To: conserv13
I'd like it confirmed by NAMED sources - and then they should be prosecuted for leaking the info, which is secret (from the grand jury).
9 posted on
02/09/2006 10:43:59 AM PST by
MortMan
(Trains stop at train stations. On my desk is a workstation...)
To: MortMan
Ohhhhhhhh the irony of it all.
The grand jury investigation of a "leak", in which the grand jury proceedings are to remain confidential, and you have a "leak". Try wrapping your head around that one.
(this is all bases on the assumption that the story is true, which it probably is not.)
75 posted on
02/09/2006 3:00:54 PM PST by
A Texan
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: MortMan
I'd like it confirmed by NAMED sources - and then they should be prosecuted for leaking the info,"""
What if it was Libby who leaked it, or his lawyer acting to further Libby's litigation strategy? Would you still want the leaker prosecuted?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson