Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Discovery Prospects at the Large Hadron Collider
Brookhaven National Laboratory ^ | 23 April 2006 | Staff (press release)

Posted on 04/25/2006 7:21:47 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

Will scientists ever find the elusive Higgs particle, the last of the fundamental particles predicted by the Standard Model of particle physics and postulated to play a major role in how fundamental particles get their masses? Are there undiscovered particles “beyond” those described by the Standard Model? Experiments expected to begin next year at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a new particle accelerator at the European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN), will take up the search and explore other intriguing questions about matter in our universe.

Ketevi Assamagan, a physicist at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Brookhaven National Laboratory, has been helping to build and coordinate analysis tools for ATLAS, one of the LHC’s multipurpose detectors. He will give a talk on LHC preparations and the facility’s prospects for discovery at the April meeting of the American Physical Society in Dallas, Texas on Sunday, April 23 at 9:06 a.m. (Room Pegasus B, Hyatt Regency Hotel). Brookhaven Lab is the headquarters for the 33 U.S. institutions contributing to the ATLAS project. Worldwide, more than 2,000 scientists are collaborating on ATLAS.

“The Standard Model has been quite successful in explaining the known particles, their properties, and the main interactions of matter — but there are problems,” Assamagan says.

For example, the Standard Model assumes there is only one type of Higgs particle. With this restriction, computations aimed at correcting the mass of the Higgs diverge so that physicists cannot get a finite result they could measure. Another problem is the enormous energy gap between the scale of gravity (the Planck scale) and the scale of the electroweak force, which governs the Standard Model.

To resolve these problems, scientists have proposed alternative theories or extensions to the Standard Model. In addition to searching for the Higgs particle, the LHC — a 27-kilometer ring-shaped accelerator capable of colliding protons or heavy ions — will probe these theories by searching for the kinds of particles they predict.

One extension theory is known as the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). “Instead of having only one Higgs particle, you end up with five of them,” Assamagan says. And as in all versions of the theory of Supersymmetry, each of these particles — and each of the other particles of the Standard Model — has a yet-to-be-discovered companion supersymmetric partner. “The existence of supersymmetric particles would protect the Higgs mass against divergent radiative corrections,” Assamagan says.

“Since no one has ever detected a sypersymmetric particle, it would be a very significant finding if we see one or more at the LHC,” he adds. The prospects for such as discovery at the LHC are quite good, he suggests, because the LHC machine will have sufficient energy and collision rates to produce these particles.

The LHC will also explore the idea that “large extra dimensions” exist to bridge the energy gap between the electroweak and Planck scales, as well as other theories that suggest the supposed fundamental particles of the Standard Model are not fundamental at all, but instead are themselves composites — that is, composed of even smaller, more fundamental building blocks yet to be discovered. In addition to exploring these realms “beyond the Standard Model,” LHC experiments will also probe the mysterious missing mass and dark energy of the universe, investigate the reason for nature’s preference for matter over antimatter, and probe matter as it existed at the very beginning of time.

“The ATLAS detector is truly multipurpose, with many different systems for detecting a wide array of particles and reconstructing what happened in the interaction region,” Assamagan says, “so it is not bound to any particular discovery. We hope it is made well enough to discover whatever the case is — even if it is a complete surprise.”

First collisions at the LHC are expected to take place in the summer of 2007.

Brookhaven Lab’s role in this work is funded by the Office of High Energy Physics within the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: higgs; higgsboson; physics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: doc30; PatrickHenry; VadeRetro; Physicist; longshadow

I get the same (let private industry do it) arguments over space exploration.

Also, the cancellation of the SSC was one of the larger US science blunders of the 20th cetury IMHO.

BTW, (Check my signup date) :-) 5 years!! Guess I no longer rate as a newbie! LOL!


21 posted on 04/25/2006 11:46:15 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
We let it get away, but building the Super-collider ("Super-Clyde") would have eaten much of the national science budget for some time. Tough call either way.

Nope. Check the cost of the SSC against the ISS.

22 posted on 04/25/2006 11:48:38 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
That reminds me. I was promised a tour of the new laser facility at Argonne. I gotta call that guy I met last time I was there and set it up.

L

23 posted on 04/25/2006 11:49:57 PM PDT by Lurker (Anyone who doesn't demand an immediate end to illegal immigration is aiding the flesh trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Wish I could join you!


24 posted on 04/25/2006 11:51:47 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
That would be fun. My department rents the conference facilities there from time to time for seminars and classes. Last time I went, I met one of the scientists and he offered a tour if I was really interested.

He gave me a business card and told me to call him. I gotta find it and take him up on the offer.

We occasionally use some of their assets when we have mass casualty drills. They have some really hot decon equipment. Gee, I wonder why....

If you ever get to the western suburbs of Chicago, let me know. I'll see if I can get something set up. Maybe we could set something up at Fermilab as well.

L

25 posted on 04/26/2006 12:01:51 AM PDT by Lurker (Anyone who doesn't demand an immediate end to illegal immigration is aiding the flesh trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; Physicist
I think science is best served by a two-tiered economic system, both with government expenditures and an economic system and climate that encourages massive investment into research by private companies and philanthropies. While it's appaling enough that some people don't want to see any public science funding (their attitude is basically "why pay our most educated people to actually work, when we should just hand it over to those too stupid and lazy to get a job or education?"), but I'm equally disheartened that some people don't recognize there's a role for the private sector as well, or that a free economy is necessary for a healthy research environment, especially since some of these voices come from those within the scientific community frightened by the "corporatization" of research.
26 posted on 04/26/2006 6:26:31 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Creationism is to conservatism what Howard Dean is to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
but I'm equally disheartened that some people don't recognize there's a role for the private sector as well, or that a free economy is necessary for a healthy research environment, especially since some of these voices come from those within the scientific community frightened by the "corporatization" of research.

Ouch. Did I come across that way? If so, it was not intended. I agree that there neeeds to be a blend of both.

27 posted on 04/26/2006 9:19:27 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Thanks! :-)


28 posted on 04/26/2006 9:19:46 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Not at all! I share the same sentiments; I was just try to further build on them, and express the need for a complete openeness in science funding. It is in the best interests of the private sector as well as the public sector to support basic research; the problem is that private funding by itself can't support massive research programs where the trade-off is indirect or not immediate, and that's when the public sector becomes absolutely necessary. Funding of basic research is the best welfare-to-work program we got, IMHO. Just ask Newt :)


29 posted on 04/26/2006 12:31:23 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Creationism is to conservatism what Howard Dean is to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; PatrickHenry
Guess I no longer rate as a newbie! LOL!

But you're still relegated to the Janitorial Staff at DarwinCentral™!

30 posted on 04/26/2006 2:16:14 PM PDT by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: longshadow; RadioAstronomer

I think he was promoted due to some particularly fine debunking action. A mined quote, I think. Anyway, RA has cleaned the dung from his boots. He's still on probation, of course ...


31 posted on 04/26/2006 2:27:35 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; RadioAstronomer
I think he was promoted due to some particularly fine debunking action.

I have no objection .... as long as he doesn't get his own key to the DarwinCentral™ Pleasur-torium, where only the elite Executives of DC are permitted to roam among the service wenches, wearing only a smile and a mink-lined cod-piece.

32 posted on 04/26/2006 2:38:38 PM PDT by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: longshadow; PatrickHenry; Ichneumon
as long as he doesn't get his own key to the DarwinCentral™ Pleasur-torium

Well......Guess I should come clean...(I was spotted in the Pleasur-torium last week anyway SIGH) You see it's this way. Remember when that pad with the letterhead went missing last year? I forged the Grand Masters signature to the lock company for the entire island and had a duplicate set sent to me.

Even the keys to the super secret Perissodactlya Hall! (where we hide all the anti-transition fossils so the ID folks never have any evidence)

33 posted on 04/26/2006 9:03:29 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson