Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President's Immigration speech - Live thread
me | 05/15/2006 | me

Posted on 05/15/2006 4:13:02 PM PDT by devane617

Edited on 05/15/2006 4:38:26 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

I searched but did not see a thread already open for tonights speech. I think this is the most important speech the President will probably make for the remainder of his term.


Mod Note:
This could turn into a whack-a-troll thread. All immigration trolls that would like to participate should post here. It'll be interesting to see if we mods can whack the trolls faster than they can sign up new accounts.
Jim


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: anchorbabies; bohica; borderspeech; bush; bushspeech; criminalaliens; enforcement; govwatch; guestworker; incompetence; invasion; scamnesty; shamnesty; speech; temporaryworker; test; trojanhorse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 3,261-3,277 next last
Comment #1,661 Removed by Moderator

To: old_sage_says
Please send the same message to bfree to make it fair.

Good luck with that.

1,662 posted on 05/15/2006 6:31:05 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1616 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
"The House passes HR4437 a pretty good bill and you say that the American people are unhappy with the House?"

A falling tide lowers all boats.

1,663 posted on 05/15/2006 6:31:10 PM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1650 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
What victory, partial or otherwise? The only new thing in the speech was sending some unarmed National Guard troops to help the Border Patrol shuffle paper. The more appropriate headline would be "More Mush from the Wimp."

Perhaps some of you people should have been more vocal about these problems 5, 10, 20 and 25 years ago.

1,664 posted on 05/15/2006 6:31:11 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1496 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
It takes two years to train border patrol agents, unless you want the standards lowered so that illiterate Mexicans can do the job.

I think some on here would say:

It will be two years until illiterate Mexicans will be doing the job. :-)

1,665 posted on 05/15/2006 6:31:22 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1573 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper

I don't doubt that these are his heartfelt beliefs.
But Presidents take an oath of office to enforce our laws, not their heartfelt beliefs. To do otherwise is to make a king out of the Presidency, to put us under the rule of men instead of the rule of law.


1,666 posted on 05/15/2006 6:31:36 PM PDT by Pelham (jobs Americans won't do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1510 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

Yeah, but "on board" whom?


1,667 posted on 05/15/2006 6:31:38 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1631 | View Replies]

To: meema
ROTFLMAO, TSR!!! What a sad night for those of us who voted for him twice, and hung on for more than 4 years.

Well, I voted for him the first time, and I've kicked myself from time to time for that action. However, to be fair, Bush's enforcement provisions impress me as a good start, and I hope he sticks to them. I wouldn't dare legalize or guest-worker these people, as I'm sure some of these people want to remake the S.W. USA into Aztlan, Republica del Norte, or just plain ol' Mexico.

1,668 posted on 05/15/2006 6:31:39 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (One flag--American. One language--English. One allegiance--to America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1345 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

Move from Who-ville?


1,669 posted on 05/15/2006 6:32:16 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1651 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

Make that two:) count me in!


1,670 posted on 05/15/2006 6:32:16 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1631 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Nita Nupress

"Third, we need to hold employers to account for the workers they hire. It is against the law to hire someone who is in this country illegally. Yet businesses often cannot verify the legal status of their employees, because of the widespread problem of document fraud. Therefore, comprehensive immigration reform must include a better system for verifying documents and work eligibility".

I hope this doesn't mean until we develop a better system for identification these employers will skate?


What it means is here comes your "National ID Card."

Papers, please?

Before anyone goes into reflex-flame mode, think it through. There is no other logical interpretation of that statement.

1,671 posted on 05/15/2006 6:32:20 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 918 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

bttt


1,672 posted on 05/15/2006 6:32:21 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Feb. 9, 2005: Bush budget scraps 9,790 border patrol agents

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/02/09/MNGOKB837T1.DTL


1,673 posted on 05/15/2006 6:32:23 PM PDT by soccer_maniac (Do some good while browsing FR --> Join our Folding@Home Team# 36120: keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1649 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

I have no problem with it.

I was simply replying to someone who was worried they might get a social security card that actually had some ID authentication as part of it. the government is mining credit card purchases and UPS/FEDEX records to find people who buy cigarettes online to avoid taxes, and we've got people saying an ID card is the "end of the world". if a proper ID card meant that employers would have to square up their employment, or face sanctions - sign me up.


1,674 posted on 05/15/2006 6:32:30 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1638 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
The House passes HR4437 a pretty good bill and you say that the American people are unhappy with the House?

2006 is an mid-term election year so turnout is key. The illegal immigration issue will most likely have a depressing effect on conservative voter turnout and will make all GOP officials vulnerable.

1,675 posted on 05/15/2006 6:32:33 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1650 | View Replies]

To: bfree

I see only one person around here invoking race -- YOU.
You seem to have an unresolved problem with white Europeans. Find a more constructive way to deal with it.

The past cannot be changed; nobody will rise from their grave to apologize to you for their decisions, nor will their descentants make any remuneration on their behalf. It is what it is and it will never be anything else. YOU, however, must decide what to do with your future; you hold it in your hands, and it will become only what you make of it; good or evil. You, alone, will take the glory or the blame. Choose.

My ancestors came in the mid-1800's with the clothes on their backs. When they went to their graves they owned homes and had moeny in the bank. That opportunity still exists for people who are willing to work instead of whine.

We came when there WAS NO "IMMIGRATION" LAW, but what laws there were got enforced. We ask no different now. NOW there ARE IMMIGRATION LAWS, and all we're asking is that they get enforced.

THAT isn't racist; it's a simple appeal to the rule of Law.


1,676 posted on 05/15/2006 6:32:33 PM PDT by HKMk23 (We keep you alive to serve this ship. Row well, and live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies]

To: jammer
Prediction? It was an assessment... and not a complimentary one.

Sure, you put up $10,000; I'll go have a beer. It still won't help your idiotic post make any more sense, but at least it'll be a beer.

1,677 posted on 05/15/2006 6:32:39 PM PDT by Coop (Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1420 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13

"The conservatives lost everything tonight."

Oh yeah, we should follow the socialistic French approach to politics. Right. We have lost nothing. We will prevail, and if we don't on this particular issue, the Pub party in general will have lost everything tonite, not just the conservatives. We will lurk in the weeds, through another Dem administration, until, just like in France, things get so bad that we will be welcomed back with open arms as saviours, this time true conservative saviours, not with the RINO's we are now dealing with, whon are the same as Dems anyhow. So, like a Phoenix, if we lose in the short run, we shall rise from the ashes in the long run. Sometimes things have to get worse before they get better. In France, it seems things just keep getting worse, and there is no better. Socialism will do that to you.


1,678 posted on 05/15/2006 6:32:41 PM PDT by flaglady47 (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1549 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

lol. excellent rant.


1,679 posted on 05/15/2006 6:32:41 PM PDT by Pelham (jobs Americans won't do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1613 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Just heard Bush's speech. Unghh.

Followed by Durbin's comments. Double Unghh.

If this country is not ripe for a third party takeover, I don't know if it ever will be. God help us.

1,680 posted on 05/15/2006 6:33:03 PM PDT by budwiesest (I don't do that much diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1600 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 3,261-3,277 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson