March 2001 Document: Saddam Regime Recruits Suicide Terrorists to Hit US Interests (Translation

Pentagon/FMSO Iraq Pre-War documents ^ | April 5 2006 | jveritas

[jveritas]

Page 6 from document BIAP 2003-000654 is a Top Secret letter dated March/11/2001 six months prior to 9/11/2001, proves that not only Saddam Regime supported terrorists organization like Hamas and Al Qaeda as we have learned from other documents but also they were recruiting Suicide Terrorist Bombers to hit US interests. Saddam Regime was a TERRORIST REGIME and there was no other way but to destroy it after 9/11.

Beginning of the translation of page 6 from document BIAP 2003-000654

In the Name of God the Merciful The Compassionate

Top Secret

The Command of Ali Bin Abi Taleb Air Force Base

No 3/6/104

Date 11 March 2001

To all the Units

Subject: Volunteer for Suicide Mission

The top secret letter 2205 of the Military Branch of Al Qadisya on 4/3/2001 announced by the top secret letter 246 from the Command of the military sector of Zi Kar on 8/3/2001 announced to us by the top secret letter 154 from the Command of Ali Military Division on 10/3/2001 we ask to provide that Division with the names of those who desire to volunteer for Suicide Mission to liberate Palestine and to strike American Interests and according what is shown below to please review and inform us.

Air Brigadier General

Abdel Magid Hammod Ali

Commander of Ali Bin Abi Taleb Air Force Base

Air Colonel

Mohamad Majid Mahdi.

End of translation of page 6

[jveritas]

Is this a hug? :)

[nutmeg]

Smokin' gun ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

[Calpernia]

I think JV will definitely be up for a freep award!

[Calpernia]

ABSOLUTELY!

[jveritas]

I am honored to be doing this and posting on this greatest of all forum.

Thank you all my freepers.

Thank you Jim Robinson.

[jveritas]

Thanks :)

[jveritas]

You welcome Uncle Sam :)

[Calpernia]

Mark this one for the folder. There are a few links that are still missing. But something tells me it isn't for long.

[jveritas]

SADDAM TERRORIST REGIME.

It was absolutely the right thing to take him out because if Al Qaeda would not have hit us he would have done it and this document proves without any doubt that he was going to do it.

[jveritas]

Nutmeg thank you for pinging the others, we must inform as many people as we can about this smoking gun document.

[Delta 21]

Here ya go. I found the original.

[DCPatriot]

The MSM equates these documents as we did Pres. Bush's National Guard memos.

Fakes. They just won't speak it.

[smoothsailing]

Got it! :)

[justshutupandtakeit]

It is very important for the Treason Media to keep the attention of the public on lesser issues: Cynthia, Illegals, Delay, murder cases ANYTHING but this.

[RayRobisonblog]

So to clarify, does this doc demonstrate recruitment of foreign elements in Iraq, or Iraqis? It is a huge find either way because this alone justifies the war to a reasonable person. It proves that the preemption doctrine was sound policy in this case. The threat was not imagined. It was based on valid indicators that Saddam intended to attack the US through asymmetrical warfare (if he didn't already), which is exactly what the President said he would do.

[bnelson44]

Yes, this one does appear to be giving off vapors.

more please...

[fanfan]

I hate it when clowns like Shays make me go smarmy more than once a day.

You are an American Patriot, fighting for freedom.

Keep up the good fight!

[MNJohnnie]

You may find this thread intresting

[gov_bean_ counter]

Jveritas has done an amazing job getting this info out the the common folk. I do not think though that any of it would come as a surprise to the intelligence community. They probably know this plus some. The question that needs to begin to be asked of the CIA and political know-it-alls with each revelation is...

Is this actionable intel? I have a sad feeling that too many in the intelligence arena would say no. And that is why we had 9/11.

At what point does all this stuff actually mean anything to the "pros"? I don't think we would like the answer.

[Ben Hecks]

Bump!