Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was the American Bombing Campaign in World War II a War Crime?
American Heritage Magazine ^ | April 6, 2006 | Fredric Smoler

Posted on 05/20/2006 8:33:39 PM PDT by tbird5

Deliberately targeting civilians is widely considered terrorism nowadays, but during World War II both the Britain’s Bomber Command and the United States Army Air Force deliberately targeted civilians.

The British philosopher A. C. Grayling, in his new book Among the Dead Cities: The History and Moral Legacy of the WWII Bombing of Civilians in Germany and Japan (Walker, $25.95), points out that the two air forces combined killed perhaps 600,000 German civilians and another 200,000 Japanese. He makes the case that at least by our current standards we were terrorists, and it logically follows that the attacks were war crimes. In an age of political terror, when it is urgent to come up with a persuasive distinction between legitimate and illegitimate violence, it is hard to overstate the importance of the questions Grayling raises.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanheritage.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: academia; bataandeathmarch; bombingserbcivilians; japaneseatrocities; japanesemanchura; londonblitz; nowewon; raf; rapeofnanking; terrorbombing; tonsonserbia; usaaf; v1buzzbomb; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 321 next last
To: Lockbar

As always, payback is given to those who didn´t order the attack on Poland or China. And don´t come me with "they voted for war". Nobody imagined in 1933 that Hitler would start a war against its neighbours.

So, bombs on civilians was surely wrong. Was it a war crime? From our viewpoint today, probably - from the ex ante view, probably not. Should those who bombed feel shame? Maybe. Should they regret that innocents died? Definitely. Should they be punished, or do they deserve contempt? He** no! They´re not to blame. They simply didn´t know better. Times were different, we´ve have developed new measures of war, and that´s good.

Michael from Hamburg,
Germany


241 posted on 05/21/2006 4:11:04 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I have never seen any objective analysis of World War II in which it was determined that "an all out invasion of the Japanese mainland would have been necessary."

Whether or not there is any modern anlaysis on its necessity, the invasions were going to happen.

Operation Olympic was slated for November of 1945. Operation Coronet was a go for the following spring. These two were the largest parts of the overall Operation Downfall.

Our WWII losses, though not the worst of all participants, were bad enough. But we may have lost an entire generation of men had Truman not made his choice.

This kind of hindsight analyis is, IMHO, mental masturbation designed to sow contoversy and, in the end, sell books.

242 posted on 05/21/2006 4:17:17 AM PDT by AngryJawa ({NRA}{IDPA})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound

Do you think that everybody has the duty to risk his life under oppression to prevent your dictator from doing something wrong? I don´t think that. I believe that those who try can be considered heros (and if they fail: martyrs). So, if we call them heros, then their behaviour must be extraordinary. If it´s extraordinary, we cannot say it´s something everybody has to do. I don´t blame Germans for not standing up against Hitler. I blame those who pulled the trigger when pointing their guns on unarmed, who filled the chambers with cyclon B, but not the average woman fearing for her husband´s life while she tried to escape the bombs or the following firestorm.

Do you think that every Iranian who doesn´t stand up against Ahmadi-F-him is guilty? Guilt is individual. And yes, if Iran gets the adequate response, I will feel sorry for those who didn´t want that conflict.


243 posted on 05/21/2006 4:18:58 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

"In war, you got to beat the enemy, otherwise, you'll lose."

Yup. Today our enemies (and many of them are American politicians) consider an American attack of military nature to be an atrocity, but a senseless, insane Muslim slaughter of innocent civilians isn't even on their radar.


244 posted on 05/21/2006 4:27:46 AM PDT by RoadTest (For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil. 1 Jno.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tbird5
This is the type of historic revisionism that will destroy us. We have the absolute right to defend ourselves. End of story.

Every day the legions of degenrates dedicated to the death of western civilization grows. And they are birthed in the belly of academia. A region that sucks at the public teat and spits on those people that make their cozy little womb possible.

When will academia demonstrate a sense of responsibility to the culture that supports them.

Parasites the lot of them.

245 posted on 05/21/2006 4:29:30 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

Thanks for the story about your dad. Everyone needs to hear stories like this to counteract the despicable revisionist propaganda that smug, holier than thou college professors, and people like Alberta's Child, try to spread about our actions. These are disgusting people who try to discredit and criminalize the heroic actions of the Allies in WWII, while enjoying the very freedoms, rights, and saftety that those actions have provided them. It's unbelieveable to think that there are so many sympathizers like this around when the facts and circumstances surrounding that war are so widely known throughout the world. These people are no different than the Ward Churchill types around today who try to justify al Qaeda's attacks on 9/11. The funny thing is that if their sick and ignorant views of history were actually true then they would be the first ones targeted for elimination by the very despots they are so eager to defend.


246 posted on 05/21/2006 4:37:23 AM PDT by frankiep (Visualize Whirled Peas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: tbird5

There is only one law of war
YOU WIN IT


247 posted on 05/21/2006 4:40:27 AM PDT by 1903A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaggs
You appear to be unaware the Japanese had a major atom bomb project of their own. Associated with it were giant aircraft carrier submarines, long range bombers, and a number of other elements all designed to enable their military to drop atom bombs on American cities.

We not only beat them at their own game by developing the atom bomb first, we demonstrated why they'd best not try it now or in the future as a retaliatory strike.

248 posted on 05/21/2006 4:42:58 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth
Some of these guys confound "unconditional surrender" with "declaration of war".

Big difference ~

249 posted on 05/21/2006 4:45:26 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
But during WWII that is the way both sides fought.

Now,in the WOT, it is the way only ONE side fights. America observes Marquis de Queensbury rules of etiquitte while pursuing this war.

250 posted on 05/21/2006 4:45:36 AM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tbird5

Since we won, no. If we would have lost, it would have been a war crime, sure.


251 posted on 05/21/2006 4:47:08 AM PDT by Flightdeck (Longhorns+January=Rose Bowl Repeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbird5

In the eyes of revisionist pacifist the whole war was a crime.

Pacifism is a cancer that eats away the national guts.


252 posted on 05/21/2006 4:47:33 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Was Sherman's "March to the Sea" a war crime?

Depends on who you ask. I was down south visiting a few friends last summer and I mentioned Sherman. I was told "Hey, you watch your language over there!"

253 posted on 05/21/2006 4:49:37 AM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

Should we ever see a war like WWII agin, we will be bombing civilian targets. When it comes to survival, "nice" will not be a concern.

Exactly right on point. The problem with these revisionists is that they are viewing history while willingly disregarding the fact that they are completely secure. To them, it seems as if our victory in the war was a foregone conclusion from the outset. They either don't, or refuse, to see that this most certainly was not the case, and that there was a very real possibility of the facist Axis powers winning.

You nailed it when you say that being nice is not a concern when survival is at stake. WWII was a conflict that would determine if the forces of freedom, or the forces of tyranny and oppression, would control the world. And the outcome was never certain. Perhaps if the revisionists were capable of understanding this they would not be complaining about the way it all turned out.

254 posted on 05/21/2006 4:50:11 AM PDT by frankiep (Visualize Whirled Peas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: tbird5

Don't we owe reparations to someone?..../s


255 posted on 05/21/2006 4:52:01 AM PDT by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankiep

"Oh geez.

Bad things happen in war.......because it's war. People die."

Sure, but you can't excuse everything done during war with that quick statement. We wouldn't excuse what Hitler did (or the Japanese in China). FYI, I believe dropping the nukes was the right thing to do.


256 posted on 05/21/2006 4:54:41 AM PDT by Flightdeck (Longhorns+January=Rose Bowl Repeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tbird5

Times, as well as standard of conduct change.


257 posted on 05/21/2006 4:56:42 AM PDT by roaddog727 (eludium PU36 explosive space modulator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbird5
Me? I don't mind killing our enemies, our enemies parents, our enemies children or our enemies third cousins.

Only losers are war criminals.

258 posted on 05/21/2006 4:57:29 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

I see your point. Allow me to rephrase that. In war, especially a total war like WWII, innocent people are going to die no matter how careful you try to be. And in a total war you must be willing to do things that most decent people would find questionable if you want to win. The problem I have is with people trying to equate the wholesale genocidal actions of the Nazis, with actions that were meant to stop them. There is a good reason why they say war is hell.


259 posted on 05/21/2006 5:00:28 AM PDT by frankiep (Visualize Whirled Peas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Times, as well as standard of conduct change.

I believe that we may like to think that, but I'm afraid it just is not true. I guarantee you that if we were in a fight like WWII right now, that the so called standards we have today would be thrown out the window if it meant ensuring our nation's survival.

Remember, the very survival of the free world was in serious jeopardy.

260 posted on 05/21/2006 5:04:33 AM PDT by frankiep (Visualize Whirled Peas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson