I agree with most of what you say, but you do not seem to have read my post or have adequate rebuttals to what I have written. You are seeing only trees, not the forest. Read through the posts here and you will see what I mean...
I don't think we are really that far apart.
I agree with everything except your characterization of my opinion as a "prejudice" that men are more aggressive than women.
If you read my remarks, that is the ONLY thing I took issue with, I did NOT (and do not) take issue with the rest of your statements in Post #28, I did not say so, but I thought the post was pretty spot on except for statement #1.
I think you took my exception as a blanket disagreement. It was not. My whole post was focused on male agression.
And by the way, I do not think "agression" is a bad thing. Some circles have given it bad overtones, but agressive behavior is what makes men, well...men. It is part of what makes us what we are. As men, we can (and do) channel that agressiveness towards constructive ends. Many feminists negatively characterize all male agression as PHYSICAL agression towards women, and that is only one facet of it, and a fairly small one, in my opinion.
You know what always amuses me? You get sent to a domestic, the woman's nose is swollen up like a tomato and blood running down her face. When you ask her what happened she says her dear hubby bashed her in the mush and she wants him locked up.
You ask Killer why he bashed his woman in the mush and he says "The bitch had it comin'".
So, she signs the domestic violence affidavit and you start cuffing him up.
Next thing you know she's juming on your back hitting you and screaming "don't take him to jail, I love him."
Then you ask the silly question "Well, why did you sign the affidavit?" And she tells you that she just wanted us to scare him.