like knowledge, no slavery like ignorance. - Ali ibn Ali-Talib)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
How ancient whales lost their legs ---

Answer: Well, about 35 million years ago 3 or 4 whales were running in the Preakness and the lead whale broke its hind leg in three place......After that the Animal Racing Assoc. restricted whales from racing again. Soon after that, the whales lost all their legs....
73 posted on 05/23/2006 11:49:05 AM PDT by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
[ How ancient whales lost their legs, got sleek and conquered the oceans ]

(Eddie Murphy laugh)...

74 posted on 05/23/2006 11:50:49 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
[ How ancient whales lost their legs, got sleek and conquered the oceans ]

The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction has to make sense - Tom Clancy

75 posted on 05/23/2006 11:54:31 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
I would rather walk with the Lord than to follow their atheistic belief system.

False Dichotomy. Strawman. Appeal to Authority. Non Sequitur.

Congrads for packing so many logical fallacies in such a brief statement.

76 posted on 05/23/2006 11:55:56 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death </Stewie>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
How ancient whales lost their legs, got sleek and conquered the oceans

Well, here is the "got sleek" part:

Pretty impressive.

77 posted on 05/23/2006 11:58:44 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death </Stewie>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003; GarySpFc
If he had added an insulting snide comment regarding those who accept evolution, he could also have fit an ad hominem in there, though some might argue that an ad hominem is already implied with his incorrect implication that all who accept evolution are atheists.
78 posted on 05/23/2006 12:20:16 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio


And don't forget "poisoning the well."


79 posted on 05/23/2006 12:26:00 PM PDT by Almagest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
(Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.)

So true!

80 posted on 05/23/2006 12:34:33 PM PDT by jennyp (Twiggy Twiggy, Twiggy Twiggy, Twiggy Twiggy, Twiggy Twiggy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-365 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson