Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The dean of NY Times science writers comes out of his cave on this issue.
1 posted on 02/26/2006 3:25:03 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: blam; Coyoteman; AntiGuv; Torie

Ping...


2 posted on 02/26/2006 3:25:48 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
The question of what Neanderthals and Homo sapiens might have done on cold nights in their caves, if they happened to get together and the fire burned down to embers, has intrigued scientists since the 19th century, when the existence of Neanderthals was discovered.
My theory is that they listened to Dick Clark.
3 posted on 02/26/2006 3:26:46 AM PST by Renderofveils (Qur’an 8:39 “So, fight them until all opposition ends and the only religion is Islam.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

They need to look at Hillary and see if maybe some inbreding took place there. If there are any Neanderthals out there reading this, sorry about the first sentence of this.


4 posted on 02/26/2006 3:30:25 AM PST by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
My reading of history indicates that whenever two groups of people occupy the same land they invariably do two things, fight and f***. It would seem to me to be very unlikely that CroMagnons and Neanderthals were any different in that regard and 3000 years would be plenty of time for it. Just think of it in modern terms. 3000 years would put us back to the time of the pharoahs. Think of all the Viking, Mongol and Moorish genes that got spread around widely in much shorter time periods.

If there are no Neanderthals in our gene pool then it's because they couldn't interbreed, not because they didn't try.

7 posted on 02/26/2006 3:45:32 AM PST by elmer fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
A Good Neanderthal Was Hard to Find

No, it's not. Here's one:


8 posted on 02/26/2006 3:53:30 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
The whole debate about Neanderthals is specious and changes more than bad socks.

At first, the theory was Neanderthals never existed with Homo Sapiens, they were very short, with a small brain, and a complete skeleton was never found or assembled. Anthropologists claimed to have 500 specimens of Neanderthal remains, but later admitted most of those were of children.

When they finally did assemble a skeleton using "fill in" parts, it looked nothing like their earlier theories! Neanderthal was taller than homo sapiens, and with a larger brain!

Umm...OK.

And the theory changes, and changes, and changes.

Perhaps (just perhaps) there isn't any such thing as a separate race in this category at all.

But then, a lot of people will have to admit they were flat out wrong.

I guess it is easier to just keep "updating" the theory.

11 posted on 02/26/2006 4:01:33 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

"SHEEZA...BRICK...HOUSE!..."


12 posted on 02/26/2006 4:02:52 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

14 posted on 02/26/2006 4:07:33 AM PST by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
Dr. Harvati said, "a restricted coexistence interval may be easier to reconcile with the observed lack of Neanderthal genetic contribution to the modern human gene pool

Well you could have fooled me....
23 posted on 02/26/2006 5:01:20 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
Wait a minute Neanderthal is not human???? Modern man did not come from Neanderthal??? This should be on every headline news and updates at the top and bottom of each and every hour.

Science/biology books need recalled for unsupported claims.
29 posted on 02/26/2006 5:12:36 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

Color me confused. IIRC, when I was in school Neanderthals were considered a sub-species, not a separate species, which meant interbreeding was possible and likely. Even if a time split between the two groups made interbreeding unlikely (which one of my old profs argued would have made the Nees a separate species), what physiological difference/s could there have been in the Nees that would have made a union between members of the two groups sterile? I thought the Nees were considered a sub-species?


30 posted on 02/26/2006 5:14:32 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

It is human nature to jump into theories well before the dust of evidences settles, and that nature goes back to when the first blade of grass popped forth.


37 posted on 02/26/2006 5:37:01 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

It is my understanding both species lived in close proximity simulataneously for 11,000 years in caves discovered in Israel.


44 posted on 02/26/2006 5:48:49 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

What we need is a time machine so we can go back and collect the information on the theories we keep coming up with.


62 posted on 02/26/2006 6:38:41 AM PST by Dustbunny (The Islam of the terrorists is not a religion it is a CULT whose leader is Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eaker
observed lack of Neanderthal genetic contribution to the modern human gene pool

I better get out there and do my part!

67 posted on 02/26/2006 6:45:41 AM PST by humblegunner (If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

This article of course raises the other question, was a hard Neandertal good to find? >:0>


136 posted on 02/26/2006 11:52:32 AM PST by Phil Connors
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; StayAt HomeMother; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; asp1; ...
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

155 posted on 02/26/2006 7:04:04 PM PST by SunkenCiv (My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patton

neanderthal ping


160 posted on 02/26/2006 7:30:24 PM PST by zakbrow (I'm running out of places to bury the bodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

the main reason I love Neandertal topics?
The Neandertal Enigma
by James Shreeve
Frayer's own reading of the record reveals a number of overlooked traits that clearly and specifically link the Neandertals to the Cro-Magnons. One such trait is the shape of the opening of the nerve canal in the lower jaw, a spot where dentists often give a pain-blocking injection. In many Neandertal, the upper portion of the opening is covered by a broad bony ridge, a curious feature also carried by a significant number of Cro-Magnons. But none of the alleged 'ancestors of us all' fossils from Africa have it, and it is extremely rare in modern people outside Europe." [pp 126-127]

163 posted on 02/26/2006 7:50:33 PM PST by SunkenCiv (My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
"old radiocarbon calculation is now known to be off by as much as several thousand years

Nah . . . who'da thunk!

164 posted on 02/26/2006 7:59:15 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson