Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"A HOUSE DIVIDED" - Pukin's FReeperversary Rant

Posted on 05/17/2006 7:47:58 AM PDT by Pukin Dog

Edited on 05/17/2006 8:30:59 AM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 3,681 next last
To: pissant; Pukin Dog
It's that horse-barn thing. Too late.

However, in real life, when you realize your horse is out of the barn, what do you do? Do you throw up your hands and resign yourself to the loss of your horse. I suggest that a sensible approach is to go out and find your horse and bring him back. You may not be successful in that, but not trying guarantees failure.

561 posted on 05/17/2006 10:07:16 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Are you watching the senate?

On my way into the house from my front porch, I "think" I just heard FNC report that the senate is close to passing a "guest worker" program! Tell me I heard wrong!


562 posted on 05/17/2006 10:07:49 AM PDT by onyx (Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
I'm a strong proponent of the 2nd amendment. The Democrats are controlled by a predominantly anti-gun agenda. I vote Republican to keep the Democrats from having enough votes to pass more gun control laws.

My rep, Mike Simpson, is not a strong proponent of the 2nd amendment. He has a Democrat challenger who claims to be a strong 2nd amendment supporter. The Democrat is also a union member who oozes socialist remarks at every turn. I have no doubt that his claims of being pro-2nd amendment would be squelched by senior Democrats putting the squeeze on a junior member to "get in line" with the Democrat party. I won't let that happen.

563 posted on 05/17/2006 10:08:02 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Great post, Dog. We can agree to disagee and have a civil debate over where the Republican party should take us. But come November we'd better close ranks and keep the Democrat cretins from power.


564 posted on 05/17/2006 10:08:27 AM PDT by rockthecasbah (Don't wait for 6 strong men to take you to church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic

They're not "rabid", they're just "One Issue Wonders".


565 posted on 05/17/2006 10:08:30 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: zarf

I don't believe conservatives want to 'nuke' brown people. They're frustrated and extremely worried about the War on Terror, Iraq, Iran, Israel, NK, and leaky borders -- not to mention the usual suspects in the senate. (It certainly doesn't help to get up in the morning, turn on the TV and find out that Fatso Kennedy, your senior senator, is agreeing in public with President Bush.)


566 posted on 05/17/2006 10:09:08 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

So am I and I've been here for over a year and a half. Are some FReepers more equal than others in your mind?


567 posted on 05/17/2006 10:09:17 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (DemocRATs- the CULTURE OF TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat

See posts 193, 267, and 402. I've been wrangling horses on FR the whole time I've been here.


568 posted on 05/17/2006 10:09:18 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: Peach
They are opinion shapers. we have all seen screen names recently that we've never seen before although they signed up years ago. They come here to stir dissent and create an atmosphere of anger and drive a wedge between Republicans.

Peach, the problem is that there are conservatives who are legitimately upset with certain things this administration has done. Falsely accusing those of us who have been GOP supporters for years does not help the conservative cause either. It just drives people away from the Party. I know there are trolls on here, but that doesn't mean any conservative who is very upset with Bush right now is a troll.
569 posted on 05/17/2006 10:09:22 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: kitkat
The democrats are, whether they all know it or not, COMMUNISTS.

I don't believe all of them are. And in fact I don't believe that even a majority of them are. Now if you want to say, "The democRAT leadership are...," or, "Those controlling the democRAT Party are...," then you have a genuine point that I cannot refute. But I know a lot of rank and file democRATs who are basically good Americans. People like Zell Miller who put their country ahead of party.

570 posted on 05/17/2006 10:09:22 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ
The best I can gather from this post is that there can be no debate because if you disagree with the Bush stance you are evil.

Then you have some major problems with reading comprehension.

571 posted on 05/17/2006 10:09:42 AM PDT by Coop (Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Fine by me. I'll grant you all points to get past the pissin contest.

You're correct. For whatever reason, the voters, incidentally on the same side of the incumbent, voted to keep DeWine, thus encouraging RINO's to believe that the less conservative they act, the more chance they have of getting re-elected.

So what, in addition to casting our vote against the milquetoast candidate in a primary, can we do to encourage the machinery of the party to support more conservative candidates? Otherwise, even if the GOP maintains control of the govmt, will they eventually trend away from DeLays and toward the DeWines?

Or is voting as the losing loyal conservative minority in our own "party" all we should ever aspire to?


572 posted on 05/17/2006 10:09:47 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan
"encouragement from Pukin Dog" to be civil does that? My my, what a thin skin you have.

Well, just read the thread, friend...

573 posted on 05/17/2006 10:09:55 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
In ranting before my coffee was ready, I mistakenly attributed Lincoln Chaffee to Massachusetts instead of Rhode Island. Can you fix it for me, so I don't come of as a TOTAL loser?

*************

Hey. I'm from Massachusetts and I fell for it this morning. I'm blaming lack of coffee as well.

574 posted on 05/17/2006 10:10:00 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Happy FReeperversay!

Frankly, I have no comment on your “rant”, but you sure hit a hornet’s nest swinging your bat.

This sure is an entertaining thread on an otherwise slow day. Thanks!!

575 posted on 05/17/2006 10:10:03 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Nothing witty hereā€¦ move on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Yes, please fix the Chaffee attribution. We in MA have more than enough to be embarrassed about.


576 posted on 05/17/2006 10:10:23 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

I can't figure out why *any* of them voted against me.

Maybe Shelby is OK, but Brownback has turned into a complete RINO on this issue.


577 posted on 05/17/2006 10:10:31 AM PDT by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
"We have no need for irrational angry people."

After reading your whole post, this was kind of an amusing concluding comment. I'm not saying I don't agree with your comments regarding those who threaten to ditch the Republican Party. It is just clear you are a little angry about the whole thing (irrationally or not).

578 posted on 05/17/2006 10:10:41 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Then you might want to show that in your posts because my impression from reading them here (I just do not have time to investigate all prior posts before madly typing my "pearls of wisdom" needed on a thread) is that you were one of the "destroyers" who believe we can only get the GOP to listen when we make them lose.

And - that - in these times is the recipe for total destruction of this country.


579 posted on 05/17/2006 10:10:44 AM PDT by ClancyJ (To cause a democrat to win is the most effective way to destroy this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: The Return of the King

Any takers?


580 posted on 05/17/2006 10:11:08 AM PDT by Rebelbase (" Bush II: What's good for Mexico is good for America." --FReeper, Vigilanteman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 3,681 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson