Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Today In History: March 6, 1836 - The Fall of The Alamo
http://www.thealamo.org/history.html ^ | 3/06/06

Posted on 03/06/2006 8:54:11 AM PST by MplsSteve

Admin Moderator: I wasn't sure whether to place this in News/Activism or Chat. Pleas feel free to move it where you see fit.

Today is the 170th anniversary of the fall of the Alamo, an epic battle that almost everyone has heard of.

Though I'm not a Texan, I'm reminded of their sacrifice every year. Today, take a moment and think how the defenders of the Alamo stood up to foreign tyranny and said "Enough!"

Click on the source URL for great information regarding the battle and events being held in San Antonio regarding the anniversary/commemoration.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: alamo; americanhistory; battle; remember; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: MplsSteve

My cousin Isaac Ryan died there, on the north wall, near the cannon. His name is on a plaque there. I am supposed to be scanning and mailing all of his papers to the Alamo. I keep forgetting. I have his parents' marriage license and his baptism certif.


21 posted on 03/06/2006 10:28:42 AM PST by buffyt (America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people. Pres. George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shezza

My cousin....

RYAN, ISAAC (1805-1836). Isaac Ryan, Alamo defender, son of Jacob and Marie (Hartgrove) Ryan, was born at St. Landry Parish, Louisiana, on March 1, 1805. He took part in the siege of Bexar and served in the Alamo garrison as a member of Capt. Robert White's infantry company, the Bexar Guards. Ryan died in the battle of the Alamo on March 6, 1836.

http://www.the-alamo-san-antonio.com/html/alamo-heroes.htm


22 posted on 03/06/2006 10:37:11 AM PST by buffyt (America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people. Pres. George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

"There I was, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Davy Crockett and Jim Bowie, staring down Santa Anna, outnumbered a hundred-to-one!"

23 posted on 03/06/2006 10:51:55 AM PST by Jonah Hex ("How'd you get that scar, mister?" "Nicked myself shaving.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shezza

Thanks! We'll never forget!


24 posted on 03/06/2006 11:04:06 AM PST by N8VTXNinWV (Proud Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Should name them all: heroes every one.

From Abamillo, Juan, of Texas, to Zanco, Charles, of DENMARK!

http://www.thealamo.org/defend.html


25 posted on 03/06/2006 12:05:51 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Well, it was 4 PM, so the Mexicans would've been "napping" whether they were tired or not. That's siesta. Santa Anna was otherwise occupied, I'm sure you've heard.

Miss Emily West, liege to Col. James Morgan (so, sometimes identified as Emily Morgan) of Morgan's Point, was entertaining el jefe en flagranto y con opium, which helped hasten his surrender.

Miss Emily, who was of mixed blood, is known to many as The Yellow Rose of Texas, and was the sweetest little rosebud that Texas ever grew (though she was from New Haven, CT, possibly Jamaica before that). A heroic Texian.


26 posted on 03/06/2006 12:06:36 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: john316

"Many thanks to those brave souls from Tennessee!"


. . . and Vermont, North Carolina, Kentucky, Arkansas, Missouri, Scotland, Virginia, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Alabama, Ireland, New Jersey, Germany, Massachusetts, New York, Louisiana, Ohio, Connecticut, Wales, Illinois, Rhode Island, Georgia, Mississippi, Maryland, and Denmark -- not necessarily in that order.

Those were the homes of the heroes of the Alamo, God bless them all.


27 posted on 03/06/2006 12:43:17 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

BTTT


28 posted on 03/06/2006 1:25:58 PM PST by uglybiker (Don't blame me. I didn't make you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

All "G.T.T."


29 posted on 03/06/2006 6:34:20 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bayourant

The background of the Austin Colony was that Mexico--and Spain befoe them-- was not strong enough to hold Texas against the Indians, particularly the Comanche. The Anglos were invited to establish what amounted to a buffer state. They were famous as "indian fighters." The Comanches were known as the Lords of the South Plains, and the deserved the title. For a small "tribe" they were immensely effective, controlling the huge area between the Arkansas River and the Gulf. More like their range, since they were relatively few in number. Best horsemen in the world. They looked like Mongols and rode like them, even better horsemen that the Mexicans--which is saying a lot. Anyway, the Mexicans brought in the Anglos and found they were unruly.
Santa Anna realized they had to be tamed--they along the the Tejanos, the Mexicans in the region who did not like his dictatorship. So be made up a strike force and crossed over in Texas in the dead of winter--no small feat.
And reached San Antonio faster than the Texians could react. Houston wanted the garrison in San Antonio to abandon their "fort" and pull back to join him. Didn't happen, in part because Crockett showed up with a small force.


30 posted on 03/06/2006 6:54:33 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bayourant
"Just curious to what Texans think about the issue. I myself see a more valid reason for this as Manifold Destiny and as a natural consequence of what nations did at the time."

I don't know how serious you are about this:
"Manifold Destiny and as a natural consequence of what nations did at the time.." is not all that clear.

But "manifold destiny" could not apply beyond as a reference to the nature of the individuals involved...not some American plot to take land from a peaceful neighbor.
The majority of those defending the Alamo and fighting on afterward (to victory) were more pioneers and individualists than anything else. There were a goodly number of mexican born pioneers in that mix!

The 'war' started when the M - oops - mexican government reneged on promises, dropped the constitution and rules under which the Texacans/Texans had settled...
The original fight was over having the ground rules changed under them.
In that regard, not much different from another 'revolution' 25 or so years later, even though it was in another country.

"Manifest destiny" and "slavery" just make it more palatable in today's polite society.

31 posted on 03/06/2006 7:09:51 PM PST by norton (did you know that 'Texacans' comes out as 'taxi cabs' in spell check?)...(Texicans?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: norton
"Manifold destiny" versus "Manifest destiny"

Oddly enough,
on re-reading,
I got it right.

(whoopie)

32 posted on 03/06/2006 7:13:43 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

All "G.T.T."

Yep. And never left, clearing paths for the rest of us.


33 posted on 03/06/2006 7:19:15 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

My great Uncle was stationed on the USS Texas and I have an early Panorama photo of the ship and crew.


34 posted on 03/06/2006 7:22:27 PM PST by tertiary01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

And if Fannin hadn't been so scared of his own shadow and if he'd actually sent the requested reinforcements, the Alamo might have held and Santa Anna might have been defeated then and there. With no supplies (he was foraging off the land and had no supply lines), he would have been presented with a quandry. Either surround the fort with a token force and bypass them (thus losing much 'face' and becoming a laughingstock in his mind) or sit there and wait until he'd scavenged the country bare and risk an assault by a prepared and entrenched enemy.

Urrea's forces were another matter - but in the end Fannin turned out to be a completely useless commander; he frittered away his life and the lives of the troops in his care, so it wouldn't have mattered anyway.


35 posted on 03/06/2006 9:18:56 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bayourant

And over and above all, there's no real reason why anyone should have to wonder what tyranny the Texians were subject to. They laid it all out in the Texas Declaration Of Independence, which still rings down the century plus since it was first set to paper.

I posted it here earlier: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1588615/posts


36 posted on 03/06/2006 9:23:19 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Amen, done, and done - from the website you linked:

Defender's Name

Birthplace

Abamillo, Juan TX
Allen, Robert VA
Andross, Miles DeForrest VT
Autry, Micajah NC
Badillo, Juan A. TX
Bailey, Peter James III KY
Baker, Isaac G. AR
Baker, William Charles M. MO
Ballentine, John J. PA
Ballantine, Richard W. Scotland
Baugh, John J. VA
Bayliss, Joseph TN
Blair, John TN
Blair, Samuel TN
Blazeby, William England
Bonham, James Butler SC
Bourne, Daniel England
Bowie, James KY
Bowman, Jesse B. TN
Brown, George England
Brown, James PA
Brown, Robert unknown
Buchanan, James AL
Burns, Samuel E. Ireland
Butler, George, D. MO
Cain, John PA
Campbell, Robert TN
Carey, William R. VA
Clark, Charles Henry MO
Clark, M.B. MS
Cloud, Daniel William KY
Cochran, Robert E. NH
Cottle, George Washington MO
Courtman, Henry Germany
Crawford, Lemuel SC
Crockett, David TN
Crossman, Robert PA
Cummings, David P. PA
Cunningham, Robert NY
Darst, Jacob C. KY
Davis, John KY
Day, Freeman H.K. unknown
Day, Jerry C. MO
Daymon, Squire TN
Dearduff, William TN
Dennison, Stephen England or Ireland
Despallier, Charles LA
Dewall, Lewis NY
Dickinson, Almeron TN
Dillard, John Henry TN
Dimpkins, James R. England
Duvalt, Andrew Ireland
Espalier, Carlos TX
Esparza, Gregorio TX
Evans, Robert Ireland
Evans, Samuel B. NY
Ewing, James L. TN
Faunterloy, William Keener KY
Fishbaugh, William unknown
Flanders, John MA
Floyd, Dolphin Ward NC
Forsyth, John Hubbard NY
Fuentes, Antonio TX
Fuqua, Galba AL
Garnett, William VA
Garrand, James W. LA
Garrett, James Girard TN
Garvin, John E. unknown
Gaston, John E. KY
George, James unknown
Goodrich, John C. VA
Grimes, Albert Calvin GA
Guerrero, José María TX
Gwynne, James C. England
Hannum, James PA
Harris, John KY
Harrison, Andrew Jackson TN
Harrison, William B OH
Hawkins, Joseph M. Ireland
Hays, John M. TN
Heiskell, Charles M. TN
Herndon, Patrick Henry VA
Hersee, William Daniel England
Holland, Tapley OH
Holloway, Samuel PA
Howell, William D. MA
Jackson, Thomas Ireland
Jackson, William Daniel KY
Jameson, Green B. KY
Jennings, Gordon C. CT
Jimenes (Ximenes), Damacio TX
Johnson, Lewis Wales
Johnson, William PA
Jones, John NY
Kellog, John Benjamin KY
Kenney, James VA
Kent, Andrew KY
Kerr, Joseph LA
Kimbell, George C. PA
King, William Philip TX
Lewis, William Irvine VA
Lightfoot, William J. VA
Lindley, Jonathan L. IL
Linn, William MA
Losoya, Toribio TX
Main, George Washington
Malone, William T. GA
Marshall, William TN
Martin, Albert RI
McCafferty, Edward unknown
McCoy, Jesse TN
McDowell, William PA
McGee, James Ireland
McGregor, John Scotland
McKinney, Robert TN
Melton, Eliel GA
Miller, Thomas R. TN
Mills, William TN
Millsaps, Isaac MS
Mitchell, Edwin T. unknown
Mitchell, Napoleon B. unknown
Mitchusson, Edward F. VA
Moore, Robert B. VA
Moore, Willis A. MS
Musselman, Robert OH
Nava, Andrés TX
Neggan, George SC
Nelson, Andrew M. TN
Nelson, Edward SC
Nelson, George SC
Northcross, James VA
Nowlan, James England
Pagan, George unknown
Parker, Christopher Adam unknown
Parks, William NC
Perry, Richardson TX
Pollard, Amos MA
Reynolds, John Purdy PA
Roberts, Thomas H. unknown
Robertson, James Waters TN
Robinson, Isaac Scotland
Rose, James M. OH
Rusk, Jackson J. Ireland
Rutherford, Joseph KY
Ryan, Isaac LA
Scurlock, Mial NC
Sewell, Marcus L. England
Shied, Manson GA
Simmons, Cleveland Kinlock SC
Smith, Andrew H.
Smith, Charles S. MD
Smith, Joshua G. NC
Smith, William H. unknown
Starr, Richard England
Stewart, James E. England
Stockton, Richard L. NJ
Summerlin, A. Spain TN
Summers, William E. TN
Sutherland, William DePriest unknown
Taylor, Edward TN
Taylor, George TN
Taylor, James TN
Taylor, William TN
Thomas, B. Archer M. KY
Thomas, Henry Germany
Thompson, Jesse G. AR
Thomson, John W. NC
Thruston, John, M. PA
Trammel, Burke Ireland
Travis, William Barret SC
Tumlinson, George W. MO
Tylee, James NY
Walker, Asa TN
Walker, Jacob TN
Ward, William B. Ireland
Warnell, Henry unknown
Washington, Joseph G. KY
Waters, Thomas England
Wells, William GA
White, Isaac AL or KY
White, Robert unknown
Williamson, Hiram James PA
Wills, William unknown
Wilson, David L. Scotland
Wilson, John PA
Wolf, Anthony unknown
Wright, Claiborne NC
Zanco, Charles Denmark
___?___, John a Black Freedman

37 posted on 03/06/2006 9:28:50 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bayourant
Manifold Destiny should be Manifest Destiny.

Manifold denotes the exhaust system on your car, while Manifest is clearly evident.

38 posted on 03/06/2006 9:29:09 PM PST by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

I would especially direct your attention to John McGregor.

http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/MM/fmccl.html


39 posted on 03/06/2006 9:36:26 PM PST by decal (Whoever said you can't fool all the people all the time has never visited DU...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
I don't know, but I think that Santa Anna brought up his force very quickly, and the Texians didn't have enough men to man the walls. Got to give him credit for generalship and his men for their bravery. His mistake was fchasing the Texians too far. The closer he got to the Lousiana border, the closer he got to the American forces there, and remember: Andrew Jackson was president and he didn't respect Spanish boundaries. Never can prove it, but Houston was probably Jackson's agent provocateur
40 posted on 03/06/2006 9:42:27 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson