Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush is kicking away his base
Townhall.com ^ | Jan 30, 2006 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 01/31/2006 11:05:56 AM PST by robowombat

Bush is kicking away his base By Phyllis Schlafly

Jan 30, 2006

The conservative movement that elected Ronald Reagan twice, George H.W. Bush once, and George W. Bush II twice, is essentially a movement of grass-rooters who don't like to take orders from the top and who revolt when they believe they are betrayed or bossed by those they elected. That's why the grass roots abandoned the first George Bush when he reneged on his "no new taxes, read my lips" promise.

The tough political tactics used by union bosses and Democratic machine bosses simply don't sit well with conservative Republicans.

Resentment against the current Bush administration is still festering about the combination of threats and bribes that pushed through close votes in Congress to pass the costly Medicare prescription drug bill in 2003 and Central American Trade Agreement in 2004.

Maybe the intra-party divisions between fiscal vs. Big Government conservatives that lay behind the former battle, and between pro vs. anti free-traders in the latter battle, were evenly balanced enough that the Bush administration alienated only a handful of Republicans. But in demanding a guest-worker plan that smacks of amnesty, the Bush administration is taking the unpopular side of a party division that is at least 80-20.

In December, the House passed a border-security bill authored by House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis.. The bill rejected support for Bush's guest worker/amnesty plan. Since 88 percent of Republican House members voted for this bill, that should have been a wake-up call to the president.

Shortly thereafter, Arizona Republican National Committee member Randy Pullen gathered enough signatures to present a resolution to the Republican National Committee at its Jan. 19-20 meeting in Washington, D.C., which endorsed border security measures and opposed any guest worker plan.

A competing resolution endorsing border security plus a guest worker plan was floated by the RNC's Bill Crocker of Texas. After he realized the strong tide against guest workers, he began negotiating a compromise with Pullen, and one version of the compromise eliminated guest workers.

When the RNC resolutions committee met Jan. 19, the chairman, Idaho's Blake Hall, brought up the original Crocker resolution that included guest worker language. An attempt by one committeeman to substitute the Crocker-Pullen compromise was ruled out of order, and then a motion to remove the guest worker language was voted down 5 to 3.

That evening, the Bush administration sent in its big guns, Vice President Dick Cheney and Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., to insist that RNC members support the guest worker plan or else they would be labeled disloyal and disrespectful of President Bush. Republican Party chairman Ken Mehlman made the rounds to regional caucuses to demand approval of Bush's guest worker plan and defeat of the Pullen resolution.

At the RNC meeting on Jan. 20, the Hall-approved resolution was incorporated and passed as part of a package of nine resolutions in order to preclude a specific vote on the border security-guest worker issue. The Pullen resolution did not come up.

This donnybrook happened on the same day that the New York Times reported that 18,207 illegal immigrants from nations other than Mexico have been the beneficiaries of the Bush administration's scandalous "catch and release" procedure in the three months since Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff promised to "return every single illegal entrant - no exceptions." Catch and release means that the illegal immigrants from nations other than Mexico are not deported. But after they are apprehended, they are released on their own recognizance with instructions to reappear a few weeks later, with everybody understanding that they will disappear into the U.S. population.

Also on the same day, Lou Dobbs reported on CNN-TV that Mexican troops are crossing our southern border twice a month in uniform, in military vehicles and carrying military weapons. The Bush administration's response to this invasion is don't ask, don't tell.

It's bad enough that President Bush is pursuing a vastly unpopular guest worker-amnesty plan, but the administration's bullying to prevent debate and a vote by the full Republican National Committee was intolerable. It forecasts the sort of intimidation we can anticipate in the upcoming Senate debate about Bush's guest worker plan.

Why are President Bush and Karl Rove so tone deaf on this issue? Some speculate that the Bush administration is in the pocket of big business lobbying interests that want the cheap labor made available by the government's failure to enforce our immigration laws.

Others speculate that Bush and Rove are hallucinating that Hispanics will vote Republican. That won't happen; Hispanics vote 55 to 75 percent Democratic because, since they are mostly in the low-income sector of our economy, they vote for the party that promises the social benefits of the welfare state, not for the party that pretends to support fiscal integrity and small government.

The administration-imposed RNC defeat of the majority view of Republicans is bad news for the 2006 congressional elections. Bush is alienating his political base and creating what one RNC member calls an "enthusiasm deficit." In the words of the old adage, elephants (i.e., conservative Republicans) never forget.

Phyllis Schlafly is the President and Founder of the Eagle Forum


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bashinghispanics; border; bordersecurity; bushamnesty; duplicatethread; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; invasionusa; openborders; schlafly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720721-735 next last
To: justshutupandtakeit

No thanks. I'll let you thrill yourself with tales of the dangerous border vigilantes.

You can swap scary stories with the hard left- they will tell you all about rednecks ready to lynch blacks, you can tell them about vigilantes ready to shoot Mexicans. And then your apolitical friends can add in their alien abduction stories. There's a sort of perfection to it.


701 posted on 01/31/2006 10:40:50 PM PST by Pelham ("Borders? We don' need no stinking borders!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

I leave fantasies to the experienced and you did well. Carry on.


702 posted on 01/31/2006 10:46:31 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
But if the only way to get your vote is an impossibility,

There's something wonderfully ironic in finding Pollyana preaching defeatism.

703 posted on 01/31/2006 10:47:54 PM PST by Pelham ("Borders? We don' need no stinking borders!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
Oh give it a rest Phyllis. You got Alito. Stop your b-tching you old hag.

That's not a very nice thing to say about a conservative lady who's been fighting the good fight long before you and me.

On the border issue she's absolutely right, the grass roots of the Republican party does not want the guest worker program but instead the borders secured and laws enforced. If you think that going against those wishes has no chance whatsoever of affecting future elections than you have no real understanding of how politics has traditionally worked in the United States.

704 posted on 02/01/2006 6:20:32 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Derelict President bump
705 posted on 02/01/2006 6:24:57 AM PST by dagnabbit (Vicente Fox's opening line at the Mexico-USA summit meeting: "Bring out the Gimp!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
I try to play against type now and then. ; )

Actually, Pollyanna was a realist. That is what made her so irritating. In any case, there are some people who have decided that there is nothing the GOP can do to regain their vote (If they genuinely had it in the first place.)

Why would we want to alienate the millions of voters to regain a few thousand...by promising to do something that has no chance of happening? That may be defeatism, but I see it as an honest assessment of reality as it exists.

Once we see the realities, THEN we look for the best plan, the best possibilities we can create to improve the situation—realistically. Not perfection, but progress.
706 posted on 02/01/2006 7:00:20 AM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Thomas J did not create the "RAT party", (I'd say Ol' Hickory deserves that dubious honor). He was actually a Republican*, as he himself states in many of his speeches, including his first inaugural address.
Now we can all nitpick as to what exact moment defined the creation of the two modern major political parties, but there is no doubt that the Democrats of the modern era bear no semblance to the party, under Thomas J, that split with Washington and the Federalists.

* This term applies, accurately, to the ideology of the faction that broke with the Federalists. It is not meant to infer that Thomas J was the founder of a party that evolved into the G.O.P.

707 posted on 02/01/2006 7:14:45 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball

~bowing politely~


708 posted on 02/01/2006 7:15:33 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Old news.

Oh? The border invasion has stopped now? Really?

709 posted on 02/01/2006 7:21:00 AM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
Why would we want to alienate the millions of voters to regain a few thousand...by promising to do something that has no chance of happening?

Is it too much to ask for a President to not push a safe harbor for criminals, and to not call it something as innocent sounding as a "guest worker program".

The wording that he uses panders directly to the left and to big business.

If that's how he and the GOP want to pull votes in to offset the Conservatives in the party (which apparently are fast becoming a minority), that's fine.

The writing has been on the wall - the GOP's website has been removing the word "Conservative" from various pages here and there (and somebody told me the 2004 party platform didn't contain the word "conservative" at all, although I find that hard to believe).

It's not you at all pollyannaish, btw, it's me - I have not changed my beliefs over the past 20 or 30 years, but the party has definitely changed in that time, and I'm holding on to an image of what once was.
710 posted on 02/01/2006 7:23:12 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 706 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell

No, it's old news that Bush is kicking away his base by refusing to uphold his oath to protect this nation from invasion.

He's been failing for his entire term.


711 posted on 02/01/2006 7:24:13 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com ( You'll love Laffey! http://www.electlaffey.com Chafeehas2go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
You mean he won't get re-elected?

He's not up for reelection. A lot of republican representatives and senators will be, though. Not to mention some other republican candidate for president.

712 posted on 02/01/2006 7:24:33 AM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
It's interesting that he doesn't answer critics about the rationale for the specific points of his plan. He just keeps repeating the points of the plan.

713 posted on 02/01/2006 7:42:25 AM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 711 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell

Reminds me of certain FR posters.


714 posted on 02/01/2006 7:59:03 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com ( You'll love Laffey! http://www.electlaffey.com Chafeehas2go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish

I agree.


715 posted on 02/01/2006 7:59:40 AM PST by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Lou Dobbs .... I watch him every night I'm home. I prefer him to Bret Hume's very good FoxNews news hour. Which I usually tune into for the least 15 minutes to see the Fox All Stars

I believe Lou Dobbs long before I believe an open borders stooge Sam Brownback. His act is very old and tired. this nation is being invaded!!!


716 posted on 02/01/2006 8:03:27 AM PST by dennisw ("What one man can do another can do" - The Edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

Correct. Hold our guys (Republicans) feet to the fire on immigration. They need a push in the right direction


717 posted on 02/01/2006 8:05:47 AM PST by dennisw ("What one man can do another can do" - The Edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
718 posted on 02/01/2006 8:27:46 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
He's not up for reelection.

================================

He's not? Darn!

719 posted on 02/01/2006 8:55:14 AM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 712 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
a movement of grass-rooters who don't like to take orders from the top and who revolt when they believe they are betrayed or bossed by those they elected.

Damn straight! Just like the framers invisioned!! Duh!

720 posted on 02/01/2006 9:28:40 AM PST by mosquitobite (The penalty for refusing to participate in politics is you end up being governed by your inferiors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720721-735 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson