Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/02/2006 8:15:59 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: aculeus

methanol is part of the "hydrogen economy" though.


2 posted on 03/02/2006 8:19:04 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

I think we'll see a mixture of a lot of things fueling America in the future. Very diverse in the beginning but finally settling on two or three different things.


3 posted on 03/02/2006 8:22:30 AM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

check this out....
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/05/EPSCoR/pdf/wed_am/Tennant.final050610%20EPSCoR.pdf

Eastman built plants in the early 80's to produce syn gas from coal. Methnanol is just a short step away. They have two big plants operating all the time and a third government research plant that might not be still operational. They built the plants so they could eliminate natural gas as feed stock


4 posted on 03/02/2006 8:25:18 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Methanol destroys rubber hoses and corrodes metal. It causes reduced fuel mileage and has much less BTUs per gallon. It would cost a fortune to retrofit older vehicles and I doubt it would work in a modern vehicle! The city of Denver tried a tanker of it and within a couple of hours none of the police cars were running.
5 posted on 03/02/2006 8:27:31 AM PST by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

This article doesn't address the main problem with methanol. In order to produce large quantities of methanol it is necessary to rely on those evil companies who drill wells to produce natural gas. Or we could get those other evil companies who kill trees to double their efforts. No, methanol is evil because of the way it would be produced the same as any petroleum based product.


6 posted on 03/02/2006 8:28:30 AM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

So instead of volatile hydrogen, you wind up with poisonous methanol, which soaks through the skin and can cause kidney and nervous system damage, including blindess.


7 posted on 03/02/2006 8:30:04 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

"We were co-inventors of the direct methanol fuel cell."

(... and the co-patent holders primed and ready to score massively if we can talk people into using this ! )


8 posted on 03/02/2006 8:30:58 AM PST by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

bump


9 posted on 03/02/2006 8:33:31 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

I think the methanol/ethanol solution is a dead end.


13 posted on 03/02/2006 8:36:07 AM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
you can take carbon dioxide and water, and if you have electric power, you can chemically reduce it into methanol.

Hmmm, I just bet that the process takes a LOT of energy. Ok boys, fire up those nuke plants.

15 posted on 03/02/2006 8:38:50 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Ethanol is C2H5OH. Methane is CH4. Ethanol is basically two methane molecules sharing a hydrogen bond, with one of the carbons holding a hydroxyl radical instead of a hydrogen.

An alcohol is formed by hydroxylating an alkane, which is exactly what ethanol is -- hydroxylated ethane. Remove the -OH radical and it is a simple hydrocarbon, methane's older brother. I'm not sure how you'd go about adding the hydrogen to the ethane molecule, but doing so would render one ethane into two methanes, and it would all still originate with ethanol.

16 posted on 03/02/2006 8:43:45 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Im trying to escape the rising price of NG, not use more. This is no better than using NG to generate electricity. It's not renewable.
19 posted on 03/02/2006 8:48:39 AM PST by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

The basic problem with hydrogen fuel cells is that it takes
as much energy to produce the hydrogen as is utilized from the hydrogen. Therefore a hydrogen fuel cell is an merely
an energy carrier.


29 posted on 03/02/2006 9:08:09 AM PST by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

What's the energy cost of making methanol? That will determine if it can become competitive with gasoline/diesel.


32 posted on 03/02/2006 9:21:37 AM PST by nuke rocketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

Adding methanol to auto fuel would cut down on people stealing fuel by siphoning.


35 posted on 03/02/2006 9:23:41 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
You see natural gas getting in short supply

For those who think about Peak Oil, which peak may come in the next decade, there is also a Peak Natural Gas, which peak may come in the decade following Peak Oil. There is also Peak Coal, which may come a couple decades following Peak Natural Gas. Natural gas is at present very far from getting in short supply.

38 posted on 03/02/2006 9:58:30 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

The strange thing here is does it HAVE to be METHANOL????
How bout pure, water clear ETHANOL AKA White Lightnin', etc,
works great.......just eliminate the steenking tax....
I am sure the problems with the fuel line material and the gasketing can be worked out rather easy.......

We have the infrastructure to begin production immediately...
both big industry and independent production facilities could be in operation overnight...
problem solved..
Keep the faith for freedom and watch for them Revenooers..

Greg......


41 posted on 03/02/2006 10:12:17 AM PST by gwmoore (As the manual for the Russian Nagant Reolver states" Target Practice' At the Deserter , FIRE".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
And, indeed, you can take carbon dioxide and water, and if you have electric power, you can chemically reduce it into methanol.

Regular...

or Premium?

42 posted on 03/02/2006 10:47:01 AM PST by Semi Civil Servant (The Main Stream Media: Al-Qaeda's most effective spy network.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson