Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indian nuclear data on thorium unique, valuable: IAEA-CRP
PTI ^ | Sunday, March 12, 2006 10:24:47 am | PTI

Posted on 03/11/2006 10:01:23 PM PST by CarrotAndStick

MUMBAI: The International Atomic Energy Agency's Co-ordinated Research Project has described the Indian nuclear data on thorium as unique and of high quality and its contribution very valuable for the international nuclear community.

The nuclear data on thorium is much better than the six-decade data on natural uranium U-238 in both light water and pressurised heavy water reactors.

"With these new evaluations done through the CRP on thorium, India has joined select band of criticality safety benchmark," Andrej Trkov, IAEA Scientific Secretary of Coordinated Research Project (CRP), said.

The main Indian contribution is completion of the KAMINI reactor benchmark which has already been accepted for the prestigious Handbook on International Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments, Trkov said and added a benchmark on post-irradiation examination of irradiated thorium fuel is still in preparation and will be completed as part of this activity.

The CRP on "Evaluated Nuclear Data for the Thorium-Uranium Fuel Cycle" was organised by IAEA to produce the library of evaluated neutron cross section data for transactinide nuclei important for the Th-U fuel cycle.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

©Bennett, Coleman and Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; enrichment; fission; fusion; india; iran; me; nuclear; nuclearweapon; nuke; nukes; thorium; uranium; wmd

1 posted on 03/11/2006 10:01:29 PM PST by CarrotAndStick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

India is willing to give up trade secrets?


2 posted on 03/11/2006 10:04:08 PM PST by endthematrix (None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

KAMINI Experimental reactor


KAMINI (Kalpakkam Mini reactor) is a Uranium-233 fueled, low power (30 kW) research reactor designed and built jointly by the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) and Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (IGCAR), Kalpakkam. This reactor functions as a neutron source with a flux of 1012 neutrons/sqcm/second at core centre and facilitates carrying out neutron radiography of radioactive and non-radioactive objects and neutron activation analysis.

The reactor fuel is an alloy of uranium-233 and aluminium in the form of flat plates and assembled in an aluminum, casing to form the fuel subassemblies. The reflector is beryllium oxide encased in zircaloy sheath. Demineralized light water is used as moderator, coolant as well as shield. Cooling of the reactor core is by natural convection. Start up and regulation of the reactor is done by adjusting the positions of two safety control plates made of cadmium, which is sandwiched in aluminum. These plates are provided with gravity drop mechanism for rapid shut down of the reactor.

KAMINI is the only reactor in the world to use the Uranium-233 isotope for fuel.


http://www.dae.gov.in/publ/ar0203/chap3.pdf


3 posted on 03/11/2006 10:05:11 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

India doesn't have a lot of uranium, but does have huge reserves of thorium.

Thorium-232, which isn't fissionable, can be converted with neutron bombardment to U-233, which is fissionable.


4 posted on 03/11/2006 10:25:26 PM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
As long as they have the proper Thelman wire splicing.
5 posted on 03/11/2006 10:27:43 PM PST by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
They may be ahead of the rest of the world who are just now thinking about using Thorium.

Thorium

***************************

Thorium is much more abundant in nature than uranium.


6 posted on 03/11/2006 10:55:06 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
"fissionable" ?

For someone who knows so much about fission, perhaps fissile would be more appropriate ? :)

7 posted on 03/11/2006 11:19:50 PM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Yeah, fissionable.

It's in the dictionary. Is that OK?


8 posted on 03/11/2006 11:53:33 PM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
"fissile" generally means the isotope undergoes fission when it absorbs a slow moving ("thermal") neutron. Example: U-235

"fissionable" means that a high-energy neutron is required to cause fission. Example: U-238

The terms have distinct meanings in nuclear engineering.

By the way, the U-233 criticality benchmark data will certainly be welcome in the industry. There is very little available, and there is a significant amount of spent fuel in the DOE complex based on the U/Th cycle which needs to be disposed of.

9 posted on 03/12/2006 12:52:59 AM PST by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
Yeah, fissionable. It's in the dictionary. Is that OK? "

Nope, its not OK. You clearly didn't know the difference like Royal Wulff does, or you would have said that instead of "its in the dictionary".

10 posted on 03/12/2006 1:06:00 AM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

We need to keep the IAEA out of our Thorium reactors at any cost. This is state secret. I dont know why our government is fooling around with it.


11 posted on 03/12/2006 2:44:46 AM PST by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

You're right, I didn't know the difference, but then I'm not a nuclear engineer.

Thanks for pointing it out - I'm now smarter than I was yesterday.


12 posted on 03/12/2006 9:29:08 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Hey I didn't know the difference either until I read Wulff's post. I thought something either 'fizzes' or it does not, regardless of how hard it's struck. Appreciate Wulff's post for enlightening us.


13 posted on 03/12/2006 9:37:54 AM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1591642/posts


14 posted on 03/13/2006 4:04:42 AM PST by Irreverent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Check out ThoriumPower.com

US project for thorium power development


15 posted on 04/26/2006 12:20:07 AM PDT by BlackJack (Apres Moi...Le Deluge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlackJack

Thanks for the link!


16 posted on 04/26/2006 12:40:56 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson