Posted on 02/09/2006 2:38:21 PM PST by Andy from Beaverton
What do you think about the controversy over the Prophet Muhammad cartoons?
Where's the #5 response? you know the one that says angry mobs protesting the cartoons should be napalmed in place.
What do you think about the controversy over the Prophet Muhammad cartoons?
The newspapers have the right to publish such materials, even if they are likely to offend many Muslims.
47% 47%
Materials that are likely to offend religious sensibilities should not be published, but there should not be a law against doing so.
21% 21%
There should be laws preventing the publication of such materials and giving redress to people who are offended.
5% 5%
Those who are offended by the publications should limit themselves to nonviolent responses.
27% 27%
Exactly. It's a stupid poll.
It now comes to light that Merete Eldrup, managing director of JP/Politikens Hus, the company that published the cartoons, is the wife of Anders Eldrup. Anders Eldrup is a Bilderberg member who has attended the last five Bilderberg meetings. The Bilderberg Group is a shadowy organization that meets once a year to steer global policy. It is now widely acknowledged that Bilderberg set the date for the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/070206attackiran.htm
The cartoon was published back in Sept. 2005 so why is it only NOW that the outrage is being expressed. Reasonable question, right? For now though, just hold that question in mind.
The Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has made no effort to hide his agenda. The top two of which is to wipe Israel of the map, and prepare the way for arrival of the 12th Imam/Mahdi. When Mahmoud Ahmadinejad took office, he brought into his inner circle another semi-clandestine group of radical Islamic Imams. Imams so radical that they frightened the former Iranian regime who were also fearfull
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would welcome them. That group is called the Hojjatiehs.
As youll see when you read the linked article, that central to this groups doctrine is its conviction that chaos must be created to hasten the coming of the Mahdi.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/GI09Ak01.html
Now back to the question of why the delay in outrage after the initial publication.
Immediately after that initial publication, local Danish Imams had a meeting with the Hojjatieh in Denmark to discuss any action to be taken.
If youve watched any of the news coverage of the protests and rioting, you may or may not have noted the prevalence of Danish flags available to the protestors for burning. There is NO WAY that many flags of one country being within a different country without there having been a preplanned and organized special order and shipment of those flags, all of which would have taken some time to do. Remember the central doctrine of the Hojjatieh and the intent of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, which is to hasten the coming of the Mahdi through the use of chaos, a noted tool of Satan.
By the way, it has also been established that three of the cartoons felt most outrageous were never even published before there was already outrage over them. Hmmmmmmm
Another interesting point concerning the timing of these events.
Jan. 30th 2006 Protests start on precisely the same day that the IAEA decided to refer Iran to the U.N. security council. Ahmadinejad promised beforehand of consequences to western nations if that happened.
True. [:-)
Wow...you can pull resources better than I ever could. I somehow doubted that the protests were just coincidence...but wow. I have no doubt that Ahmadinejad had something to do with what's going on.
Newspapers have the right to publish the cartooons - 48%
Offensive materials should not be published, but not a crime - 20%
There should be laws against it - 5%
Those who are offended should not respond with violence - 27%
5:58PM
They have a mission and your head and my head are a part of it. They might can separate my head from my body but they can never separate me from my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Remember when that kooky artist displayed Jesus in a jar of urine. (Name started with "T" I think) We didn't like it but nobody got killed over it. We left it to the Lord to ferret out. Besides. we don't have pictures of Jesus anyway. Their so called prophet doesn't impress me one way or the other. Who cares! Not me. He sure is a hairy dude.
I'm sure they want it ONLY for content pertaining to Muslims.
that one was faked by a Muslim
Y said it better than I did.
That should be "You", not Y said it......
How about: Those who are offended by the publications should limit themselves to violence upon themselves.
(Don't just whack those knives until your head is a just a bit bloody; start at your own neck and cut all the way through.)
current results---
What do you think about the controversy over the Prophet Muhammad cartoons?
The newspapers have the right to publish such materials, even if they are likely to offend many Muslims.
51%
Materials that are likely to offend religious sensibilities should not be published, but there should not be a law against doing so.
18%
There should be laws preventing the publication of such materials and giving redress to people who are offended.
4%
Those who are offended by the publications should limit themselves to nonviolent responses.
27%
52-18-4-26 now
A lot of people, a growing number every day, also think so.
It's a shame they're in the papers. They should be on TV!
BwaaaHaahaaaaaa!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.