Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hunter Suggests NATO Take Over JFK Flattop
Aviation Now ^ | 15 May 06 | Michael Bruno

Posted on 05/16/2006 2:41:32 PM PDT by LSUfan

The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee is suggesting NATO take over the USS John F. Kennedy aircraft carrier, which the U.S. Navy and the Bush administration want to retire early for budget reasons.

(Excerpt) Read more at aviationnow.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Florida; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarrier; congress; cv67; duncanhunter; housearmedservices; jfk; nato; navy; sandiego
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-254 next last
To: LSUfan
Ever done it? Why don't you enlighten us IN DETAIL as to what makes it special?
161 posted on 05/16/2006 5:25:58 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
I'm glad you made it to this thread. Have fun, I need a beer.
162 posted on 05/16/2006 5:27:03 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
And, when you enlighten us, please note, I said 'Carrier' not Airwing, not Armory, not Nuke plant, not Battlegroup, I said CARRIER.
163 posted on 05/16/2006 5:28:59 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
Would you have to turn it over on the way down?
164 posted on 05/16/2006 5:34:13 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
Would you have to turn it over on the way down?
165 posted on 05/16/2006 5:34:15 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
I think SU-30's need a ramp.

Pretty sure that you're right for 2 reasons:

1. Russian carriers use ski jumps, and
2. The Russians have sold them to the Indians, and to date, Indian carriers use ski jumps (at least the new ones do).

166 posted on 05/16/2006 5:53:55 PM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

Comment #167 Removed by Moderator

To: LSUfan

All's fair in smack talk between the services. It's quite another thing when you do it just to be nasty. So how about you do this squid a favor and disagree like an adult. Okay, jarhead?


168 posted on 05/16/2006 6:08:07 PM PDT by Doohickey (Democrats are nothing without a constituency of victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
A great answer. I guess you have suffered enough. LOL. Do yourself a favor? Don't post to me again, I would not want to hurt your feelings again.
169 posted on 05/16/2006 6:09:46 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
Hey no worries, I guess he missed the fact that I was a Marine before I was Navy. Besides, it is always fun when they go personal when they cant answer questions to a challenge. Fun for me, anyway.
170 posted on 05/16/2006 6:11:32 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator

very good


171 posted on 05/16/2006 6:12:03 PM PDT by colonialhk (sooprize sooprize sooprize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Whoa as me! Don't put me on your dreaded "don't post to me list!" What ever shall I do? How will I go on living?

Oh the humanity!

I just love it when squids and rustpickers act all tough!


172 posted on 05/16/2006 6:23:45 PM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

But will it be a WARship? I don't mean some oiler. You say it's already in the works...what class of ship? When will the keel be layed, etc? Details...


173 posted on 05/16/2006 6:28:30 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
Second warning. Dont post to me.......LOL.
174 posted on 05/16/2006 6:30:23 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp
It is likely to be one of the stealth ships, if not a sub.
175 posted on 05/16/2006 6:31:38 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
Put some wind turbines on deck and park her off Martha's Vineyard. Mass. will accept ANYTHING named Kennedy and her name will guarantee an endless supply of hot air.
176 posted on 05/16/2006 6:44:15 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog; LSUfan
You know the Navy doesn't want that ship. It is the only item in the Navy where some actually believe the thing is cursed. Bush1 and Cheney didnt mess up that ship, the DOD did keep her out too long, but her refit was screwed up, and the Captain did not report same out of fear for his own career. He put men and the ship at risk, and should have been relieved long before he finally was. Then the next guy was relieved too.

Go back and read my post Pukin Dog I said Poppy and Cheney ran the AMERICA into the ground as did Slick Willie especially when he deployed her the third time in three years. I can back up what I say also. Just follow me a few lines and I'll show you. Congressional Record 24 February 1994 [Page: S1853] Her stated condition when this article was began August 1993 roughly 8 months into Clintons term minus about 4-6 weeks for time line that senior lifer wrote letter about puts in likely in June 5 months into Clinton's term. But it would take longer than even 7 to get like this.

AUGUST 10, 1993 excerpt {Below Decks chapter}:The America needs constant attention. Commissioned in 1965, it is showing its age. A month before leaving Norfolk, a senior enlisted crew member complained to his congressman: The ship was operating on only two of its six electric generators, without radar and unable to pump fuel. This would be its third six-month cruise in three years, and without the standard 18 months at home for repairs, salt water and full steaming had taken their toll.

You were VF-143 according to my crusie book your squadron was on the AMERICA in the early-mid 1970's. OK to the article. I was a snipe on her for 4 years in the AC&R shop. My job was the ships Air Conditioning and refrigeration plants. That meant I had a good understanding of the electronics heat loads and knew some of the electrical load limitations. Two of six generators underway meant no A/C or no functional chillers. No functional chillers meant such places as V.A.S.T., Operations, Radar, and other equipment would be very limited in function if at all especially in June.

Why no chillers? Because we were one of the biggest single consumers of electricity second maybe to the air craft elevators maybe even the top user. She had 3-150 Ton Capacity York Chillers start draw approx 1200 amps run amps approx 180 amps. We had 6-200 TON York Chillers start amperage approx 1200-1500 est. Run amps 220. We had a 10th unit added in 1980 approx a 350 ton {Not absolute on that I was a short timer} start amps likely 1500 amps run amps 350 est.

Two generators would be primitive operations with boilers, feed water pumps, desal plant, and Fire Pumps etc having first priority. Next would be AC units. My best guess is 2 units at the very most functional and likely 60 degree plus chill water temps. The Twidgets called us when it hit 54 degrees in a panic. The most for certain one functional electronics item would be the gyro. I won't say why but I do know :>}

Doing the first two cruises meant she was ready for serious yard time. From December 90- August 93 she did 2 MED I/O's and a NATO then left on the third. In March 1994 at Pier 12 she had a boiler room explosion as shown here Note as well other explosion 1989. That one was in 6 pump room on the port aft chow line. It killed two grapes as it was a JP-5 pump room. USS AMERICA

She was ran to an early grave because maintenance rotations were missed.

As for the JFK hang that one on Slick Wille. The ship was put in active reserve and was not kept up. The Captain of the ship has no say over what the Pentagon funds and what it does not in the way of shipyard repairs. Some repairs are only shipyard doable. Even to replace an oven in the galley the hanger deck has to be cut open. You were squadron I was ships company and know what it takes to keep them going. Even a nuke carrier will see a 3 month yard period after a 6 month deployment and a 9-12 month yard period after the third one or every 5 years. The auxiliary equipment will demand the attention.

That is what happened after 9/11 to the JFK and the KITTY HAWK. Some Captains paid for some Admirals and a SEC of Nav's wrongs. This one was done in the Pentagon and not on the ship.

177 posted on 05/16/2006 6:46:53 PM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
I'm sorry, my post looks like it was meant to disagree with you, and it wasnt. I have no problem with what you wrote.
178 posted on 05/16/2006 6:50:33 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
No problem. And honestly I have spent time tracking this down. I have the original magazine article as well. When I read it my BP went up quite a few notches. She shouldn't have been done that way. We had older ships ready for the boneyard. Nothing rings true about her and I can even debunk the CVN rumor about the AMERICA she was never planned to be one. It was IKE & not JFK and McNamara made that call. By the time LBJ was in office she was close to float.

Her keel was laid before JFK took office that means critical components such as boilers and hull thickness etc were already layed out. To undo it either way would have added more time than it was worth to the build time at that point.

179 posted on 05/16/2006 6:58:23 PM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
From the article:

"We want the administration to talk to NATO about the John F. Kennedy being a NATO ship," Hunter said. "Typically the United States brings the T-bone steaks and some of our allies bring the plastic forks. The John F. Kennedy might be a center for ... inspiring our allies to do more with respect to defense."

He did not elaborate on more details, but noted that the aircraft carrier hosts helicopter and vertical-lift aircraft.

180 posted on 05/16/2006 7:02:25 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-254 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson