Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Root Cause of the Immigration Crisis
To the Point Newsletter, Dr. Jack Wheeler ^ | 19 May 2006 | Dr. Jack Wheeler

Posted on 05/20/2006 6:10:27 PM PDT by lancer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: Justanobody

"I was in a class where we investigated the 100 year plan to destroy America that began around 1900. I have to find my notes and review the steps. We are very close, as I recall."

Well, since I believe this effort was started by the Soviet Union, I would have to doubt the importance of this plan. The Communists didn't come into power a Russia until 1917, and it was a while before their own crisis settled down to the point where they could work very actively on subverting us (I don't know exactly when that began). Nonetheless, it would be interesting to take a look at.


41 posted on 05/20/2006 7:45:29 PM PDT by strategofr (H-mentor:"pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it"Hillary's Secret War,Poe,p.198)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: lancer
Most Americans are not aware, or they wish to not think about it, but not everyone who enters our country illegally comes to seek employment. For several decades now, the United States has been a beacon for every thug and criminal throughout Latin America. They are attracted to our mostly meek and unarmed population, lax laws, forgiving courts, and prisons that would be country clubs in their homeland.

As we don't know exactly how many illegal aliens are currently within our borders, we certainly have no way of knowing how many of these thugs are among us. But we do know that they are well armed, well organized, ruthless, and have easily taken over drug trafficking operations within the United States.

When it comes time to deport these illegal alien criminals, they will not go peacefully. These criminals have the capability of launching a very effective insurgency within the U.S., and I fully expect them to do so. Believe me, their capacity for violence is hard for most Americans to comprehend.

Before this illegal alien invasion is driven from our country, I fully expect to see IEDs exploding beside our highways, and tactical air strikes being run in down town Los Angeles.
42 posted on 05/20/2006 7:45:59 PM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer

BTTT


43 posted on 05/20/2006 7:47:11 PM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo; potlatch; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; devolve; OXENinFLA; bitt; La Enchiladita; JustPiper; ...

CONNECTING THE GLOBALIZATION DOTS



Property frenzy in Baja California
Save a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.comSave a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.com  Email a link to this articleEmail a link to this article  Printer-friendly version of this articlePrinter-friendly version of this article  View a list of the most popular articles on our siteView a list of the most popular articles on our site  

As megaport is planned 50 miles south of Ensenada, secrecy surrounds land sales in impoverished area

UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

April 24, 2006


CHARLIE NEUMAN / Union-Tribune
Punta Colonet is likely to be transformed over the next decade into a megaport that will help to handle the increasing amount of cargo coming from eastern Asia.
PUNTA COLONET, Mexico – After Mexico picked this uninhabited inlet as the site for a new west coast megaport two years ago, beachfront land that held value only to surfers and a handful of fishermen suddenly became hot property.

Since then, global and domestic business executives, Mexico City lawyers, consultants, engineers and even a former Baja California governor have been beating a path along a pot-holed dirt road from the town of Colonet on the trans-peninsular highway to the water's edge five miles away.

Federal officials have yet to announce a bidding competition, but the project has set off a land grab in this impoverished area 50 miles south of Ensenada.

Buyers have snatched up 132 prime acres along a strip of tideland likely to be transformed over the next decade into docks for container ships arriving from Asia with goods destined for America's heartland.

Former Baja California Gov. Ernesto Ruffo Appel and a partner have bought one such parcel, and also a nearby mountaintop and rights of way to move rock that might be used for the massive project.

“We have purchased 2,500 hectares (more than 600 acres),” Ruffo said. “We've spent about $3 million so far. That shows how serious we are.”

Graphic:

Punta Colonet land grab
Additional groups are said to be maneuvering for other choice sites. Secrecy obscures much of the wheeling and dealing.

The Punta Colonet property frenzy is changing life in a rural region populated in part by families who have held the unproductive land for a half century in collective ejido arrangements. The influx of cash has split apart communal groups, pitting family against family, brother against brother.

José Luis González learned he was being cut out of a windfall coming to Ejido Villa Morelos last August, a day before 18 other members of the group gathered at a bank to receive checks for selling several parcels of oceanfront property.

González, his brother Rubén and two uncles have since taken their fellow ejido members to what is known as an agrarian resolution court, seeking a slice of the proceeds.

“I don't know exactly how much they got. They aren't letting us know,” González said recently while taking a break from preparing a cornfield for planting. “But now they're driving fancy cars and wearing nice clothes.”

Several sources with knowledge of the transaction estimate that $10 million to $15 million was paid for the land.

“No one is against the development,” González said. “We're glad the port's being built because it's needed. We're against how we're being treated.”

Numerous individuals refused to be quoted for publication because of the sensitivity of the subject or fear of financial repercussions. Others didn't return phone calls and e-mails. Baja California Economic Development Secretary Sergio Tagliapietra declined to comment through a spokeswoman because he “doesn't want to contribute to the speculation.”

A federal official said the government plans to encourage investors from across the United States and Asia to take part in the competitive bidding process that is expected to start in the next month or two.

U-shaped port project

The port project is being driven by the inability of other ports, especially those at Long Beach and Los Angeles, to handle increases of cargo coming from eastern Asia. Shipments from there are growing 15 percent annually and are expected to double by 2020.


CHARLIE NEUMAN / Union-Tribune
In Colonet, a bus crossed over the San Rafael River, which empties into the ocean at Punta Colonet when the river is flowing.
Punta Colonet will serve only container ships, said Ensenada port director Carlos Jáuregui González, who will be involved with the government's marketing and bidding process. The port will be configured in a U-shape, with each leg having several berths and cranes to handle cargo. One leg will also comprise the project's breakwater.

Nearly 7,000 acres, 97 percent of them water and 3 percent tidelands, will be devoted to the project. A harbor must be dredged deep enough to accommodate several megaships at once.

Within seven years, Punta Colonet could be processing the equivalent of a million 20-foot-long containers annually, 6 million by 2025.

“It's actually going to be bigger than Los Angeles and Long Beach together,” said Albert Fierstine, a consultant who was the Port of Los Angeles' business development director.

Together, those ports handled 13 million TEUs in 2004, or $200 billion worth of cargo. TEU, or 20-foot equivalent units, is the standard measurement in the shipping industry to quantify container traffic.

The port and rail projects are expected to require an investment of $4 billion to $5 billion. But the development of the region, including a city with thousands of inhabitants that would spread farther east into ejido lands and support the cargo operations, is expected to attract as much as $22.2 billion in investment.

Big names

According to area residents, including Ruffo, Hutchison Port Holdings, the parent of Ensenada's cargo and cruise ship operator, is behind the purchase of the Ejido Villa Morelos parcel. The name on land transfer records, however, is Ernesto Roberto Tatay.

González said that when the judge in the Ejido Morelos case asked who Tatay is and where he lives, Tatay's attorney said he didn't know. The lawyer has been ordered to produce the information.

Officials of Hutchison Ports Mexico, a subsidiary of Hutchison Whampoa Ltd., the world's largest port operator and developer, did not return phone calls and an e-mail seeking comment on Punta Colonet land purchases.

“They are not buying anything now,” said Isaura Puppo, secretary for Hutchison executive Mike Power. She declined to confirm whether the company is behind the Ejido Villa Morelos acquisition.


CHARLIE NEUMAN / Union-Tribune
Jesús Lara, who owns more than 900 acres atop a cliff overlooking Punta Colonet, displayed a map last month showing the parcels that will be affected by the port project.
Punta Colonet landowners and residents of Colonet, a town of about 5,000 populated mostly by area ejido members and farmworkers transplanted from southern Mexico, said they have been given no official information about plans for the region.

However, Jesús Lara, who owns more than 900 acres atop a cliff overlooking the proposed site, has been waging an one-man effort to learn about the project, the land purchases and the companies and people involved.

After buying the cliff-top property about five years ago, he was in the process of clearing land to develop a golf course, a hotel and restaurant when he got wind of the port project about eight months ago.

“I was just starting a lot of work there, and these guys came and bought (the parcels below his).” he said. “And I said, 'What am I doing?' Then I stopped.”

Lara grew up as a member of a nearby ejido, farmed in the area and operates a cross-border trucking firm from Chula Vista. Bilingual and bicultural, he has sought out officials to discuss the project and has become an important contact for many of the parties interested in the port development.

“Everybody is thinking now is the time to buy the land cheap. If you're down there every day, you'll see helicopters, planes and four-wheel drive vehicles coming in,” he said.


CHARLIE NEUMAN / Union-Tribune
José Luis González was cut out of a windfall coming to other Ejido Villa Morelos members who sold parcels of property.
According to Lara and Ruffo, Hutchison paid about $5 per square meter compared to the average $7 per square meter Ruffo and Ensenada businessman Roberto Curiel Amaya paid Ejido Heroes de Chapultepec for their tideland property.

Initially, Ruffo said, he was acting as a consultant for interested parties but as the project appeared more feasible, he decided to pair with Curiel, a builder with extensive interests in sand, gravel and rock, to play a larger role under a company they formed called Puerto Colonet Infrastructura.

“I will certainly be a bidder,” he said. “Now we are trying to put together a consortium.”

Besides the two communal groups that have sold land, three others – Ejido Veinte Siete de Enero, Ejido Diaz Ordáz and Ejido Mexico, which is also known as Ejido Colonet – hold property in the area where the port, railroad and new city are to be built.

It's up to developers to secure land for the port project, said port director Jáuregui.

Property for a 180-mile rail line from the port to Mexicali is likely to be obtained through eminent domain by the state of Baja California, he said. From the port, it is expected to run along the San Rafael River valley north to the border near Mexicali.

'Now money's involved'

The Ejido Morelos judicial dispute, Jáuregui said, “could interfere with the project if it is not properly solved.”

Once forbidden from selling their land, the collective groups are permitted to do so under a 1992 change in Mexican federal law.

After that change, José Luis and Rubén González and two of their uncles bought a few parcels to farm on their own from the other members of Ejido Villa Morelos, which was formed in 1958.

“Those of us who were cut out of the cake are the pioneers of the ejido,” Rubén González said.

“The coastal property that was sold is common area belonging to all (22 members). Nobody complained before, but now money's involved.”

Interest in Punta Colonet continues to grow among visitors and locals alike, Lara said. Representatives of four of the ejidos and a group of business leaders from San Quintin, the coastal town to the south, met with him recently to learn what he knows about the project and the land transfers.

Lara has no plans to sell his cliff-top property, which extends to the tidelands below that will make up the bottom of the U-shaped facility.

“I won't sell,” he said, “because I can't get now what it's going to be worth eventually.”


Diane Lindquist: (619) 293-1812; diane.lindquist@uniontrib.com







 Sponsored Links

44 posted on 05/20/2006 7:53:12 PM PDT by Smartass (Vaya con Dios - And forgive us our trash baskets as we forgive those who put trash in our baskets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: varon
I hope someone sends a copy of this excellent resitation of what America should be to every person in responsibility in the U.S. of A, especially the yellow backed, pinko, bleeding heart liberals in the U.S. congress. Perhaps a copy a day to each of them might get some attention.
Semper Fi
45 posted on 05/20/2006 7:59:12 PM PDT by bism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody

I, too, have a problem with the woman bashing.

'nuff said.


46 posted on 05/20/2006 8:00:10 PM PDT by upchuck (Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Supported in part by the MSM.


47 posted on 05/20/2006 8:02:02 PM PDT by gpapa (Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"The root cause is very simple and can be summed up in one word: politicians..."

Somebody is voting for these a$$holes.

48 posted on 05/20/2006 8:02:13 PM PDT by Radix (Why do they call them Morons when they don't know so much? Shouldn't they be called Lessons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68
I agree with you as usual MAC.

Wahhabism is like a cancer and we have way too much of it right here at home.

49 posted on 05/20/2006 8:05:09 PM PDT by upchuck (Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lancer

We're going to get deep and serious here, and I'm going to ask you to reflect on a number of previous articles. We're not going to fulminate against George Bush, illegal immigrant-hiring businesses and the whores in the Senate they pay off, Democrats who see every illegal alien as a potential welfare recipient who will vote for them, or even Reconquista Mexicans attempting to recapture the American Southwest.

Are these the author's words? From the article?


50 posted on 05/20/2006 8:07:10 PM PDT by JustPiper (We will be Governed by Rule of Law NOT by Mob Rule Senator !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
Are the author's words? From the article?

Yes, indeed. You can verify that by going to the link. You should be able to read the first couple of paragraphs without a subscription.

51 posted on 05/20/2006 8:16:14 PM PDT by lancer (If you are not with us, you are against us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

That's in a beautiful area with nice beaches. We used to go down there in our younger days.


52 posted on 05/20/2006 8:19:20 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lancer

For those of you who want to send a solid message to Congress, check out this website: http://www.send-a-brick.com/ Click on the FoxNews video for the full story behind the brick campaign.


53 posted on 05/20/2006 8:29:55 PM PDT by lancer (If you are not with us, you are against us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

I'm really amazed at the reaction. I thought I'd be villified, but many seem to agree.

Yes we have been guilted, but who feels the guilt? Primarily the women I think. Any of the men who say they feel guilty are probably courting the female vote (or something else that women have to offer).


54 posted on 05/20/2006 9:02:27 PM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lancer

Reading this almost caused my heart to break.


55 posted on 05/20/2006 9:09:07 PM PDT by Bahbah (“KERRY LIED!! SCHOLARLY ATTRIBUTION DIED!!!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer
The immigration crisis may become worse due to future demographic changes in the United States.

Reproduction in the Western world has declined not only due to economic pressures on families, but due in part to the feminization of society and the resultant reduction in family size. In addition in the United States 40,000,000 souls have been denied the opportunity to become citizens by the scapel of abortionists over the last 30+ years. To sustain our population just over 2.0 children per family is necessary, and the only way to keep that level of reproduction is to continually expand the level of immigration. Liberal Senate Democrats and Republicans wish to expand the level of immigration dramatically with an eye on future voters to sustain them in power. Importing less educated and poorer immigrants from other countries is their ultimate goal. No longer will American immigration policy encourage the best and brightest to emigrate, but just the opposite will occur damaging the American ideal of assimilation that my great-grandparents fully embraced over 150 years ago.
56 posted on 05/20/2006 9:33:14 PM PDT by gpapa (Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer

Excellent article!


57 posted on 05/20/2006 9:34:26 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer

What we're up against is the prevailing PC notion that mankind has evolved to the point where war is no longer necessary. The result is multiculturalism, and the quaint notion that nothing you happen to believe in is worth defending. This state of affairs allows, indeed fosters tyranny, but Leftist elitists seem blind to this.


58 posted on 05/21/2006 4:02:13 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer

At some point, deep in the bowels of the White House, it was decided that Mexico wasn't ever going to fix itself, so there were two options. We could invade and do it for them, or we could open the border, let American capitalism, ideas, jobs, flow freely south. They didn't foresee a few potholes...Mexicans flowing north by the millions, depopulating their own country. Well, that's fixable. Just become one country. Reconquista works just fine. Oh, wait. It's illegal...nobody told the American people we were going to encourage invasion. Never mind, 'we're going to take things away from you for the common good.'...like sovereignty, freedom, law and order, American culture, language, mores...Nobody should be surprised if Hillary ends up in the White House.


59 posted on 05/21/2006 4:10:41 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

You just knew this was going on. That fellow who won't sell his property will probably assume room temperature.


60 posted on 05/21/2006 4:15:58 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson