Posted on 03/12/2006 2:59:23 AM PST by PrinceOfCups
DP World will not manage six ports in the US as initially agreed, but the aborted deal has achieved for Dubai an outstanding triumph by any yardstick.
First, and as Ghassan Tahboub, media manager in the executive office of His Highness Shaikh Mohammad Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President and Prime Minister and Ruler of Dubai, said, it is an invaluable lesson. "It was an exercise you have to live with, win and then learn from. This was America. There are lobbies, politics and interest groups, and Dubai found itself in the middle of a jungle. In the end I have to thank everybody there for this lesson," he said.
Then, Dubai has gained the greatest international publicity possible and people anywhere can now name the emirate that has laid bare an obstinate mindset of racial discrimination and ethnic prejudice that no public relations gloss will ever cover.
It has also shown beyond any doubt that its amazing success story has never been a cheat and that the geographically small emirate could now compete with the most advanced economies of the world.
Cairo in the 1950s and Beirut in the 1960s succeeded to define trends, but it was mainly on political issues. Dubai in the 2000s thanks to its pro-globalisation trends is showing values that promote success and prowesses that indicate leadership and triumph.
Dubai has demonstrated that while it is moving vibrantly ahead with globalisation, other countries that have always championed free trade are now shackled by a xenophobic tsunami and are likely to feed a global backlash against globalisation.
It has shown the world that the US economic anxieties are being senselessly fuelled by nationalist sentiments that seem to be inexorably on the rise.
The port deal debacle has also proven that Dubai possesses a broader mind than the US when it comes to welcoming and promoting investments and that its openness is genuine and not decided by race or creed.
Last week, US Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez told Gulf News in Manama that the decision against DP World was not racially motivated. Either he was not aware of the strong anti-Arab powers within his own country or he did not wish to hurt our feelings.
Either way, the truth is here for everyone to see and contemplate: Dubai is an economic power that is re-writing books and all those who opposed the port deal should think in that direction and should appreciate that it too can cancel deals.
US economists were quick to bandwagon the belief that the flap over the ports acquisition is unlikely to make a consequential dent in foreign investment flows into their country. But Arab analysts predict that this unwarranted hostility will certainly affect Arab investments in the US and will make US assets less attractive to Arab buyers.
Economically, DP World's takeover was never a special case: a state-owned company from the Middle East is buying an American asset already managed by a non-American entity. Suddenly, ethnicity, tainted by hostility and envy, and not a proven success record, became the guidelines to assess the deal.
America has always been comfortable with most multinationals that invested in the United States because they came from Western countries and are unlikely to be subject to such scrutiny. However, the United States is obviously becoming a less welcoming place for investment from Arab countries.
The port deal opponents should appreciate that their public statements might secure them some political benefits, but will most certainly have grave economic consequences.
The government and the local (semi-controlled) press regularly denounce terrorism. Even in Saudi Arabia, the press is filled almost daily with news and editorials denouncing terrorism. BTW, I don't read Arabic, so my input is based upon the English editions.
....The country is run by a monarchy....
So What? why is that a bad thing?
Workers. Only about 20% of the residents of the UAE are citizens.
Do you have an address? The GOI would be glad to know, as they've been negotiating for a presence for several years.
That's good, but from what I've read the governments over there like to play both sides of the fence.
This would be a good opportunity for Dubai to make it clear where they stand. Ads in American papers would be a start. They need to denounce all terrorism, including that of Palestinians.
You,re behind times. 250,000 British and 25,000 American citizens have recently immigrated to the UAE. My own son who has done three tours in the Middle East is thinking about moving there after he returns from Iraq. He has visited Dubai many, many, times and they need electrical engineers.
I have always supported Israel, still do to this moment - and I also supported the Dubai deal. IMO they enhance the same goal...Peace in the Middle East.
Ads in American papers would be a start
_________________________________________________
Why should they have to do that?
When are own media is scared to publish the Mohammad cartoons.
Also have you read the UAE newspaper Gulf News?
I have.
It's a LOT fairer to the George W. Then the NY Times.
There are a handful of subversives on FR, friend. They are maneuvering to try to undercut GOP activism and generate Democrat seat gains. In general, the best defense is do not respond to them and then their pro Democrat threads stop being bumped unless they do it themselves -- which is counterproductive to their intent. Just letting you know. Concentrate your attention on the threads that engender enthusiasm for victory, both in Iraq and in 2006 vulnerable districts.
Nah, kneepads, now that's the market of the future! Blackbird.
Soooo...how much are they paying you? You are the one standing with the chicken little GOP'ers.
Now why don't you quit with the attempts to insult and make your points if you have any?
Arabs, Muslims, and Middle East governments have a public relations problem in America. Go figure.
Speaking of~~~~~Gen Tommy Franks, one of the more honorable men in this country, has even been accused - by FReepers - of taking money for his position on UAE. That is an indication of how sick some of the mentality is here.
I think two trillion dollars in contracts is an exaggeration. The implication that they buy 2 trillion in debt is wrong, as is, to my knowledge, the presence of a presence of the Government of Israel in the UAE. Exaggerations don't help make either case.
Israel talks to UAE
by: Ross Dunn
UAE map
Israel is planning to open an office in the United Arab Emirates for the first time, in the hope of establishing future official diplomatic ties.
The move is part of efforts by Israel to improve its relations with the Arab world following the cabinet's approval of the disengagement plan from some Palestinian areas.
Israeli officials say they are holding talks with representatives of the United Arab Emirates on opening an office in Abu Dhabi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.