Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC Spooked by al-Qaeda (Network pulls TV episode over fears it will upset Muslims)
The Sun (U.K.) ^ | February 15, 2006 | By THOMAS WHITAKER and SARA NATHAN

Posted on 02/16/2006 11:59:41 AM PST by Stoat

EXCLUSIVE
BBC Spooked by al-Qaeda
MI5 drama ... Shaun Dingwall
MI5 drama ... Shaun Dingwall
 
 

By THOMAS WHITAKER and SARA NATHAN

 BBC bosses are ready to AXE a £1million episode of hit drama Spooks in which an al-Qaeda terrorist is shot dead — in case it upsets Muslims.

Filming the assassination plot for the MI5 drama took four weeks.

But actor Shaun Dingwall who plays a renegade Christian gunman, fears he could become a target for fundamentalists if the scene is aired.

In the episode, due to be shown later this year, a religious nut played by Shaun, 35, guns down the fanatic on the steps of London’s High Court.

But production sources admitted it could be canned. One said: “In the climate of Muslim fury over cartoons, Shaun isn’t sure about it all.”


Shaun refused to comment last night.

But Sun security adviser Andy McNab urged the BBC to keep the scene. He said: “Self-censorship would be the thin end of the wedge.”

Labour MP Stephen Pound added: “Giving terrorists a veto over what is shown on TV is the road to madness.

“Al-Qaeda will be objecting to Gardener’s Question Time next. Where does it stop?”

A show spokesman said: “Spooks examines numerous threats facing the UK. Producers, along with Shaun, will track the storyline’s sensitivities in light of the ever-changing news agenda.”

 

 

We asked for your views - here's what you had to say
I love this series and for the BBC to start chopping it about, or not airing incase it causes offence is just another example of how our society is being forced to change unneccesarily. When is somebody going to stick up for what the majority are feeling at having our way of life trampled upon, our freedoms that were once so dear to us being eroded?

If the BBC thought this would be offensive, why did they waste £1million of taxpayers money making this episode?

Patricia Ali
Bethnal Green, London

This is rubbish as it will cause more upset if they don't show it. I'm a muslim and I don't sympathise with terrorists and neither do many. How many times do WE have to say it? The cartoons were a different matter as that was about the prophet not a terrorist.

Navaz Rauf

Like America the UK has become a target for religious extremism. It's because of our terrible foreign policy that we have to suffer idiotic legislations that undermine our freedom of speech. That is why the producers of Spooks get cold feet when tackling extremism for fear of upsetting a few radical muslims.

Are we living in a democracy or a fascist state?

Charlie Meron
Swindon

To axe it would be an insult to Muslims. They are just as intelligent as anybody else and would surely realise that it is just a programme for entertainment using a paid actor to perform. Where will this all end? They would be more offended to think that the tax they are paying is to be wasted!

Mark

Being in this country means we have a right to freedom of expression. If people start bowing down to threats of Muslim extremists we do not know where it will lead.

Mel Quinton
Birmingham

Once again the BBC shows its true colours.

Gordon Roy
Leeds

I was born a Muslim and I don't think the episode should be axed.

It's not going to offend muslims unless they are Al-Queda supporters or sympathisers.

After all it's only entertainment. Stop being dull and boring BBC. Show how everyone feels towards terrorists. The BBC have shown programmes about the IRA - were they offensive?

Addy Durrani
Leeds

I am sick to death of political correctness. What about our rights in a democracy? If we choose to watch this programme, we have the right to do so without the threat of violence from extremists who seem intent on encouraging murder.

I don't like seeing my nation’s flag being burned and police doing nothing about it. If we went over to some of the Muslim countries and complained about the way the West is portrayed on TV they would tell us in no uncertain terms to go away.

Karen
Coventry

I would have thought it would be even more insulting to Muslims to suggest, by cancelling this episode, that they are Al Qaeda sympathisers who would find an attack on extremists and terrorists offensive.

Julie Robinson
Leicester

Air the show BBC - terrorism and Al-Qaeda are sad truths in all our lives. We cannot hide from the dangers and shouldn't hide from the reality.

Why is it these days I feel people should start counter-campaigning to the BBC so we can actually watch certain shows. Take the Jerry Springer Opera a few months ago. Personally I had no interest in the show but I would have stood up with those who did. Surely it comes down to a personal choice, if you think you will be offended by a show then feel free not to watch it.

Sharon Pearson
Godalming

The BBC should realise its responsibilities to the British public, who pay the licence fees and NOT give in.

We fought two world wars in the name of freedom and these idiots want to take that freedom away. Shame on you BBC. And all those others who want to give up the freedom that makes this country great.

Jason Scott

In December 2004, I wrote to the BBC about Jerry Springer The Opera, asking them not to screen the play as it was offensive to Christians of all backgrounds and cultures. Their reply said: “It is not to be taken literally. As a public service broadcaster, it is the BBC’s role to broadcast a range of programmes that will appeal to audiences with very differing tastes and interests.

It is not the intention of the BBC to offend any of our audience in any way or to offend any religious beliefs.”

If the BBC now refuse to screen the intended episode of Spooks in case it offends Muslims, how can the BBC in the light of its reply to me now defend themselves against any charge of double standards?

Keith Doe

I am a muslim and I think Spooks is one of the best TV programmes ever made. Under no circumstances must it be withdrawn.

You cannot compare the cartoon controversy with this programme being shown. The cartoon issue was a direct insult. This is a general storyline and does not relate to any individual. Not showing it would be a great punishment to the wider viewing public.

Mohammed Shafiq
London

We only back off because we are a nation of cowards frightened of Al-Qaeda.

Fran Reho

I am also a big fan of Spooks and I am amazed that the BBC is doing this. I recall an episode last year about suicide bombers which was shown well before July 7. There must have been some idea that this kind of attack was possible in the UK, but this episode was rightly not banned. Surely this would be just as offensive to Muslims?

Come on BBC - where is your backbone?

Jim Pritchard

This is just reflecting what happens in the real world - a bunch of extremists blow up London and take on the world.

Let’s show them being shot for a change instead of injuring innocent civilians. Al-Qaeda are terrorists and have no place in the civilised world.

Anon
Berkshire

I’m a Christian and I find this highly offensive. Not content with wasting my hard-earned licence fee, it sends out the wrong message to hard-line fanatics, who think that they can control what is and isn’t aired.

Spineless doesn’t even BEGIN to summarise the lily-livered, politically-correct hand wringers that choose to waste MY money.

Christopher Sperl
Beaconsfield

Spooks is known for being an excellent drama portraying what it really is like in the MI5 business. So leave it as it is and stop trying to make another big UNNECESSARY issue.

Rubena Begum
Birmingham

How the hell can you have a drama series about MI5 without mentioning terrorism?

The BBC is being taken over by a bunch of liberalistic nerds.

Andrew

Why should this excellent episode be axed?

Jason
Manchester

I sympathise with Shaun Dingwall in his fears but it is giving in to those who would bring destruction to the UK. Us old folks did not back down against Hitler.

Peter Foy
Ontario, Canada

For God’s sake where on earth is this going to end? I am a Catholic and I really enjoyed Jesus of Nazareth and the Thornbirds. Did we kick up a stink about them? If we did people would have laughed in our face.

Kath

It will only offend any Muslims who supports the mad mullahs - their antics in my country certainly offfend me.

Paul
Leeds

I will be sorely disappointed if the BBC axe any episodes of Spooks as they think it will upset muslims. We see far more devastating things on the news that are actually happening to real people. I'm sure that it is only a tiny minority of people who cannot differentiate between real life and TV.

The BBC is one of the institutions that puts the GREAT in Great Britain. It will be a sad day if they ever give in to the minority of mindless idiots who don't have the intelligence to view this sort of thing as the fiction it is meant to be.

Freedom of speech is what my two grandfathers died for during WW2 - not so some religious fanatics can dictate watch we watch on TV.

Don't give in BBC. You'll be letting down not only the fans of Spooks but the whole British nation.

Ben Harman

I can’t believe that we as a nation are so spooked about a few idiots who call themselves muslims and spread fear and hatred among the general public.

I have very good friends who are muslims and enjoy their freedom and new life in the United Kingdom. What does upset them are the idiotic actions that these fanatics impose on our society. They remarked about what would happen if Christians burnt their flag in their countries, it would be a lot more savage than what we do. We should stand up and say enough!

If it is a programme - fiction or fact, it should be viewed. If it offends, then sorry, but we should have a choice.

Steve Parkes



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqueda; alquida; appeasement; bbc; britian; censorship; christianity; cult; dhimmis; dhimmitude; england; greatbritain; islam; islamofascists; jihadnuts; muslim; muslims; nevillechamberlain; peaceinourtime; persecution; spook; spooks; television; terror; terrorism; terrorists; tv; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: butternut_squash_bisque; sure_fine; Jeff Head; maestro; sockmonkey; fizziwig; Peach; Brilliant; ...
Shame it's an incorrect story though.
Perhaps checking the BBC site first might have helped.

news.bbc.co.uk

21 posted on 02/16/2006 12:20:48 PM PST by insider_uk (If it's not blown, it sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
This is rubbish as it will cause more upset if they don't show it. I'm a muslim and I don't sympathise with terrorists and neither do many. How many times do WE have to say it? The cartoons were a different matter as that was about the prophet not a terrorist. Navaz Rauf

Well, if true, I applaud Mr. Rauf for not sympathizing with terrorists. But too few Muslims say it, and not loudly or often enough.

22 posted on 02/16/2006 12:22:37 PM PST by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: insider_uk
Shame it's an incorrect story though.

Thanks. This is the second thread I've been on today that purposely had the headline spun.....thank God for the Internet.

23 posted on 02/16/2006 1:04:01 PM PST by Decepticon (The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Muslims have no reason to be offended. Al Qaeda terrorists aren't "real" muslims. That is why they don't denounce the terrorism. Or so I've been told.


24 posted on 02/16/2006 1:06:28 PM PST by weegee (We are all Danes now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
It is far, far better for the MSM to put stories of how US Soldiers abuse terrorists at Al Ghraib Prison - in an effort to redirect anger at American soldiers, than to actually publish anything at all that may anger even the angriest of Muslims. This way, the presstitutes can feel safe and secure in their cowardly surrender.

Case in point: Just this week, FT (The Financial Times) put a phtotograph of an abused Iraqi prisoner on the FRONT PAGE - again!


In March 2000, CNN showed a picture of the Virgin Mary made out of dung:
http://archives.cnn.com/2000/STYLE/arts/03/27/museum.flap/index.html
Right there on CNN’s website you have a picture of "The Holy Virgin Mary" by British artist Chris Ofili. He used elephant dung and images of female genitalia in that ‘work’.

This garbage posing as ‘art’ was deemed offensive to Christians. CNN had no qualms about showing it and offending Christians. It has remained on their web site until today. Nearly five years now.

In fact, if you click on the link above, you will see this ‘work’ - still proudly displayed on CNN’s website.

Now the violent Muslims are rampaging and burning things - again - about a few cartoons, and CNN says, “CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam.”
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/02/05/cartoon.protests/index.html
Follow this link and read the last line in the article.

Hypocrisy?
Do not trust the MSM.

25 posted on 02/16/2006 1:17:40 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

BBC - Dhimmi cowards!


26 posted on 02/16/2006 1:20:03 PM PST by bayouranger (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
BBC Spooked by al-Qaeda (Network pulls TV episode over fears it will upset Muslims)

"Peace in out time" in this manner
means
dhimmitude for our children, and generations to come
27 posted on 02/16/2006 1:25:14 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

This kind of crap makes me want to get a case of those cartoon t-shirts and give them to all my friends and family. I will not be afraid of terrorist.


28 posted on 02/16/2006 1:55:17 PM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA
"Peace in out time" in this manner means dhimmitude for our children, and generations to come

This is the best thing that could ever happen. We have pu@@sy editors in the US AFRAID to run cartoons of mohammed and actors in the UK AFRAID to act .....People are waking up, and waking up fast.

29 posted on 02/16/2006 1:57:32 PM PST by Decepticon (The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Once the Western press is properly cowed and pictures of pigs are no longer permitted on government property and pork is not served in government eateries (schools included) we are going to find out that an infidel being an infidel is offensive to sensitive Saracens.Maybe they don't have to conquer by sword or by birthrate.


30 posted on 02/16/2006 2:16:46 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Did the Press act this way for the Germans in 1939?


31 posted on 02/16/2006 2:23:03 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
Haven't seen Bauer snuff any muzzies this season. Bad guys are too generic. They do what muzzies do, but it is never even implied that's what they are, even though, no other group seems to fit the profile of these "generic" terrorists. something about being ticked off at Russia, suicidal, but no indication as to their identity, yet.

If it turns out at some point that they are identified as some right wing group .... I tune out.

32 posted on 02/16/2006 2:30:32 PM PST by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: twin2
Unfortunately it looks like MI5 is actually off the air in the US. A&E was buying it season by season, they haven't announced a run date for season four yet or added it to their long term show schedules, and they removed references to it from their website. If we in the US want to see the show, it looks like we'll have to wait for the DVD's.

Personally I thought the show went downhill a bit after Series 2 anyway. It started out great, but by the end of Season 3 was getting a bit touchy feely. When all of the original actors started bailing, it was probably a sign that something was going very wrong with the show.

I'd probably watch seasons 4 and 5 if they aired in the US, but I'm not going to shell out for the DVD's. It IS far better written than 24 and gives a much more realistic view of what the life of a modern spy and counter-terrorist agent are like. It's fascinating stuff, even if the story was getting a bit stale by the end of that last US season.
33 posted on 02/16/2006 2:47:20 PM PST by Arthalion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Manuel is the only normal one! lol

34 posted on 02/16/2006 3:18:58 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

"Let's Not Be Beastly To The Turbans"


35 posted on 02/16/2006 3:24:46 PM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

LOVE it! Too funneee....


36 posted on 02/17/2006 7:05:36 AM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou; sheik yerbouty
Here is another :)


37 posted on 02/17/2006 11:47:47 AM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

~snorrfle!~ You're a photo wizard! ;o)


38 posted on 02/17/2006 11:49:37 AM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
Thank you very much! One more for the road to Mecca :)


39 posted on 02/17/2006 11:54:48 AM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

Road to Mecca? Was that a Bob Hope flick?

My-oh-my, did Mo think really think it would come to this? :o(


40 posted on 02/17/2006 12:07:11 PM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson