Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crude futures prices tap $75 for first time ever in NY
CBS Marketwatch ^ | 4/21/2006

Posted on 04/21/2006 10:46:54 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Crude-oil futures climbed to a high of $75 per barrel Friday for the first time ever for a front-month contract on concerns about tensions surrounding Iran's nuclear activities, violence in Nigeria, and tight U.S. supplies of unleaded gasoline. June crude was last up $1.26, or 1.7%, at $74.95 per barrel. "We often see this sort of short covering in a record-setting bull market ahead of a weekend, since nobody is sure where we may be Monday," said trader Kevin Kerr, who is also editor of MarketWatch's Global Resources Trader.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crude; economicilliteracy; oil; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-292 next last
To: Siena Dreaming

I just work with what you give me.


181 posted on 04/21/2006 2:28:53 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (Procrastinators of the world UNITE!!!.....Tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

"Just breaking open the seams of coal that underlie many parts of the US, and using the Fischer-Tropsch process, we can produce more fuel stocks than we are likely to import from foreign sources for the next fifty years. In a word, self-sufficiency."

Pennysylvania and Colorado are two states with 3 such plants operational, with more Federal funding coming to open 15-25 new plants by 2010. This will replace a full 30% of Arab oil. Cellulosic ethanol and biodiesel with replace another 30% by 2010.

"Designs for nuclear power generation plants, using technology developed since the last round of plants were built in this country some thirty years ago, should become one of our crash goals, starting a new plant every two weeks for the next five years, and getting them on line within three years of beginning construction."

Well that my friend is a lot easier said then done. Right now we need to look at this as the next Manhatten Project but it won't be, because you have too much lobbying from big oil in Washington. That means the private sector will likely be the ones to build plants, but don't expect this anytime soon.


182 posted on 04/21/2006 2:30:51 PM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jec41

I saw a guy yesterday in the local station complaining to everyone how he cannot afford these gas increases. The whole time in line while moaning he has a twelve pack under each arm at probably $10 per. And from his looks that would last him two days. Uh, stop drinking and apply that too gas. Would be much better off.
Look , I hate having to pay more for gas. My wife and I make around 75k per year. Not rich, but not struggling too mightily either. But once I get past the hysteria, it isn't affecting us all that much. We just cut back on some other little things. We had a normal Friday night ritual of ordering pizza for us and the three kids. Now we do it every two weeks. Saves $60 a month right there. That is probably more than the the difference in our fuel costs monthly.
I feel bad for those who are really struggling. I just question how many are really that strapped, or maybe they just need something to complain about. Smart choices can make a world of difference.


183 posted on 04/21/2006 2:31:44 PM PDT by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

"What the heck do they need to market for?"

Marketing = commercials on how Exxon, BP and others are trying to save our ecology by drilling smarter.


184 posted on 04/21/2006 2:33:49 PM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

If you can telecommute, your job can be outsourced to India for half the salary. Be careful what you wish for.


185 posted on 04/21/2006 2:34:57 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
Telecommuting need not be an everyday thing. More like one day a week.

There are a lot of significant downsides to outsourcing, as many have learned in the last few years.

If companies, which are able to, allowed 25% of their employees to telecommute one day a week, it could have a significant impact on oil consumption and traffic congestion.

186 posted on 04/21/2006 2:38:34 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: jec41

I honestly don't know when it comes to a percentage, but enough to make some profit, not overlow their pockets.


187 posted on 04/21/2006 2:40:07 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (Gov't solution to invasion=band aid. What we need is to fix the leak, before we clean up the mess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

overlow = overFlow


188 posted on 04/21/2006 2:40:23 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (Gov't solution to invasion=band aid. What we need is to fix the leak, before we clean up the mess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
"No, but they give $400 million retirement parachutes. That's the equivalent of giving him the Atlanta Braves franchise ($424 million value) just for retiring. What other "perks" do you think we pay for?"

Then I take it you have read and understand "him" ... (L.R. Raymond's) contract and think because of it, gas prices are skyrocketing?

"Let's face facts. With the government-approved mergers of big oil companies, competition is dead. The oil companies are no different than the federal government. One raises taxes. The other raises prices."

Competition to do what? Pay the market price for a barrel of crude? Competition to build refineries that are cost prohibitive in the U.S.?

Your solution would be?

In the same breath you say that throwing $400 mil down this guy's fat throat is fine but building or upgrading a refinery is too expensive? It just doesn't seem sensible for a company to throw away its money like that.

At least a refinery will result in future company growth and profit. Hopefully Exxon won't be whining for a government bailout when oil tanks and they've pissed away their last billion.

189 posted on 04/21/2006 2:45:13 PM PDT by gore_sux (and so does Xlinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
"If companies, which are able to, allowed 25% of their employees to telecommute one day a week, it could have a significant impact on oil consumption and traffic congestion."

I had a manager who came in and forbade any form of telecommuting, did away with flex-time, and wanted the entire department to work 9 AM - 5:30 PM (now that's good on traffic). That lasted until his boss found out he telecommuted a couple days per week, and came in whenever he pleased.

Telecommuting when possible, and flextime would help a lot.
190 posted on 04/21/2006 2:56:58 PM PDT by Diligent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn
Actually 20-25k a year does me fine and I save quite a bit at that. I never saved nickel when I made over a 100k. Everything I have is paid for and I don't want any debt no matter how good it looks.
191 posted on 04/21/2006 2:57:06 PM PDT by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: jec41

We have no debt, other than a 100,000 balance on our mortgage.
Mutual funds and gold. Where all of our extra cash goes.


192 posted on 04/21/2006 3:00:29 PM PDT by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

We just bought 10 oz of gold at $630 per.


193 posted on 04/21/2006 3:01:40 PM PDT by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

"He said he gets in his car at 5:00am, drives up the road to big Shell/Exxon/Mobil/BP corner of gas stations, and sets his price $0.01 less than the cheapest price."

If his car get 15 miles to the gallon and he fills his tank at his own gas station before he leaves and drives 8 miles one way only to top off the tank at his competetitors gas station before returning and repeats this process every morning, will he profit or gain?


194 posted on 04/21/2006 3:13:02 PM PDT by Boanarges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Soros


195 posted on 04/21/2006 3:13:04 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn
I have rooms full of paintings. I like them and few people know Little about paintings. I once brought a painting out of a yard sale for $40 that was worth $40,000. I did not even know the value at the time. I just knew it had to be good because it had a $500 dollar frame on it and I knew the frame company and their prices.
196 posted on 04/21/2006 3:14:01 PM PDT by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

"all I know is I am sick of paying $3 a gallon for gas..."

Better get used to it.

It's going to get worse.

Europe pays $6.00 a gallon.

I;m not happy about this either.


197 posted on 04/21/2006 3:15:00 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Don't forget the taxes!

I don't think we passed the bill to not tax inheritance, did we? Even if we did they'll be taxed to death while all are living.

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh ... we're a SOCIALIST nation.


198 posted on 04/21/2006 3:16:42 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cage Rattler

"Isn't $3.00 a gallon pretty cheap compared to other countries?"

yes, it's dirt cheap. Europe pays $6.00 and up per gallon.


199 posted on 04/21/2006 3:18:16 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BW2221

"He also needs to have a plan for alternative sources of energy. If Brazil can convert to ethanol, why can't the U.S.?"

We can and we are. Brazil started this in the 80's when dictators ruled the country. The only good thing they did for the country was force mass ethanol refinery build & distribution and subsidized the industry. The government recouped it's investment by forcing the people in the 90's to buy the drastically more expensive ethanol blend. Brazil now produces enough supply for the entire population but at certain times they migrated, brief shortages appeared.

The USA uses 500 times more gasoline then Brazil. To scale up our own ethanol production takes time. Brazil had the perfect crop for cellulosic ethanol from sugar cane. Here in the states, we have ample corn but are still perfecting the blend to not corrode metal pipes so it can be shipped this method instead of truck/train. Shipping truck/train adds a big cost to the product. Then we have to build more ethanol refineries and those pipelines which both take years.


200 posted on 04/21/2006 3:22:29 PM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson