Posted on 05/19/2006 6:56:03 AM PDT by Dark Skies
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.
Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?
We thank him for his service to our country (torpedoing the USS John F'ing Kerry), but that doesn't mean we have to follow him anywhere.
This?
Economic marriage between the USA and Canada made economic sense, but hitching the American economy to a corrupt third-world narco-state like Mexico was simply stupid. It also had the effect of destroying Mexican agriculture which could not compete in a free market with efficient American agribusinesses - so the peasants facing starvation head al norte.
Yes.......
Well, I had to wonder about her when she wrote an article that claimed that since Barbara and Laura Bush are pro-choice, Harriet Miers must be also. After all, they're all women in GWB's life.
That's crazy.
At the very least, the woman is fallible.
That's exactly what I thought and the very reason I posted it.
And frowned on in MOST societies...
Seems like the urge to merge is everlasting...unfortunately
the drive to divide kicks in after everyone realizes they
just can't get along.
Bookmarked.
Oh, not! Not the Coucil on Foreign Relations! Why they're a front for the Freemasons, and the CIA, and the Queen of England. /LaRouch paranoid mode.
Trans-Texas Corridor as close as five years
Durant Daily Democrat ^ | May 12, 2006 | Margie Bull
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1631477/posts
Posted on 05/12/2006 7:21:53 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The Trans-Texas Corridor project, proposing four to six toll truck lanes and four to six toll passenger lanes from Laredo to Oklahoma, may be as near as five years.
Greg Massey, a member of the Oklahoma Highway Authority, recently met with the Texas Department of Transportation. “We really didn't get any new information. The project is still proposed to cross over and connect with I-35 to come into Oklahoma. TxDOT did say they are five years out on the project,” Massey said.
Ten different routes are proposed for the corridor. The major variations in the routes follow the three represented on the map in light blue and dark blue.
Oklahomans are pushing for the widening of U.S. 69/75 to bring the traffic through Durant and up to Tulsa. Proposed routes 9, 10, 11 and 12 on the map represent the ones that may come our way. At the Texas border, these routes go south on U.S. 75 to U.S. 380 and connect with the other routes to Laredo.
Route number 5 on the map is TxDOT's recommended preferred alternative as described in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement document. This route has a centerline length of approximately 521 miles and an area of approximately 5,307 square miles. The northern point is at the Texas/Oklahoma border at I-35. The corridor heads southeast across US 75 near McKinney to US 380 where it curves southwest across I-30, I-20, I-45 and continues southwest near Temple, around Austin and ends at the Texas/Mexico border near Laredo.
This preferred alternative is subject to change pending the public hearing process, tentatively scheduled for Summer 2006.
The Texas Department of Transportation will take public comments by writing to: TxDOT Turnpike Authority Division, TTC-35 Comments, P.O. Box 14707, Austin, TX 78761-4704. More information on the proposal and another place for on-line public comments is at keeptexasmoving.com. Maps, population and traffic data are available on the Web site as well as the environmental impact study.
Some groups are for the proposal and others are against it. One group has formed to oppose the proposed route and established their own Web site at corridorwatch.org.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.