Skip to comments.
RUSH LIMBAUGH LIVE THREAD MON APRIL 24TH 2006
Rush Limbaugh.com ^
Posted on 04/24/2006 7:58:15 AM PDT by MNJohnnie
Mary Mary you are on my mind,
Clinton staffer burned for a crime.
Mary Mary who told you too
leak CIA reports to the news?
Was it Bill or was it Hill?
It's all just a matter of time.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: rushlimbaugh; shadowgov; shadowgovernment; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 501-505 next last
To: mbennett203; Jane Austen
Oh, Limbaugh, you haven't mentioned
this...From reply #2993 on this thread, courtesy Jane Austen:
CIA Fires Officer For Leaking Classified Information to Media
For Immediate Release November 4, 2000
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
Today, I am disapproving H.R. 4392, the "Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001," because of one badly flawed provision that would have made a felony of unauthorized disclosures of classified information. Although well intentioned, that provision is overbroad and may unnecessarily chill legitimate activities that are at the heart of a democracy.
~~~~~SNIP~~~~~~~
Similarly, the legislation may unduly restrain the ability of former Government officials to teach, write, or engage in any activity aimed at building public understanding of complex issues. Incurring such risks is unnecessary and inappropriate in a society built on freedom of expression and the consent of the governed and is particularly inadvisable in a context in which the range of classified materials is so extensive. In such circumstances, this criminal provision would, in my view, create an undue chilling effect.
BTW, note the date.
81
posted on
04/24/2006 9:19:02 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: mewzilla
OK .. here are all the links .. it's big
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1620436/posts?page=197#197
Clinton Ignored CIA Opinion
He pardoned Navy analyst who leaked secret photos to media
Vernon Loeb, Washington Post
Sunday, February 18, 2001
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/02/18/MN46163.DTL
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1620009/posts?page=29#29 To: MNJohnnie; Howlin; kcvl; Mo1
Im wondering if McCarthy wasnt a political appointee (short termer), who then got transformed into a permanent bureaucrat by Clinton, right before he left office?
It sure sounds like she might have been:
Her appointment by Berger:
News from the USIA Washington File
http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1998/06/98061701_tpo.html Article on the Clinton miracle:
Insight on the News: Hey, Orkin Man! - political appointees becoming part of the bureaucracy
http://www.looksmartbonds.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_39_16/ai_66356292 Between October 1998 and June of this year, 57 people appointed to their high positions by the White House, usually because of their ideological affinity with the president, underwent sudden, seemingly miraculous, transformations into professional civil servants, according to a General Accounting Office (GAO) study. Although not unknown during other administration changeovers, the practice of burrowing-in is being watched closely by some on Capitol Hill who worry not only about whether its unfair to career civil servants and violates merit-system protections but whether the lingering presence of such moles might not leave an indelible ideological stamp on the supposedly nonpartisan machinery of government.
29 posted on 04/23/2006 4:52:23 PM EDT by Sam Hill
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1619050/posts?page=2693#2693 To: Mo1; Peach
Clinton Veto Statement (notice the date)
For Immediate Release November 4, 2000
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
Today, I am disapproving H.R. 4392, the "Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001," because of one badly flawed provision that would have made a felony of unauthorized disclosures of classified information. Although well intentioned, that provision is overbroad and may unnecessarily chill legitimate activities that are at the heart of a democracy.
~~~~~SNIP~~~~~~~
Similarly, the legislation may unduly restrain the ability of former Government officials to teach, write, or engage in any activity aimed at building public understanding of complex issues. Incurring such risks is unnecessary and inappropriate in a society built on freedom of expression and the consent of the governed and is particularly inadvisable in a context in which the range of classified materials is so extensive. In such circumstances, this criminal provision would, in my view, create an undue chilling effect.
2,693 posted on 04/24/2006 9:54:14 AM EDT by JaneAustin
82
posted on
04/24/2006 9:19:16 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
To: Mo1
Sorry, I should've specified. I just posted Jane's.
83
posted on
04/24/2006 9:19:52 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: hipaatwo
I hope he goes in depth who Dana Priests hubby is. Me too!
84
posted on
04/24/2006 9:20:11 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
To: Mo1
85
posted on
04/24/2006 9:20:29 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: mewzilla
I am fimiliar with that thread, thanks! IMHO, where there's smoke there's fire and Ms. McCarthy is just the beginning. There are many more former Clintonista's at the CIA and elsewhere in the government. (crossing fingers)
86
posted on
04/24/2006 9:20:58 AM PDT
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(No Amnesty for Law Breaking Illegals!)
To: Mo1
87
posted on
04/24/2006 9:21:14 AM PDT
by
hipaatwo
To: All
88
posted on
04/24/2006 9:21:15 AM PDT
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: Mo1
89
posted on
04/24/2006 9:21:22 AM PDT
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(No Amnesty for Law Breaking Illegals!)
To: restornu
The Beltway crowd is so inbred. It's finally coming to light how incestuous these reporters and their shills in the bureaucracy are.
90
posted on
04/24/2006 9:21:26 AM PDT
by
LibertyLee
(George W. Bush--now more than ever--an admitted Idol and 24 watcher)
To: hipaatwo
He's talking about Dana Priest now
91
posted on
04/24/2006 9:21:31 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
To: alice_in_bubbaland
At least 53 left apparently.
92
posted on
04/24/2006 9:21:45 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Diogenesis
That's quite a remarkable rant on you seeBS eye LOL!
93
posted on
04/24/2006 9:21:48 AM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(If you don't like Jesus, you can go to hell.)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Fox showed Brit with his head in his hands not believing how dense Juan was. Besides his defending leaks of classified info as first amendment rights, he was equally dense on supply and demand. Juan saying crude oil production at record high but have high prices. Brit and Bill tried to explain that demand was even higher meaning the price was going to continue to rise. Juan would have none of it. Stubborn or dense, take your pick.
To: alice_in_bubbaland
I heard ... and I think all my neighbors heard me yell .. YES! when he brought up William Goodfellow .. LOL
95
posted on
04/24/2006 9:22:35 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
To: mewzilla
96
posted on
04/24/2006 9:22:45 AM PDT
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(No Amnesty for Law Breaking Illegals!)
To: hipaatwo
Does sound like he's armed with Freeper research.
I wish Rush would do an appearance on Meet the Press.
Russert wouldn't extend the offer though. Russert would end up peeing in his pants if Rush was a guest.
97
posted on
04/24/2006 9:23:27 AM PDT
by
Republican Red
("How good is it? Al-Jazeera gave it 4 1/2 pipe bombs")
To: Mo1
I'm so glad FR helped him with his show research :) Now if we could only figure out his screename..LOL
98
posted on
04/24/2006 9:23:30 AM PDT
by
hipaatwo
To: mewzilla
BTW, note the date.
First thing I looked at.
99
posted on
04/24/2006 9:23:50 AM PDT
by
Eagle of Liberty
("You can't fix stupid..." - Ron White)
To: MNJohnnie
100
posted on
04/24/2006 9:24:24 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(My Ramblings- http://abaraxas.blogspot.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 501-505 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson