So Iraq's **Air Force** general recruited suicide bombers for missions against the U.S. in 2001.
Gee, what sort of anti-American aircraft terrorism could he have had in mind back in March of 2001?
Saddam Terrorist Regime! A smoking Gun document.
Bush lied, please don't let evidence get in the way of speaking truth to power! We have to talk about Katie Couric moving to CBS, enough with these "facts"!
Thank you for all your work, JV.
*applause*
Great post. Would be nice if the media did a better job of getting info like this out to the people. But then that would take away from the "Iraq war is bad and all for oil" message.
BTTT
Sadaam Regime recruiting suicide terrorists in March 01... 6 months before the suicide terrorists took down the towers... and yet the Democrats will defend Sadaam and say he had not ties to 9/11 or the perps that did it... Give me a break.... It may yet come out that 9/11 was in fact a Bin Laden/Hussein coordinated venture.
You are a great asset to America...
your work will play a great role in history....
Thank you and bless you!
So Iraq's **Air Force** general recruited suicide bombers for missions against the U.S. in 2001.
Gee, what sort of anti-American aircraft terrorism could he have had in mind back in March of 2001?
good job jveritas! keep up the good work! :)
Are you archiving this stuff somewhere other than FR threads I hope!!! When you finally hit the bigtime, I don't want the load killing FR!
Great work again JV.
Peach see this?
I am off to email links on this to the Junk Journalists who get paid to do this and STILL cannot find their butt with both hands and a road map.
This one is strong.
You, sir/madam, are a GREAT AMERICAN!!!!!!!!
I guess this is the "real, but phony" paradigm, as opposed to the Rather paradigm of "fake, but accurate".
And, it is more unfortunate that the administration was the one that open the door for all of this criticism.
The administration should have never let the "16 words" get raised to any level at all. The White House should have never said that "it shouldn't have been in there" (or whatever they said). If the White House said anything, they should have said,
"Yeah, the President said it. So what? The British believe it and they are our allies, so we believe them. If you don't, go talk to Tony Blair. It's the intelligence that is available and the President is required to act. Period. End of Story. If you don't like that, stuff it."Or, at least they could have established that these 16 words were only the smallest of smallest parts of the reasons for going to Iraq. And, while the President cited many other reasons, this is the only thing that he said in the SOTU address that his political opponents have latched on to.
It's noteworthy that they latched onto this phrase. And, it's more curious that a few months later, those were the words that "launched 1,000 lies". The Wilson thing, the "we shouldn't have invade", the "bad intelligence", etc., etc., etc. The entired "Bush lied, people died" mantra is premised almost entirely on these 16 words.
Is it bogus? Yes.
Do alternative media sources (talk radio, the internet, etc) snuff out the left's lies very easily? Yes.
But, that is the smallest of effects. People still are relying on the leftist idiots that give different variations on the "Bush lied" theme every night. But, as long as these folks can watch American Idol or some other mindless claptrap, they really don't care and the just gobble the lies up.
Once again, I'm forced to conclude my post with...
Sad. Just sad.
jveritas,
This is it, the big time paydirt.
Most excellent work you have done.
-unc.
Saddam Hussein was in cahoots with terrorists, period.
I just forwarded a link to this thread to Drudge.
Oh my, Miss Kitty, looky here! I do declare we have ourselves some "Gunsmoke"!
Unbelievable! We must BOMBARD the media outlets with this!
What a find!
jveritas, what a treasure you are! As always! :^)