Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frist Proposes Face-saving Dubai Deal
Time Magazine online ^ | Feb. 25, 2006 | Timothy Burger, Mike Allen & Matthew Cooper

Posted on 02/26/2006 8:25:29 AM PST by jraven

Moving toward a deal that could allow President Bush and congressional GOP leaders to save face and avert a prolonged confrontation, GOP officials said today that they were discussing the idea of having Dubai Ports World seek a new review of its acquisition of a British company's operation that runs several key U.S. ports.

House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King, confirmed in a phone interview early Saturday afternoon to TIME that officials were close to a deal involving the Congressional leadership, the White House and the Dubai company. The agreement would call for a 45-day “CFIUS-plus investigation,” King said, referring to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, a Treasury Department-run interagency panel that probes proposed acquisitions in the U.S.

Although the Dubai deal had already been approved by CFIUS, "the rationale for reopening it is, once DP carved out the American ports from the rest of the contract it changed the nature of the agreement so it had to be reviewed again," says King, who had been among the leading GOP voices opposing the deal as first approved without the extra 45-day review process or briefing of Congress. King says will await final details before formally backing any such deal. King added "if we are going to hold back on legislation, I think there has to be continuous congressional review throughout the new CFIUS review.”

If approved by all parties, the new deal would allow Bush to avert a GOP-driven bill to overturn the Dubai deal with enough votes to override Bush's threat of his first veto. Republican sources tell TIME that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee proposed the basic terms of a deal designed to give the White House a graceful way out, while also allaying the concerns of the many lawmakers in both parties who have said the deal could be a threat to our security. Under the Frist plan, the deal could stand a good chance of ultimately going through after the extended review. Frist aides apparently proposed the terms to representatives of the company and the White House late Friday. Neither has formally responded but both seemed interested in the idea, according to a Senate Republican aide. "This avoids a direct clash," the aide said. "It solves everyone's problem. The President doesn't have to cancel the deal or veto anything."

Under Frist's plan, the company would voluntarily separate U.S. ports from the rest of the deal for 45 days, allowing them to continue to operate as they do while the deal is re-vetted. That would allow a new review through the administration's Committee on Foreign Investments in the U.S. (CFIUS). Administration officials remain adamant that their first review was thorough and proper, so the face-saving element was crucial, according to one Capitol Hill negotiator. Frist is proposing that this time, CFIUS do the extra 45-day review that the law calls for in transactions where there are national security concerns. That provision was not triggered last time because administration officials had no remaining concerns at the end of the first review. This approach would eliminate the need for new legislation now, the Republican sources said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; arabs; business; dubai; frist; isolationism; kneejerkflipflop; liberalpropaganda; ports; protectionism; rinos; security; terrorism; uae; waronterror; xenophobicsenators
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-207 last
To: Marine Inspector

Whoopee.


201 posted on 02/26/2006 5:52:57 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

Sounds like you belong here.


202 posted on 02/26/2006 5:55:53 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Don't waste my time in the future, you clown.
Gee, wasn't the last cry that "17 of the 19 hijackers came from SA"?

So, why we didn't blockade Saudi Arabia commencing 9/12?

And, more poignantly, did you call for a blockade of SA back then?

203 posted on 02/26/2006 6:53:06 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Don't waste my time in the future, you clown.
So, we established that funds were transferred through the UAE banks, but that doesn't answer what the source of those finds were ...

Generally, banks disburse funds held in trust, funds deposited with the intent of later withdrawl or transfer.

Got anything following that money further up the stream (the specific 'depositor') for instance?

204 posted on 02/26/2006 6:59:33 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Personal attacks?

The government of UAE had no connection with the 9/11 attackers, you failed to provide proof to your assertion.

You get to wear the big shoes and the red nose, not me.


205 posted on 02/26/2006 9:30:23 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
"This investigation initially identified the Al Qa'ida funding sources of the 19 hijackers in the UAE and Germany."

BAN BRATWURST!!!!!!

NO MORE VOLKSWAGENS!!!

BAN THE BEETLE!!!!

"There is clear evidence that he moved several thousand dollars from a Standard Chartered Bank account in the UAE to Florida’s SunTrust account.

BAN FLORIDA!

NO MORE ORANGES!

DOWN WITH THE DOLPHINS!

(i'm screwed).

206 posted on 02/26/2006 9:37:40 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

Comment #207 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-207 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson