Making Islam illegal -- is it the West's only choice?

Renew America ^ | 2/19/2006 | Warner Todd Huston

[Wurlitzer]

"When the right to practice a religion becomes illegal the terrorists have won."

To all on the FR, this is exactly what I am talking about. The war is against a world wide group of stone age debris, cloaking itself with the term religion and we allow them to frame the debate using their term.

This crud called Is-SLIME is nothing more than a 3rd world mafia and we keep calling it a religion then lamenting that the 1st amendment protects it. BS to infinity.

[Dark Skies]

The difference is that Islam has been corrupted to higher degree than any other...

If you honestly believe that islam has been corrupted by the Wahhabists and Salafi's and by Sayyid Qutb, then you and I must agree to disagree. Also, many devout muslims would disagree with your statement.

[Sans-Culotte]

Ever met an American-born Muslim? I know plenty, they're just as pro-America as the average Chistian guy. They understand and are VERY thankful that common law rules in the US, Islamic law is nuts. American-born Muslims are the ideal of what needs to happen in the rest of the world.

I suppose this could happen, but many you may think are pro-USA may be sleepers.

Look at the dude circled in this pic: Looks like the guy next door. After he shaved his beard, he "acted" normal, but was one of the most dedicated of the 9-11 terrorists.

[null and void]

Who are you talking about? My Muslim neighbor three doors down? He doesn't want to kill or convert me. Where would he go to borrow a snowblower?

If he killed you, he'd take your snowblower (and your wife)...

[wvobiwan]

"Islime is not a religion, it is a satanic form of witchcraft.
Of course, Satanism and witchcraft are both legitimate religions."

Bwahahahahah! Realism is sometimes difficult for the relgion-banners Wormy, great post.

[Wurlitzer]

"One stupid Muslim does not justify banning a religion. The crazies win if that happens. It's hard to separate the good from bad, but it's the right course. "

On that explains my error. All this crap over 40 years has been caused by one lone stupid mudslime. Sorry I guess the others are all nice people who mean us no harm and will be more than happy to protest in the streets against this one lone maggot.

[MineralMan]

"We can ban the "klan" but not Christianity. "

We don't ban the "klan." It's a perfectly legal organization. There are chapters in many cities, and they often hold little demonstrations.

We CAN ban cross-burning, lynching, and intimidation. We don't ban the KKK.

[DCPatriot]

Janet Reno (only known antidote for Viagra)...

You misspelled Helen Thomas.

[Natural Law]

We can certainly ban specific corrosive practices. The RICO act would be a good place to start. I would be OK with enforcing existing laws against specific practices such as incitement and advocating violence or the violent overthrow of the government. I would certainly use the seizure of assets and the withholding or cancellation of visas to anyone associated with any Islamic organization that advocates Jihad and begin immediate deportations.

[Centurion2000]

If they doubt this, they can check the histories of Germany and Japan, just to be sure.

They can also check the histories of the Aztecs, Carthaginians and Kali worshipping thugee cults to see what happens to evil religions.

[Wurlitzer]

"But in our culture, in Anglo-Saxon and Roman Law, silence can be deemed consent. IMHO, when it comes to terrorism, the silence of the Muslims is absolutely deafening. "

Brilliant Kenny Bunk! Dittos!

[dmanLA]

They already hate us. I've listend many times to radio talk shows, in which a "moderate" muslim calls in to give his 2¢. The host will try to get them to condemn all terrorist acts, and the muslim invariably replies with "well, under certain circumstances..", or "well, it's a complicated question..."

Remember, these are the moderates.

---

And even when they do condemn terrorist acts, they only mean terrorist acts on Muslims. That is the proper way of interpreting Muslim speak. If you are a non-Muslim, you are nothing.

[Dark Skies]

Off to lunch!

Thx for your input!

DS

[hollywood]

thanks

[nmh]

The problem is catching them.

They break laws and people cover up for them.

[MineralMan]

"The war is against a world wide group of stone age debris, cloaking itself with the term religion" Really? Here is a photo of Dubai. Does this look stone age to you?

[MineralMan]

"The problem is catching them.

They break laws and people cover up for them."

That's the problem with all criminals.

[Sans-Culotte]

That's it. Base an entire 1/6th of the world's population off of a telephone call that MAY OR MAY NOT have been by someone who is as they claim to be. Makes PERFECT sense to me.

Whatever. Of 1/6 of the World's popluation you cite, how many of them "condemn" terrorism? How many of them condemn it silently? Why don't those who condemn it simply suppress the jihadis, and then we'll all get along? Supposedly, it is only a small faction we are talking about. If they are "hijacking" a religion, wht don't the hijack-ees kick their butts and take their religion back? Why can many go on a violent rampage over cartoons, but not acts of barbarism committed in the name of a hijacked religion?

[tumblindice]

Maybe we've reached an accord:
"We don't ban bank robbers, but we do make the actual robbing of banks a crime."
And we don't ban Wahhabi mullahs who might preach the killing of infidels, we just ban the preaching itself.

So we're back to "clear and imminent danger".
Now you say, "But that's a violation of the 1st Amendment . . ."

[dfwgator]

Making Islam illegal is Un-Constitutional, and just a bad idea.

Furthermore, you can bet if Islam is made illegal, Christianity won't be far behind.