Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dead Rock (Rock no longer rolls. Do Democrats?)
The American Prowler ^ | 3/16/2006 | R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.

Posted on 03/16/2006 1:42:40 AM PST by nickcarraway

WASHINGTON -- Those gruesome news reports from the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame ceremony the other night remind me of a conclusion I came to a few years back. Rock and Roll is dead. Rest in peace.

Through the years the peace of the grave has crept up on a lot of rockers, usually years before they arrived at the average life expectancy of almost any type of adult human being, including skydivers and inebriated jaywalkers. Given how preachy the average rocker became by the late 1960s, this is ironic. In their warbles they lectured ordinary Americans on what to eat, what to wear, even prayer. They lectured us on the value of the great outdoors and of world peace. An astonishingly high percentage of them then found themselves under arrest for random violence or ingesting substances that were decidedly unhealthy. So Rock and Roll, rest in peace. Besides, Rock and Roll has not come up with a worthwhile song in at least a decade.

Happily the replacement for these left-wing nihilists on radio has been the right-wing talker. Rush Limbaugh -- the master of the genre -- and Mark Levin, the rising oracle of the genre, are total opposites from any warbler ever featured in Rolling Stone magazine and both are probably better singers. I have no doubt that they are popular because America is an increasingly conservative country and because conservative Americans are not welcomed by mainstream media with the exception of Fox. Yet there is another reason. Rock and Roll is dead.

Radio is a medium peculiarly suited for music, but there is apparently not much of an audience left for Rock and Roll. I mean, how many decades can we listen to the Beach Boys, the Beatles, and other rockers from Rock's better days? They get tiresome, and apparently there is just not a large enough audience opening for earlier musical styles, for instance, big band or swing, jazz, or folk music. Country and Western's audience is not replacing Rock and Roll, and classical music's audience seems to be in decline.

Hence we hear more and more Rush wannabes. Some are dreadful, vacuous, only dimly conservative, shouters. But then as I say we have the rising Mark Levin and doubtless there will be others.

The declining audience for music on radio, however, is a secondary reason for the rise of the conservative talker. The primary reason is politics -- and not any kind of politics but rather conservative politics. The wave toward conservatism still seems to be gaining strength even as the wave for liberalism evanesces. I can recall the late 1960s and the 1970s when talk radio was a very different land from what it is today. Most talk radio hosts were decidedly left. A conservative, for instance, the venerable Bob Grant, was rare. But at some point liberal talk show hosts lost the audience, probably about the time liberalism began to lose out wherever the citizenry's vote mattered. That would be in the early 1980s with the rise of Ronald Reagan.

I think Democrats ought to give this a little thought. Almost nowhere can they start up a successful media alternative to Rush and the gang. Not even Al Gore's opulently endowed television network shows promise. The frightful suffering of the left's Air America is well known. Some say Air America staggers because Al Franken is not funny. But it is more than that. There just are not enough votes out there in radioland to elect a left-wing Rush.

Michael Barone recently gave an analysis of this condition that bodes drearily for Democratic politics. He did not use my radio evidence to foretell a bad day at the polls in the year's off year election. He looked at voter trends, vulnerable congressional seats, and other traditional evidence to predict this fall's elections. He was the first columnist to predict the 1994 takeover of Capitol Hill by the Republicans. The Democrats see themselves duplicating that feat this fall. Barone says no. The votes are just not there. Now let him explain the death of Rock and Roll.

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. is the founder and editor in chief of The American Spectator, a contributing editor to the New York Sun, and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute. His most recent book is Madame Hillary: The Dark Road to the White House (Regnery Publishing).


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; geezerrock; marklevin; museum; music; radio; remmetttyrrelljr; rockmusic; rushlimbaugh; tas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: nickcarraway
Rock and Roll has not come up with a worthwhile song in at least a decade.

Incorrect. Get your Napster or iTunes running and see the following:

Supergrass - Pumping on your stereo
The Hives - Walk Idiot Walk
Jet - Are you gonna be my girl
Kings of Leon - Molly's chambers
Pink - Trouble (Yes, Pink did one good rock song, only one)
Republica - Ready to go
Cigar Store Indians - Who dat?
The Vines - Sunshinin
Eve 6 - Inside Out
Chumbawamba - Amnesia
Moonshine Mountain Boys - Better by the beer
Seven Mary Three - Cumbersome
SR-71 - Right now (from a band named after the other spy plane)
Apollo 440 - Stop the rock
Fatboy Slim - Because we can
The Meteors - Freak

Now, the question isn't whether rock and roll is dead, it is why you haven't heard of most the good stuff. The answer is simple. Labels don't promote rock any more. They only promote rap and scantily clad power pop chicks.

Why this is the case I don't know. But I'm sure it has to do with someone's leftist agenda.
41 posted on 03/16/2006 3:53:43 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I haven't listened to any rock music groups that didn't gain stardom in the 70's or earlier. It is crap. Like someone already mentioned MTV was the final nail in the coffin.

RAP...and I wont call it music....is filth a slime and should be purged from society along with its purveyors. Modern country...has been taken over by pretty boys. Remember when C&W stars looked like they came from an inbred gene pool. Now that was when country music was great. I wont even grace this with what I have always thought of disco. I listen to Classic Rock...Oldies rock and roll...blues, both Chicago and Delta. Old country and bluegrass....and I appreciate the big band era of my father....at least the good stuff. the stuff today really bites......
42 posted on 03/16/2006 4:14:39 AM PST by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

--Reagan wasn't a Reaganite. Massive spending, a tax raise in his second term, etc. He was no better than Bush on fiscal issues.

Not to mention the massive money paid out to farmers before the re-election. For what? He was shooting for 50-0?


43 posted on 03/16/2006 4:18:28 AM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Video killed the radio star.


44 posted on 03/16/2006 4:21:46 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Naw, Rock isn't dead. It just moved over to the C & W station. Old C & W fans hate it, and they all say "That ain't country music" But listen to the drums, the guitar riffs, the beat, and then take a look at the stars! Kenny Chesney may wear a cowboy hat, but the rest of his outfit sure ain't Hank Williams!

Keith Urban! Shania Twain! KID ROCK for pete sakes! Cheryl Crow!

The rock station just went so far out that they left the fan base behind. And the fans moved over to C & W.

Oh and one more thing, like rockstars of old -- now it's the C& W artists that marry the pretty girls from Hollywood.


45 posted on 03/16/2006 4:34:17 AM PST by 9999lakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 9999lakes

LOL. You've got a point :) And I've been listening to more country. Though, in general, I still prefer the golden oldies in both genres.


46 posted on 03/16/2006 4:35:38 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
Why this is the case I don't know. But I'm sure it has to do with someone's leftist agenda.
Actually, I've always suspected "grunge" was pushed by leftists as a counterpoint to "party all night" late 80s metal. That generation supported Reagan and was indeed Bush's strongest age group in 2004.

Punk-pop rock is making a pretty big comeback with bands like Sum41, Bowling for Soup, Blink182, Green Day, Click5, Relient K, Maroon Five (as you mentioned), The Killers, etc.

Rock never went away in England, Jet and Oasis are huge there and they get these flash-in-the-pan bands like Kenickie that do one or two CDs and come up with great stuff, then fade away in true rock tradition. Sleeper and Elastica are highly underrated as well.

If you go back a decade you come up with at least two rock songs that belong on any list of the best: Verve's "Bittersweet Symphony" and Our Lady Peace's "Somewhere Out There".

-Eric

47 posted on 03/16/2006 4:48:59 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 9999lakes
I hate rednecky twangy country, but Toby Keith is pretty good at sneaking in some rock songs and Chesney's "Anything But Mine" sounds a lot more like early Springsteen than Hee Haw.

-Eric

48 posted on 03/16/2006 4:52:31 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Screamname
Rock and roll died when MTV first came on the air, August 1st 1981. That`s when sight replaced sound as the most important thing in the music biz. August 1st 1981 is the beginning of something I call the "music holocaust" and it goes on to this day.

Long before MTV, rock thrived on TV with American Bandstand. Rock and Roll was an American invention and institution. The British invasion led by the Beatles changed Rock for the worse. Within a few years Rock lost its musicality and became noise. As vocalists the Beatles suck. They set a new low for pop music. All sorts of Beatle knock offs became the norm. Nowadays, kids don' even realize that pop singers should have an ounce of musicality in a song. Not only is R&R dead, but also so is pop music. This is all a result of the Beatles who came out of a decadent society.

49 posted on 03/16/2006 4:54:03 AM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (From behind enemy lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
Rap really boggles the mind. The whole concept of rap is not only hijacking the original compositions of other musicians, but hijacking their original recordings as well and adding your own stuff. For example this Kanye West, the "rap genius" who claims GW hates all black people.. I was listening to a few of his abominations the other day. On one he hijacks the Ray Charles song and actual record "I got a woman"... On another he hijacks the song "Goldfinger", a song by John Barry and hijacks the original 1964 record in which Shirley Bassey sings. With a few edits, added sound effects and his "rap" added on top, this guy as a result is constantly praised (when he isn`t praising himself) and is making tons of money. And for what? What did he do? Nothing that a 6 year old couldn`t do. It`s the old Andy Warhol type of con job...Take another persons art or photograph, and draw over it. It`s "art" that is entirely based on hype. Left alone without the hype it is utter shiet, it is a doodle on someones desk.


50 posted on 03/16/2006 4:55:21 AM PST by Screamname (OWWW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qq5aTGSR-Pk&search=jessica%20biel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Rock's alive and well. But you won't find it at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.


51 posted on 03/16/2006 5:00:07 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
Punk-pop rock is making a pretty big comeback with bands like Sum41, Bowling for Soup, Blink182, Green Day, Click5, Relient K, Maroon Five (as you mentioned), The Killers, etc.

Dear sweet Jesus don't call that stuff punk rock.

52 posted on 03/16/2006 5:03:02 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea
It's just poor lighting.

Yes, someone left them on - lol!

53 posted on 03/16/2006 5:09:28 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
Modern country...has been taken over by pretty boys.

Modern country isn't country at all, it's recycled soft core southern rock.Lynard Skynard was more country than any of the "new country" I've heard.Where's the new Tammy Waynet?Merl Haggard?,..snif..PPatsy Kline?

54 posted on 03/16/2006 5:18:04 AM PST by edchambers (Neocon foot-soldier of the Haliburton death squad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kb2614
I haven't heard one band that can even approach Geddy Lee, Neal Peart, & Alex Lifeson.

You know, when I saw the title of this posting, I first thought, "what happened at the R&R HoF?" I have to admit, I haven't heard anything about it. It makes me realize just how out of step I am with popular music today.

I also thought about the music DVDs I recently bought... There are 2 King Crimson DVDs, both of which are from the mid to late 80s. Rush's R30, their 30th anniversary tour. And Yes' 35th anniversary tour. High on the list is the Cream reunion concert. It seems that I haven't heard any R&R that I really loved for 20 plus years, certainly not the bands.

Mark

55 posted on 03/16/2006 5:23:44 AM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
"Dear sweet Jesus don't call that stuff punk rock." The influence is there to be sure. It's not "pure punk", but then again neither was the Ramones, or even Rancid.

-Eric

56 posted on 03/16/2006 5:24:47 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Before After disturbing isnt it?
57 posted on 03/16/2006 5:25:14 AM PST by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

That second picture is actually Eddie Van Halen? I thought that was a joke. Wow.


58 posted on 03/16/2006 5:32:27 AM PST by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Maroon Five, while a very decent band, is no rock band. They sound more like very talented back-up musicians for a boy-band.


59 posted on 03/16/2006 5:36:04 AM PST by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob; NYpeanut

Obvious wig. The whole thing, everything you see. Sits on Jagger's head like a cow flop.

When I was young I wondered what those guys were going to do when they grew up and had to get a job. I suppose I have been envious of Peter Pan's lost boys. Schadenfreude.


60 posted on 03/16/2006 5:39:53 AM PST by Iris7 (Dare to be pigheaded! Stubborn! "Tolerance" is not a virtue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson