Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'd like to see this confirmed by other sources.
1 posted on 02/09/2006 10:33:45 AM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: conserv13

This national journal is Chrissy Matthew's source for his show Hairball...so expect this to be his main topic tonight.


2 posted on 02/09/2006 10:36:44 AM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

That's impossible, because we have already heard that Plame's identity was not classified at that time.


3 posted on 02/09/2006 10:38:12 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

The prosecutor has refused to even state that any classified material was even leaked. This is a totally bogus, lame attempt to revive the Democrats' smear campaign.


4 posted on 02/09/2006 10:41:10 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

Anonymous sources continue to multiply in this story.


5 posted on 02/09/2006 10:41:30 AM PST by jazusamo (A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13
What has this to do with Valerie Plame or for that matter obstruction of justice?

And of course we have the always interesting "unnamed sources"
7 posted on 02/09/2006 10:43:19 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

Reverse PING! :o)

Get a load of THIS!


8 posted on 02/09/2006 10:43:46 AM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

I'd like it confirmed by NAMED sources - and then they should be prosecuted for leaking the info, which is secret (from the grand jury).


9 posted on 02/09/2006 10:43:59 AM PST by MortMan (Trains stop at train stations. On my desk is a workstation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

So is Libby lying? That's the real question here. If he is, then Cheney will contradict him and it will be a he said/he said thing.

If he's not lying, however, this is going to be an ungood thing.


11 posted on 02/09/2006 10:44:45 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

If this is so, why wasn't Cheney indicted?


12 posted on 02/09/2006 10:45:39 AM PST by mystery-ak (Army Wife.....toughest job in the military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

LOL, Saddam and Sons defense team working hard!


14 posted on 02/09/2006 10:46:55 AM PST by roses of sharon ("I would rather men ask why I have no statue, than why I have one". ) (Cato the Elder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13
This is as dubious as the earlier story about the Judge's opinion, based on old comments by Fitzgerald, that Valerie Plame was in fact a covert agent. This is just the sort of thing Clinton would do, when that sieve-like administration over saw the worst compromising of national security secrets in American history. We hear again and again how secretive the Bush administration is, yet now the accusation is that Cheney would jeopardize intelligence secrecy for minor political points. Plenty of reason not to buy this one folks. Just chalk it up to just another "Ratherism" without serious basis. Let's see some real proof, and then we'll talk. In the meantime, I am tired of hearing "Wolf, wolf" every five minutes from the partisan biased MSM, as their credibility is long, long been reduced to zero.
19 posted on 02/09/2006 10:53:22 AM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13
OMG, it's Murry Waas again.

C'mon, guys - remember this dude?

24 posted on 02/09/2006 10:57:40 AM PST by M. Thatcher ( I truly hope for two things before I die. The death of the Democrat Party, and the death of Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

Impossible.

Of all people, VP Cheney would never authorize the disclosure of ANY classified info for ANY reason.

Classified is Classified. period. End of discussion.


25 posted on 02/09/2006 10:59:38 AM PST by roaddog727 (P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Buried in this story are the following ...

Libby has never claimed that Cheney encouraged him to disclose information about Plame to the media. ...

Finally, the new information indicates that Libby is likely to pursue a defense during his trial that he was broadly "authorized" by Cheney and other "superiors" to defend the Bush administration in making the case to go to war. Libby does not, however, appear to be claiming that he was acting specifically on Cheney's behalf in disclosing information about Plame to the press.

Note too, the article leads the reader to think in terms of "this is a leak case." But it's not. The charges against Libby are that he deliberately mislead investigators.

The thrust of the article in that regard is that Libby's defense team wants to show that Libby was pressed with bigger fish than affair de Plame, and therefore forgot that he knew for a fact that Plame worked for the CIA when he talked with investigators.

27 posted on 02/09/2006 11:00:18 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

Just ask Joesph Wilson IV. I'm sure he'll be able to repeat it verbatim.


30 posted on 02/09/2006 11:09:22 AM PST by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

The author of this story, which by the way is not a new story, is trying to conflate approval Libby may have had to discuss some "classified" info with the press, into an "approval" to reveal Valerie Plame's "classified" identity, when in fact it is not such an approval any more than is it evidence that her status was "classified".

Yet, you can bet that the dim-witted Dim Matthews will jump t o every erroneous conclusion the author is trying to present.


31 posted on 02/09/2006 11:10:43 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13
"Maryland Libertarian. I live in Highlandtown, Baltimore."

May I be one of many who will probably offer you 'condolences' for your honesty!.

33 posted on 02/09/2006 11:12:59 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

I think I'll add a keyword to the list. One that describes this precisely!


35 posted on 02/09/2006 11:15:18 AM PST by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

Um, Libby is being charged with obstructing justice, not revealing classified information. So how would saying Cheney told him to release classified information help him in that regard? Hell all libby has to show is one person told him and that person be a reporter.


38 posted on 02/09/2006 11:25:19 AM PST by mykpfsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13
Murray Waas Never-Has-Been
39 posted on 02/09/2006 11:30:15 AM PST by Beckwith (The liberal press has picked sides ... and they have sided with the Islamofascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson