Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breyer Banters With Law Students
Harvard Crimson ^ | 5/4/6 | Paras D. Bhayani

Posted on 05/04/2006 1:06:38 PM PDT by Crackingham

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer paid a hushed visit to Harvard Law School yesterday, calling Bush v. Gore the “most stressful” case during his 12-year tenure and delivering a short address on the high court’s operations. Breyer’s speech to Climenko Professor of Law Charles J. Ogletree’s criminal law class was kept secret from everyone, including Ogletree’s students, until minutes before it began. After a warm greeting from the first-year students, Breyer, a Law School graduate, delivered a relaxed talk about life as a Supreme Court justice.

When asked to choose the most important case of his tenure, Breyer pointed to Bush v. Gore, the 2000 case that ended the Florida recount, because the court had to effectively decide a presidential election in a short time span. But in terms of social impact, Breyer chose the 2003 University of Michigan affirmative action cases, specifically the ruling upholding Michigan Law School’s admissions policy.

“The way the court works is very future related,” Breyer explained.

Breyer devoted most of his speech to outlining the court’s review process, from the time an attorney files an appeal to when a decision is reached and a written opinion is issued.

Deciding which cases to review is “more mechanical than people think,” Breyer said.

“If you were to go through my stack tomorrow, you’d be surprised at how much agreement there would be in the cases you would pick for the court to hear and the cases I would pick,” Breyer said. He added that because of the specificity of the criteria used by the court, choosing which cases to review is fairly straightforward.

The main criterion used by the court is whether a case would give “the country a uniform interpretation of federal law,” Breyer said. “We are not an error-correcting court.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: breyer; scotus; supremecourt

1 posted on 05/04/2006 1:06:40 PM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

What do you think about this article you just posted?


2 posted on 05/04/2006 1:07:34 PM PDT by Coop (Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
“The way the court works is very future related,” Breyer explained.

"Pay attention to original intent", ClearCase_Guy explained.

3 posted on 05/04/2006 1:17:07 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
How can a guy with the personality of a potato "banter" ?
4 posted on 05/04/2006 1:33:55 PM PDT by llevrok (sui generis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

The headline contains a typo. Instead of "banter" it should have said "butter".


5 posted on 05/04/2006 1:37:23 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
you’d be surprised at how much agreement there would be in the cases you would pick for the court to hear and the cases I would pick

Yeah, most law students actually would have picked the Anna Nicole Smith appeal.
6 posted on 05/04/2006 1:39:02 PM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson