Posted on 05/14/2006 4:56:29 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, May 14th, 2006
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Laura Bush; author Mary Cheney; columnist Art Buchwald.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Former House speaker Newt Gingrich.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): White House national-security adviser Stephen Hadley; Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa.; Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif.
THIS WEEK (ABC): First lady Laura Bush; Sens. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., and Joe Biden, D-Del.; actress Reese Witherspoon.
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Hadley; former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski; Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.; Abdul-Illah al-Khatib, Jordanian foreign minister.
LOL. That's the one. For some reason, my mind refuses to remember his name.
Thanks, I didn't know about that. I sure hope I remember these things for the election in November.....
Juan just told Brit that he's acting like the tough guy (with regard to the NSA)
Hey, why not? I'm just happy that the President took my suggestion to hire Tony! :-)
In lecturing Brit, Juan is getting too big for his britches.
Hooray. I cannot take Catherine Herridge and I just LOVE "the gazelle."
No,Carolinamom. He is the Chief Washington correspondent for over an year now. I like him next to Brit.
I like Jim too. When I visited the WH press room several summers ago, I made it a point to sit in Jim's seat. ;)
Stop confusing the drive-by spin plans with facts, Americans are outraged at GWB all the time, I know I read it in the NYT and hear it on CNN don'tcha just know.
I wish INS had done what it was mandated to do. We would not have the magnitude of today's illegal residents. Just like many bureaucracies, the INS hassled middle-class potential immigrants (people who tried to enter legally) as a means of "feeling good" about doing their jobs. I don't want to take this thread in a immigration debate direction, I just wanted to make a comment about the abject failure ever since Reagan's Amnesty to live up to the enforcement half of the legislation.
LOL. I don't see why not.
I would offer this defense of the NSA database of phone connections.
We have three ways of identifying Al Queda communications:
1) We can, through humint, stumble on one of their phone numbers.
2) We can set up a 1-800-BLO-MEUP hotline for terrorists to call in and volunteer their phone numbers.
3) We can monitor calling patterns between known Al-Queada areas and domestic numbers for connections that appear suspicious.
This also gives the benefit of instantly knowing the connections to a number that humint turns up from a known Al-Queda, being able to get whatever needed warrants, and move on the Al-Queda operatives here.
Agreed. I won't go further either but to say enforcing the law does not seem to be in vogue with some agencies. More conservative judges will help too, IMHO, which is why we must retain the presidency in 2008.
Thanks rodguy, it might be a little harsh, but I feel it needs saying.
That's one of the reasons why I'd like to see it moved over under the Coast Guard. There's an institution that has the "right stuff" to take on the job. The Coast Guard is already part of DHS, so it may even be an internal matter, not requiring legislation.
@@@@@
Wonderful solution! I agree with you about the entrenched bureaucracy, but I hate the hypocrisy on Capitol Hill when senators want to point fingers about how Situation X has not been solved yet. The Federal response to Katrina leaps to mind as an example.
That is very long and detailed. I will have to go back and read it later, but thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.