Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Capitol's Tempest in a T-Shirt
The Washington ComPost ^ | 2/2/06 | Petula Dvorak

Posted on 02/02/2006 6:32:07 AM PST by steve-b

Two T-shirts -- one black, the other heather gray -- spotted in the House gallery the night of the president's State of the Union speech caused a major ruckus on Capitol Hill.

It spilled into yesterday and came complete with impassioned political speeches, strident questions about rights being trampled, threats of lawsuits and a hat-in-hand apology from the U.S. Capitol Police chief.

The black shirt with white letters was worn by celebrated war protester Cindy Sheehan; the white letters read: "2,245 Dead. How Many More?" Beverly Young, the wife of a Republican congressman, sported a heather gray top with red, white and blue letters saying, "Support the Troops."

The wearers were hustled out of the House gallery by Capitol police who said the shirts amounted to protesting....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: protest; rudedems; sheehan; sotu; tshirt; young
Frankly, Beverly Young and her hubby need to grow up. We're supposed to have one law for everybody in this country. If we stipulate that we need this rule in place to prevent disruptions in the gallery during the SoTU, then it has to be enforced across the board.
1 posted on 02/02/2006 6:32:10 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steve-b

What I'm angry about is that there were apologies!


2 posted on 02/02/2006 6:36:59 AM PST by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
I would think that printed sloganeering would be prohibited in the chambers. Otherwise, where would it end? Could the entire Democratic contingent show up in 'Bush Lied, People Died' T-shirts? Will we have banners like Foghat concerts?

Electioneering is barred within the proximity of polling places, it seems that a legislative body should be free from such advertising as a matter of decorum, on whatever side.

3 posted on 02/02/2006 6:37:47 AM PST by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

What part of "a t-shirt is inappropriate attire for the SOTU address" do these people not get? Printed with a slogan or not. (and a sweat suit is just reprehensible)

That said, if banners are not allowed, then it was proper to remove them from the gallery...pro slogan or anti-slogan. Neither has a case, especially since there is a precendent with the guy that was ejected for a Clinton speech.


4 posted on 02/02/2006 6:41:38 AM PST by GOP_Proud ("The only reason you're not unconcious is I don't want to carry you."...Jack Bauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I agree. There is a time and place to wear T-shirts, the SOTU is not the place. Sad that we need the police to enforce the rules that these two grown adult women should have known. I expect such behavior from Ms. Shaheen, she is just downright self-absorbed in her own little mind, but Mrs. Young should have known better.


5 posted on 02/02/2006 6:43:58 AM PST by Gerish (Choose God, he has already chosen you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

Precisely. Caving and apologizing opens the door to the day when the SoTU gallery is full of nuts like that guy who used to hold up "JOHN 3:16" banners at football games.


6 posted on 02/02/2006 6:45:08 AM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Well Said!!! I agree and I understand that I can't were this in the chamber.


7 posted on 02/02/2006 6:47:44 AM PST by W04Man (Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign We Did It! NOW.... PLEASE STAY THE COURSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gerish
Certainly, Mr. Young (who has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution) ought to know better than to say this:
Young said he wouldn't be so mad if it were just Sheehan. "I totally disagree with everything she stands for," he said. But by removing his wife, Gainer's officers clearly "acted precipitously," Young said.
Here's a free clue for you, Congressman: This attitude that there should be rule for commoners and a different rule for your exalted self is one of the reasons people despise politicians.
8 posted on 02/02/2006 6:48:00 AM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
Electioneering is barred within the proximity of polling places, it seems that a legislative body should be free from such advertising as a matter of decorum, on whatever side.

Oh PUHLEEZE! You've never watched the HoR when Pelosi speaks (or Sheilah Jack@$$ Lee, or Kerosene Maxine, or...)

9 posted on 02/02/2006 6:49:41 AM PST by sauropod ("Here Lies Joe Biden, Buried Under His Own Words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gerish
Mrs. Young should have known better.

Damn fool... I hope hubby 'corrected' her later.

10 posted on 02/02/2006 6:49:58 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Look at the bright side: This way one from each side got tossed, so they can't claim it was just a rule to prevent anti-bush people from protesting.


11 posted on 02/02/2006 6:52:18 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I have no problem with a husband publicly supporting his wife, as long as he doesn't turn to belittling others in the process. OTOH, in private he needs to remind her that she needs to make him look good, too.


12 posted on 02/02/2006 6:55:09 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
The black shirt with white letters was worn by celebrated war protester Cindy Sheehan;

Celebrated? CELEBRATED??? Move along, folks. No bias here.

13 posted on 02/02/2006 6:56:29 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Visitors to the galleries bhave had to abide by the same rules for years.

If it's good enough for John Q. Public every day of the year, it's good enough for this Congress critter's wife and Cindy Sheehan.

If that loudmouthed Congress critter doesn't like the rules, he should convince his colleagues to change them.

14 posted on 02/02/2006 6:58:49 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Correct, but to me it wasn't even about t-shirts. Cindy Sheehan should not be allowed anywhere near the President. She is a stalker. She despises the President, blames him for her son's death and is clearly unhinged. Earlier the same day, she spoke at the Bush impeachment forum and said right over Cspan that if bin laden killed three thousand people on 9-11, then Bush is ten times the terrorist bin laden is because Bush admitted that 30,000 people had been killed in Iraq since we invaded. Again, to me, this is not about t-shirts, although if it were, your point is spot on.


15 posted on 02/02/2006 7:00:12 AM PST by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
There are rules of decorum for those who wish to attend these events. If some people are unable to control themselves, they ought not attend.

It's not the place for HEY LOOK AT ME kind of behaviour.

It's enough that the congress creatures and sinators make asses of themselves for national TV.

16 posted on 02/02/2006 7:03:46 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

It is about the t-shirts. She was an approved guest and had a right to attend- as long as she followed the rules.


17 posted on 02/02/2006 7:08:08 AM PST by brothers4thID (Being lectured by Ted Kennedy on ethics is not unlike being lectured on dating protocol by Ted Bundy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist

Our operatives are smarter than their operatives.


18 posted on 02/02/2006 7:26:37 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I know Young is a Republican, but he sounds like a pretty big jerk. As if Karl Rove doesn't have more important things to think about than his wife's T-shirt?


19 posted on 02/02/2006 9:12:32 AM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson