Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/19/2006 6:56:05 AM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Dark Skies

WTH? I'm not sure if I should search for my tinfoil or duck from the looming black helicopter across from my lawn.


2 posted on 05/19/2006 6:59:07 AM PDT by dagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada

Uh . . . NAFTA already DOES include Canada.
3 posted on 05/19/2006 6:59:14 AM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

He'd have a helluva lot of work to do with only two years left in his term (barring John Conyers).

4 posted on 05/19/2006 7:00:22 AM PDT by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

Exactly. And the fact that Bush has been pursuing this agenda without telling the US people, is worse than despicable.


5 posted on 05/19/2006 7:01:22 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.

What the hell kind of goofball, tin foil nonsense is this??? NAFTA has always included Canada. That's why it's called NAFTA...as in North America.

7 posted on 05/19/2006 7:02:27 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

Interesting. It connects some of the dots for a clearer picture. The question is can we stop it?


8 posted on 05/19/2006 7:03:20 AM PDT by maxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
I will not reject this out of hand, but when it comes to multi-government conspiracies, I set the bar high.

Links to a .pdf of an authentic CFR document would have been appreciated. That, and proper spelling of Fox's first name. Sloppy.

9 posted on 05/19/2006 7:03:48 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Religious Persecution is ALWAYS wrong. Unless Chinese or Muslims are doing it. </sarcasm>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

If this were true, George W Bush would be the biggest, worst traitor of them all, and we have a splendid array of them these days. This would outdo Jimmah Cawtuh and the Demons from Dogpatch.

I hope it isn't true. But I don't want to put my head in the sand. So, if it is true, I say, "Come, Lord Jesus!".


11 posted on 05/19/2006 7:04:42 AM PDT by RoadTest (The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? (Jer. 17:9))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
Good morning,
i am not sure what to think about this article...It looks like bull sh*t...Too much subjective words and the fact that canada has been long ago included in Nafta...Looks like a blend of the past and the present...Will wait and see.

Best regards.
12 posted on 05/19/2006 7:05:11 AM PDT by astoundedlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

This is from Jerome R. Corsi the same guy who wrote "Unfit for Command"?


14 posted on 05/19/2006 7:05:34 AM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
Evidence that this writer is talking through his hat is in this article itself. The writer claims that Bush intends to "expand NAFTA to include Canada." Helloooo. NAFTA already INCLUDES Canada.

We do not have a problem with "free trade" across the Canadian border because Canada is a developed country with a high standard of living. Canadians are not lined up by the thousands trying to sneak across the border into the US.

The problem is that Mexico, unlike Canada, is a badly-run, third-world country which is deliberately using the US to outsource its poverty problem. That's why we need to slam the Mexican border shut, and need to worry far less about the Canadian border.

Any fool can see the difference between Canada and Mexico, except the writer of this article, apparently.

P.S. My primary is over, but because of certain legal and ethical problems, the incumbent, Charles Taylor may withdraw/be forced out, and I am in the running to be chosen as the replacement nominee for Congress in the 11th District of NC. For more information, see the article below, and my website. I still need your help.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "What a Week! What a Week!"

15 posted on 05/19/2006 7:07:55 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments.

OK. Research time. Who are the members of the U.S working group? Is this group now meeting with it's Mexican counterpart? Has the group issued any public reports or press releases?

16 posted on 05/19/2006 7:08:28 AM PDT by RodgerD (Reject the Amnesty and Immigration Explosion Bill of 2006. No to 100 million new aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies; All
No comment ( yet ) but here are the borders links:

For "Thunder on the Border," click the picture:


17 posted on 05/19/2006 7:08:56 AM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

This sounds like Bircher B.S. to me. I'm not buying it.


18 posted on 05/19/2006 7:09:26 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Some Dare Call It Amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets: An Empirical Study



19 posted on 05/19/2006 7:10:16 AM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

I think that a North American Confederation of states is inevitable. When it will happen is a little hard to call, but say within 25 years. Read it and weep.


20 posted on 05/19/2006 7:10:41 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

http://www.spp.gov/

Well everyone, let's have a look at what they say they're up to.


25 posted on 05/19/2006 7:13:03 AM PDT by RodgerD (Reject the Amnesty and Immigration Explosion Bill of 2006. No to 100 million new aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

It might be Bush's plan, but I doubt that the Canadians and Mexicans will go along.


26 posted on 05/19/2006 7:13:27 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

""our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.""

That's a Satanic lie. Our security is our Air Force, Marines, Army, Navy and Coast Guard, in that order, and what there is of a Border Patrol and the Immigration Service and Airport Security.

Our prosperity is Blessed private enterprise, the freer of government the better, and American toughness and ingenuity, such as survived the Depression, won two world wars and still is the earth's only bulwark against tyrranny.

God damn the devils (they already are) who are attempting to dismantel this God-given land of ours and join it to harlots and thieves.

The Skull & Bones and CFR people are hellions seeking to see how many they can take to Hell with them. They don't give a rap for anything but power that massages their egos - same thing as Kim Il Sung.


27 posted on 05/19/2006 7:13:59 AM PDT by RoadTest (The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? (Jer. 17:9))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

Corsi did very sloppy, minimal research for this-almost as though he is trying to discredit the whole idea. As others have mentioned, NAFTA has always included Canada. However, there really is (or was) a plan to expand NAFTA by including South and Central America in something called the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). However, the prospective SA and CA members were less than lukewarm, prefering to strengthen ties among themselves and with the EU due to their distrust of DC. Anyone interested can do a google search on FTAA for themselves,especially on the Miami summit where the FTAA was declared 'dead in the water'.


28 posted on 05/19/2006 7:14:02 AM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson