Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Howstuffworks.com: How The Da Vinci Code Doesn't Work
Howstuffworks.com ^ | Tracy V. Wilson

Posted on 05/18/2006 10:14:29 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 05/18/2006 10:14:32 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Next you'll be telling me that Sherlock Holmes only imagined Dr. Moriarity....


2 posted on 05/18/2006 10:17:01 AM PDT by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I don't understand why so much credence is given to Da Vinci's INTERPRETATION of the Last Supper. I mean, was the guy there or something? No. So why does HIS painting a person appearing to be female mean Jesus was married.

Furthermore, I personally don't care if Jesus was married. The Bible says he died without sin. Unless you consider sex with your spouse "sin", he died without sin.


3 posted on 05/18/2006 10:18:07 AM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

bad second link to something on freepers that 'doesn't exist on this server'

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1634449/tv.htm


4 posted on 05/18/2006 10:19:13 AM PDT by AgThorn (Bush is my president, but he needs to protect our borders. FIRST, before any talk of "Amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Wow, these guys should investigate how the DNC works?
5 posted on 05/18/2006 10:21:14 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Proud soldier in the American Army of Occupation..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AgThorn

It doesn't exist on Howstuffworks.com's site either. Sony has moved the page.


6 posted on 05/18/2006 10:21:45 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I just don't understand why Christians give any notice to the the da Vinci Code.
God's personal emissary to humankind was brutally beaten and nailed to a cross. Surely we mortals can endure a novel.

Food gained by fraud tastes sweet to a man, but he ends up with a mouth full of gravel.

7 posted on 05/18/2006 10:22:58 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

apparently there are a lot of links on this article that give the same result, i.e. not exist on this server.


8 posted on 05/18/2006 10:24:01 AM PDT by AgThorn (Bush is my president, but he needs to protect our borders. FIRST, before any talk of "Amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rustyncrusty

Bump for later read.


9 posted on 05/18/2006 10:24:38 AM PDT by rustyncrusty (Where liberty dwells, there is my country. - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
She imbeds the receiver in a bar of soap

That is pretty ingenius. The French would never discover anything in a bar of soap.

10 posted on 05/18/2006 10:26:53 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AgThorn

So, the bottom line is, everyone is getting all worked up as to whether this piece of fiction is really fiction. Millions of people are going to go see the movie this weekend. The makers of the film are going to get rich. And, the debate will continue.............


11 posted on 05/18/2006 10:31:09 AM PDT by Concho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Self-ping


12 posted on 05/18/2006 10:33:30 AM PDT by dpa5923 (Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Phi is an irrational number. It's more accurately expressed as (1+ã5)/2 than as the number 1.618.

Many points here are picky, picky indeed.
Because I'm a math teacher, I'll tackle this one.
To say that phi is 1.618 is about as accurate as stating that pi is 3.1416. That is, close enough for most things. (In fact, we jokingly refer to March 14 as "Pi Day" because it's 3/14, at least in the U.S.)

Phi is the Golden Ratio, which is found throughout history in artwork. It's the ratio of the Parthenon and probably the ratio of the screen on which you'd view this film (unless you're waiting for the video on TV).

Saying that a number is plus or minus the square root of 5 divided by two (adding a half, of course) is a bit clunky. I could just as easily describe it as the nth Fibonacci number divided by the (n-1)th Fibonacci number as n approaches infinity. But that would be wrong. (No, wait! That would actually be correct, but it'd be wrong to try to express it that way to someone who didn't ... ah, forget it. 1.618 is good enough for government work.)

13 posted on 05/18/2006 10:34:12 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Without spoilers, do you think (blabberblabber) killed (mumblemumble) or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Can you get these guys to look into "E.T" for me? I've got a boatload of Reese's Pieces stockpiled.


14 posted on 05/18/2006 10:35:50 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandbar
The attack on Jesus is only tangential to an attack on the validity and reliability of scripture. The point of the subversive aspect of the movie is that the church from the earliest was involved in a cover-up. Thus, everything in scripture is open to being debunked, including Jesus' death and resurrection and his life without sin.

I don't see how anyone can see this as anything but an attack on Christianity. If the subject were Moses or Mohamed and a conspiracy begun by their earliest followers, Jews and Muslims would be in outrage.
15 posted on 05/18/2006 10:39:00 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Careful examination of the painting also reveals that the "disembodied" hand really belongs to Peter,

I thought it belonged to the waiter, who looked suspisciously like Mel Brooks.

16 posted on 05/18/2006 10:39:22 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Without spoilers, do you think (blabberblabber) killed (mumblemumble) or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

yeah, but I really want to know is who they claim is the last living descendant of Jesus?

I saw a somewhat interesting program that was a reality check on The Da Vinci Code. The most interesting section of the program was the footage and description of a ritual at the seashore celebrating the lengendary day two of the Marys from the gospel came ashore in France (Gaul at the time) as refugees from the Holy Land, and Mary Magdalene was carrying an alabaster vase, which the celebrants consider to be the Holy Grail.

There was a girl child with them, and some claim it was Mary Magdalene's daughter, but the local priest says oral history makes her the Egyptian servant of the women.

Now it is possible that the San Grail (Holy Grail) was miswritten as Sang Real (Blood Royal) as the book claims, but it could literally have been Holy Blood/Royal Blood, not a child of Christ.

The alabaster vase may have been used to catch the blood of Christ, as I have vague recollection that corpses in those days were drained and washed of blood before wrapping for burial. So, this part of the oral history may have a germ of truth. Some of the followers of Christ may have bourne a container of his blood with them when they fled the Holy Land.

Still I'd like someone to FReep me a spoiler and tell me who they claim is the current living descendent of Christ. I heard the audience was incredulous when this surprise ending was revealed.


17 posted on 05/18/2006 10:45:40 AM PDT by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
"Still I'd like someone to FReep me a spoiler and tell me who they claim is the current living descendent of Christ. I heard the audience was incredulous when this surprise ending was revealed."


18 posted on 05/18/2006 10:54:20 AM PDT by Tweak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
I'd like someone to FReep me a spoiler and tell me who they claim is the current living descendent of Christ. I heard the audience was incredulous when this surprise ending was revealed.

It's a French thing, so:


19 posted on 05/18/2006 10:56:32 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jla
> just don't understand why Christians give any notice to the the da Vinci Code

My guess is most don't.
My guess is that almost all
the internet "buzz"

is from people who
work for advertising firms
and blanket the web

pretending to be
"outraged Christians" all the while
pumping up the buzz . . .

20 posted on 05/18/2006 11:01:28 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson