Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Says 'Tragedy' not 'Genocide' for 1915 Events
Published: Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Posted on 04/25/2006 8:07:22 PM PDT by x5452

Bush Says 'Tragedy' not 'Genocide' for 1915 Events

By Cihan News Agency, Washington

Published: Tuesday, April 25, 2006

zaman.com

US President George W. Bush has describe the incidents that took place in 1915 as “a tragedy”, in the message he prepared for the 91st anniversary of the so-called Armenian genocide allegations.

The White House announcement reads that the events were a tragedy for mankind and should never be forgotten. Bush, overlooking the demands of the Armenian Diaspora, did not term the incidents as “genocide.”

The event is a source of pain for all Armenians, the. President acknowledged, and Americans feel deeply for this page in history.

Bush invited all parties to take part in dialogue and determine common understanding, and he praised the parties in both Turkey and Armenia who examine the happenings of 1915 impartially, accurately and sensitively.

The Armenian Diaspora alleges a genocide occurred, Armenians were forced to leave their home in 1915; Turkey, on the contrary, refutes these allegations and advocates the deaths were caused by difficult road and weather conditions during the migration.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: armenia; armeniangenocide; dhimmitude; genocide; howcanibeoffendd2day; iamoffended101; orthodox; parseparseparse; religionofpeace; russia; splittinghairs; victimology101
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 next last
To: Lion in Winter
HUH??? What have Albanians got to do with this issue?? NOTHING!!!

I believe you didn't see my next post over twenty posts before your reply.

101 posted on 04/26/2006 10:45:25 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: x5452

"Bush invited all parties to take part in dialogue and determine common understanding, and he praised the parties in both Turkey and Armenia who examine the happenings of 1915 impartially, accurately and sensitively."

????????????

The Turks murdered the Armenians - killed the men and enslaved the women and forced them to convert to the Moon-God.

What else is there to "examine"?

He must be using the same side of his brain he used to create the Harriet Miers Caper, Dubai Port Deal, and the "guest worker/amnesty" program.

Oh well, we apparently have three more years to view his steady drift to the left on social issues I suppose.
That is, unless his antics loose us Congress in 2006, in which case he'll be impeached and we will have Cheney as President - a significant improvement in my eyes.


102 posted on 04/26/2006 10:45:26 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cccp_hater

"When the Iranian president denies the holocaust happened is it because he wants a Nazi party established in Iran."

Some (include me here) believe he already has a 'Nazi' party in Iran.

"Apparently every genocide has to perfectly model the Holocaust in order for it to be REAL, "genocide"."

No not at all. But confusing ethnic cleansing of peacable people with a war or resistance struggle dilutes the meaning of genocide. You may not think that matters. These days Abu Graib is a Gulag after all.

"Are the same standards held to resistors in the Warsaw ghetto?"

So you can't tell the difference between defensive resistance for survival and conflicts other types of conflicts?


103 posted on 04/26/2006 10:45:58 AM PDT by dervish (Never forget Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
It seems to me that many of those who want to use this commemoration as an occasion to shove it in the face of Turkey's leaders (none of whom had anything to do with it)

They're using it as an occasion to try to finally force Turkey to admit what it did. They've been trying for a very long time. What the current leaders didn't do is of no consequence, only that the country admits past mistakes.

104 posted on 04/26/2006 10:48:00 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Sorry, Scoop, but Genocide has to at least include killing, because that's what the "-cide" means. Some have referred to "cultural genocide," but that term is contemptible. It's like calling a fantasy about consentual sex, "mental rape": It demeans the horror of the actual term.

Neither Raphael Remkin, who coined the term, nor the Government of the United States, a signatory of the Genocide Treaty, would agree you. Accuse them of fantasies and demeaning genocide, not me.

Raphael Lemkin, the inventor of the term genocide

Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.
Raphael Lemkin, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe (Wash., D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1944), p. 79.

The crime of genocide involves a wide range of actions, including not only deprivation of life but also the prevention of life (abortions, sterilizations) and also devices considerably endangering life and health (artificial death in special camps, deliberate separation of families for depopulation purposes and so forth). All these actions are subordinated to the criminal intent to destroy or to cripple permanently a human group. The acts are directed against groups, as such, and individuals are selected for destruction only because they belong to these groups. In view of such a phenomenon the terms previously used to describe an attack upon nationhood were not adequate. Mass murder or extermination wouldn't apply in the case of sterilization because the victims not murdered, rather a people was killed through delayed action by stopping propagation. Moreover mass murder does not convey the specific losses to civilization in the form of the cultural contributions which can be made only by groups of people united through national, racial or cultural characteristics.
Raphael Lemkin, "Genocide as a Crime under International Law"

----------------

Convention on the Punishment and Prevention of the Crime of Genocide (to which the US is a signatory)

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.


105 posted on 04/26/2006 10:50:17 AM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: pravknight
When did you start hating Armenians?

Same time I started hating Turks, which was .... never.

I learned about the mass killings from Peter Balakian, a US colonel (retired) (an expert on Turkey), and source material from different perspectives. I became convinced tht standard Armenian line was as much propoganda as the Turkish line.

106 posted on 04/26/2006 10:59:59 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Happy New Year! Breed like dogs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: x5452

This is little more than Bush kissing some Turkish delight. 1.50 million murdered by the Turks? Nah – moderate Moslems wouldn’t do that.


107 posted on 04/26/2006 11:47:32 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic

As a Christian I would never insult Christ by celebrating Ramadan. What kind of evangelical is Bush anyways? Starting to have my doubts.


108 posted on 04/26/2006 11:54:02 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

The Young Turk's motivation was secular, not religious. This party's motives had more to do with nationalism, plain and simple.

I think Turkish oppression of the Kurds alone should show that religion is a secondary matter for the Turks, considering both are Islamic.

The Young Turks imbibed of the same sort of revolutionary zeal that caused Stalin's crimes 20 years later.


109 posted on 04/26/2006 12:12:44 PM PDT by pravknight (Christos Regnat, Christos Imperat, Christus Vincit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

You mean the Albanians who destroy churches?



110 posted on 04/26/2006 2:25:40 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: dangus

OK, then humans are either rocks or plants.


111 posted on 04/26/2006 4:17:17 PM PDT by Lion in Winter (Violent islam is the same as plain islam. No peace at all.... Just mass mayhem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Missed it.. OLD eyes, very OLD eyes!! LOL!


112 posted on 04/26/2006 4:40:43 PM PDT by Lion in Winter (Violent islam is the same as plain islam. No peace at all.... Just mass mayhem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

Is that in Kosovo??? How terrible!!


113 posted on 04/26/2006 4:41:45 PM PDT by Lion in Winter (Violent islam is the same as plain islam. No peace at all.... Just mass mayhem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib; dangus
In the arena of world diplomacy words are never used without careful consideration of both their meaning and the audience to whom they are directed.

The considered choice of the nearly benign word 'tragedy' which invokes a natural event, an expression of God's will rather than man's, like an earthquake instead of the much more accurate and honest 'genocide' which invokes a concerted act of man's will rather than God's is possibly expedient but certainly cowardly.

Given the choice of two words, tragedy or attack, to describe Sept. 11th would either of you use the former?

114 posted on 04/26/2006 4:54:20 PM PDT by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: x5452
The difference is that Bush does not represent the governmnet that perpetrated the act.
115 posted on 04/26/2006 5:03:29 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Muslim Turks were reaponsible for the Albigensian Crusade?

The Albigensian crusade didn't claim a million victims.

116 posted on 04/26/2006 5:04:39 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
Now what happened almost 100 years ago is GWB`s fault? Who knew?

The evil Bush empire had been using their secret time-machine.

117 posted on 04/26/2006 5:05:36 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lion in Winter

Is that in Kosovo??? How terrible!!
__________________________________________________________


Yes, and if your computer ISP can handle it, watch this video of the torching of a church.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4214974207914289532&q=kosovo


118 posted on 04/26/2006 6:07:01 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

The fact that Bush might capitulate to ANY muslims after promising to remedy the situation with Christian Armenians is sad.

I seriously hopes he takes the oppurtunity to make this right.


119 posted on 04/26/2006 6:19:52 PM PDT by x5452
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: pravknight
The West did nothing during World War I to protect the Christians who were being slaughtered by the Ottomans.

The West did nothing during World War II to protect the Jews who were being slaughtered by the Nazis.

It's all the West's fault.

120 posted on 04/26/2006 6:43:19 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson