Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Nears Deal on Illegal Immigrants (breaking on cable networks)
AP/Yahoo News ^ | 4-6-06 | DAVID ESPO

Posted on 04/06/2006 8:33:43 AM PDT by STARWISE

WASHINGTON - In a last stab at compromise, Senate Republicans and Democrats reported progress Thursday toward agreement on legislation opening the way to legal status and eventual citizenship for many of the 11 million immigrants now in the U.S. illegally.

"There's been tremendous progress overnight," said Sen. Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record) of Nevada, the Democratic leader, while Majority Leader Bill Frist also expressed optimism that a long-sought compromise might be at hand.

There was no immediate reaction from President Bush, who has made immigration legislation a key priority.

The developments occurred after Frist unveiled a new bill late Wednesday night on the subject as the Senate headed into a test vote on the most sweeping immigration bill in two decades.

In general, the legislation would provide for enhanced border security, regulate the flow of future immigrants into the United States and settle the legal fate of the estimated 11 million men, women and children already in the country.

It was the fate of the illegal immigrant population that proved hardest to legislate, and it has left the Senate on the verge of gridlock for days.

(snip)

Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., as well as other key senators met before the vote to review terms of a proposed compromise.

In general, it would require illegal immigrants who have been in the United States between two years and five years to return to their home country briefly, then re-enter as temporary workers. They could then begin a process of seeking citizenship.

Illegal immigrants here longer than five years would not be required to return home; those in the country less than two years would be required to leave without assurances of returning, and take their place in line with others seeking entry papers.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; amnesty; borderlist; buchananwasright; compromise; congress; guestworker; idiotsonparade; immigration; senatetraitors; soldout; tancredo4president; theswimmer; traitors; trashingamerica; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,881-1,9001,901-1,9201,921-1,940 ... 1,981-1,982 next last
To: Eastbound

Nope - I'm saying there are better ways to prevent terrorism than doubling or tripling our "security" at borders.


1,901 posted on 04/07/2006 10:14:02 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1900 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
"Limited resources"? ha

Do you know what percentage of the 86-87 Amnesty crowd went on welfare the very first day they could?

And it will take just one terrorist with a WMD getting through and causing havoc and Republican Party is dead.

Dubya is too well known for his open border policy.
1,902 posted on 04/07/2006 10:18:18 AM PDT by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1895 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
" In fact, the 9/11 attackers entered LEGALLY!!!! "

Ahem.

"Of 94 alien terrorists in the United States, she found that 59 were successful immigration frauds. That includes six of the 9/11 hijackers." -- Janice Kephart, former counsel to the 9/11 Commission.

1,903 posted on 04/07/2006 10:20:40 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1899 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
They may have entered legally, but most of them certainly didn't stay here legally. And their ability to skirt the law was in large part due to the fact that our immigration authorities were overburdened by the large numbers of illegals already streaming in. Fencing off the border will help a great deal with that problem.
1,904 posted on 04/07/2006 10:24:31 AM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1899 | View Replies]

To: inquest

How about instead of the fence then, we use all that money to catch any terrorist that overstayed his / her visa?!


1,905 posted on 04/07/2006 10:28:42 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1904 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
The fence is a one-time expense. Visa enforcement is a continuous expense. And as it becomes tougher for terrorists to overstay their visas, they'll begin to abandon legal methods of entry and focus more on illegal methods. That's where the fence comes in.
1,906 posted on 04/07/2006 10:35:42 AM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1905 | View Replies]

To: inquest

I agree that some balance needs to be reached.


1,907 posted on 04/07/2006 10:36:37 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1906 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
"Nope - I'm saying there are better ways to prevent terrorism than doubling or tripling our "security" at borders."

How about offering a quid pro to the terrorists. If they will insure that the U.S. proper will never again be hit by them in any manner, we will allow the ROP and its adherents now in country to remain here so long as they assimilate and stop pushing for their sharia crap and special consideration above and beyond what any other religion in America gets for their religious needs. But no more immigrants from the religion of pieces.

If not, deport 'em all immediately following the next terrorist attack for their own safety. Their call.

1,908 posted on 04/07/2006 10:53:06 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1901 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound

Nope - we never negotiate with terrorists - as for the assimilation part of terrorists already here, I'm open to suggestions.


1,909 posted on 04/07/2006 11:01:35 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1908 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
I don't want any more 9/11 attacks - which is why I am in favor of SPENDING OUR LIMITED RESOURCES WISELY in that regard.

Yet you favor the Senate bill, which I pointed out makes the chance of terrorist attacks greater.

So, once again, I don't think you're being forthcoming here.

1,910 posted on 04/07/2006 11:02:34 AM PDT by dirtboy (Tagline under contruction. Fines doubled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1895 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You are free to think whatever you'd like - I think that terrorists coming over LEGALLY is a much greater threat.


1,911 posted on 04/07/2006 11:12:56 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1910 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

It wasn't a negotiation. It was an ultimatum.


1,912 posted on 04/07/2006 11:24:44 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1909 | View Replies]

To: Peach

My fax:

Senator Murray:
Having moved here (against my better judgment) from San Diego, I can tell you that about half the illegal aliens from Mexico come here to pillage. When you vote for amnesty, you are approving of their criminal acts.


1,913 posted on 04/07/2006 11:30:40 AM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
It's still a nasty sh!thole loaded with cholos and illegals.
1,914 posted on 04/07/2006 11:31:47 AM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1844 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
You say there are dozens on the thread you provided, yet at post 173 out of 178 you said you had a dozen. So, either you are lying or your addition skills suck. So which are you admitting to?
1,915 posted on 04/07/2006 11:36:02 AM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1842 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
Where that balance is struck can be negotiable to a certain extent. But what can not be negotiable is that whatever we decide is the appropriate level of border security, that level of security has to be in place before we can even begin to discuss legalization of illegals.

To do otherwise would just put even more pressure on the border, as the next generation of illegals gets to thinking it can cash in on the next amnesty. '86 all over again.

1,916 posted on 04/07/2006 11:43:12 AM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1907 | View Replies]

To: inquest

I think our country is big enough to walk and chew gum at the same time ; )


1,917 posted on 04/07/2006 11:53:02 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1916 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru

I said there are dozens at Free Republic - one thread woven among many does not the entire tapestry make.


1,918 posted on 04/07/2006 11:53:56 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1915 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

I can understand people that want to end legal immigration. I do not agree with them, but I understand them. You, OTOH, want to give citizenship to every person who comes over the border. I guess the welfare lists aren't big enough for you yet.


1,919 posted on 04/07/2006 12:04:09 PM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1918 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru

That's not what the Senate proposal was - perhaps you need to read it before posting.


1,920 posted on 04/07/2006 12:05:52 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1919 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,881-1,9001,901-1,9201,921-1,940 ... 1,981-1,982 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson