Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush is kicking away his base
Townhall.com ^ | Jan 30, 2006 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 01/31/2006 11:05:56 AM PST by robowombat

Bush is kicking away his base By Phyllis Schlafly

Jan 30, 2006

The conservative movement that elected Ronald Reagan twice, George H.W. Bush once, and George W. Bush II twice, is essentially a movement of grass-rooters who don't like to take orders from the top and who revolt when they believe they are betrayed or bossed by those they elected. That's why the grass roots abandoned the first George Bush when he reneged on his "no new taxes, read my lips" promise.

The tough political tactics used by union bosses and Democratic machine bosses simply don't sit well with conservative Republicans.

Resentment against the current Bush administration is still festering about the combination of threats and bribes that pushed through close votes in Congress to pass the costly Medicare prescription drug bill in 2003 and Central American Trade Agreement in 2004.

Maybe the intra-party divisions between fiscal vs. Big Government conservatives that lay behind the former battle, and between pro vs. anti free-traders in the latter battle, were evenly balanced enough that the Bush administration alienated only a handful of Republicans. But in demanding a guest-worker plan that smacks of amnesty, the Bush administration is taking the unpopular side of a party division that is at least 80-20.

In December, the House passed a border-security bill authored by House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis.. The bill rejected support for Bush's guest worker/amnesty plan. Since 88 percent of Republican House members voted for this bill, that should have been a wake-up call to the president.

Shortly thereafter, Arizona Republican National Committee member Randy Pullen gathered enough signatures to present a resolution to the Republican National Committee at its Jan. 19-20 meeting in Washington, D.C., which endorsed border security measures and opposed any guest worker plan.

A competing resolution endorsing border security plus a guest worker plan was floated by the RNC's Bill Crocker of Texas. After he realized the strong tide against guest workers, he began negotiating a compromise with Pullen, and one version of the compromise eliminated guest workers.

When the RNC resolutions committee met Jan. 19, the chairman, Idaho's Blake Hall, brought up the original Crocker resolution that included guest worker language. An attempt by one committeeman to substitute the Crocker-Pullen compromise was ruled out of order, and then a motion to remove the guest worker language was voted down 5 to 3.

That evening, the Bush administration sent in its big guns, Vice President Dick Cheney and Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., to insist that RNC members support the guest worker plan or else they would be labeled disloyal and disrespectful of President Bush. Republican Party chairman Ken Mehlman made the rounds to regional caucuses to demand approval of Bush's guest worker plan and defeat of the Pullen resolution.

At the RNC meeting on Jan. 20, the Hall-approved resolution was incorporated and passed as part of a package of nine resolutions in order to preclude a specific vote on the border security-guest worker issue. The Pullen resolution did not come up.

This donnybrook happened on the same day that the New York Times reported that 18,207 illegal immigrants from nations other than Mexico have been the beneficiaries of the Bush administration's scandalous "catch and release" procedure in the three months since Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff promised to "return every single illegal entrant - no exceptions." Catch and release means that the illegal immigrants from nations other than Mexico are not deported. But after they are apprehended, they are released on their own recognizance with instructions to reappear a few weeks later, with everybody understanding that they will disappear into the U.S. population.

Also on the same day, Lou Dobbs reported on CNN-TV that Mexican troops are crossing our southern border twice a month in uniform, in military vehicles and carrying military weapons. The Bush administration's response to this invasion is don't ask, don't tell.

It's bad enough that President Bush is pursuing a vastly unpopular guest worker-amnesty plan, but the administration's bullying to prevent debate and a vote by the full Republican National Committee was intolerable. It forecasts the sort of intimidation we can anticipate in the upcoming Senate debate about Bush's guest worker plan.

Why are President Bush and Karl Rove so tone deaf on this issue? Some speculate that the Bush administration is in the pocket of big business lobbying interests that want the cheap labor made available by the government's failure to enforce our immigration laws.

Others speculate that Bush and Rove are hallucinating that Hispanics will vote Republican. That won't happen; Hispanics vote 55 to 75 percent Democratic because, since they are mostly in the low-income sector of our economy, they vote for the party that promises the social benefits of the welfare state, not for the party that pretends to support fiscal integrity and small government.

The administration-imposed RNC defeat of the majority view of Republicans is bad news for the 2006 congressional elections. Bush is alienating his political base and creating what one RNC member calls an "enthusiasm deficit." In the words of the old adage, elephants (i.e., conservative Republicans) never forget.

Phyllis Schlafly is the President and Founder of the Eagle Forum


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bashinghispanics; border; bordersecurity; bushamnesty; duplicatethread; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; invasionusa; openborders; schlafly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 721-735 next last
To: Deb

Under the Nafta agreement the government whose court system is challenged is responsible for awards by the tribunals.

"This is the biggest threat to United States judicial independence that no one has heard of and even fewer people understand," said John D. Echeverria, a law professor at Georgetown University.

--Nafta Tribunals Stir U.S. Worries


641 posted on 01/31/2006 4:50:19 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Read the family biography. They lived there because they chose to, so papa George could "make it on his own" They could have gone back to the wealth whenever they felt they had had enough. Not too many of us have that option.


642 posted on 01/31/2006 4:52:19 PM PST by buckeye49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I thought Al-Qaida was "The Base".


643 posted on 01/31/2006 4:52:36 PM PST by You Dirty Rats (Poll: Is JF Kerry Respected? Yes 25% No 72% Other 3%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies]

To: jla
Howlin...Phyllis Schlafly, thank God in Heaven, is the polar opposite of you. :^)

I can't tell you how thrilled I am about that.

644 posted on 01/31/2006 4:53:32 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: buckeye49; Dog Gone
They lived there because they chose to, so papa George could "make it on his own" They could have gone back to the wealth whenever they felt they had had enough. Not too many of us have that option.

So you will hold that against him? Since when is class warfare a Conservative trait?
645 posted on 01/31/2006 4:53:49 PM PST by MikefromOhio (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: buckeye49

Okay, so they chose not to be wealthy, so that doesn't count. They really were, I guess, and that house is just an illusion.


646 posted on 01/31/2006 4:54:31 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
The Conservative base is a lot stronger then the Hillary base so I am not worried.

I truly believe that die hard democrats will hold their nose and vote for Hillary and a larger then usual percent will not even vote as opposed to voting for her. The turnout by democrats shall be low if she is the candidate.

This is where people get "hung up" on the wrong issues. It shouldn't be about "who wins elections," although we're in a world heap of hurt if the Dims regain power anytime soon.

But illegal immigration is destroying, irrevocably, this nation! Pretty soon we're gonna see this country splintered and factioned. Muslims are gonna demand Islamic rule in areas controlled by them and anyone not believing that is naive.

Mexicans have already stated their intentions of taking over our nation and appear to be well under way in the souther states. How long will it be before their higher birth rates produce a majority population capable of dominating elections and therefore policies, issues, and even laws.

To not see this is to be blind and devoid of common sense. Yet, Americans will decry it when it happens as if they're shocked. Sadly, for once, it will in fact be too late to do anything about it.

And let me ask, what happens if a majority of people in a state vote to have that state revert to the control of Mexico? IDK, but with immigrant leaders, who could easily be voted in by a majority of immigrants along with willing idiot libs, it's entirely possible. Don't think it isn't.

It may take 10, 20, or 30 years, but that time will pass just like flowered plants fade in the autumn.

647 posted on 01/31/2006 4:56:29 PM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

I don't hold it against him. Just setting the record straight. No class warfare here. My family was poor, poor, poor, and we have all done very well without a fortune to back us up.


648 posted on 01/31/2006 4:56:42 PM PST by buckeye49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish

lets hope he gets one more chance and puts JRB up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


649 posted on 01/31/2006 4:56:46 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: buckeye49

If you aren't holding it against him, why do you continue to bring it up, just wondering?

Sure it's nice to have that to fall back on, but they didn't, so it's really irrelevant.


650 posted on 01/31/2006 4:57:37 PM PST by MikefromOhio (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 648 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

go seahawks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


651 posted on 01/31/2006 4:58:07 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

We do need your vote. Illegal immigration is a problem. That is not the issue.

But if the only way to get your vote is an impossibility, then we are kind of screwed, aren't we?

The plans proposed so far by people in your camp will not happen—ever. There are too many laws, INCLUDING the Constitution itself, prohibiting it from happening. I'm sorry, but it is the truth. We can lessen the problem, but we can not solve it by building a wall, ripping people from their homes and away from their children and tossing them all out in a matter of months.

Your vote is important. It is hard to loose. This rift makes me unbelievably sad. But I'm sorry, but I'm not willing to change the Constitution. Even for your vote.


652 posted on 01/31/2006 4:58:31 PM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Works for me! Here's to one more!


653 posted on 01/31/2006 5:00:22 PM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Actually, I agree with you. It is irrelevant. The only thing he has going for him on this earth is his faith, and I hold on to that as much as he does. He is our President, I voted for him twice. I just don't get the attitude about the border. It's insane. I keep telling myself that he has pulled a lot of things out of the fire, and I hope that's just one more thing he pulls off somehow, but I am getting discouraged.


654 posted on 01/31/2006 5:03:59 PM PST by buckeye49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: jla
"But you'll step on all the sidewalk cracks and break her back...won't you!?

What? I hope you aren't Schlafly, because she used to be able to carry an argument a little better than that.

655 posted on 01/31/2006 5:04:23 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Mrs. S v. Howlin



Phyllis Schlafly

Phyllis Schlafly has been a national leader of the conservative movement since the publication of her best-selling 1964 book, A Choice Not An Echo. She has been a leader of the pro-family movement since 1972, when she started her national volunteer organization now called Eagle Forum. In a ten-year battle, Mrs. Schlafly led the pro-family movement to victory over the principal legislative goal of the radical feminists, called the Equal Rights Amendment. An articulate and successful opponent of the radical feminist movement, she appears in debate on college campuses more frequently than any other conservative. She was named one of the 100 most important women of the 20th century by the Ladies' Home Journal.

Mrs. Schlafly's monthly newsletter called The Phyllis Schlafly Report is now in its 38th year. Her syndicated column appears in 100 newspapers, her radio commentaries are heard daily on 460 stations, and her radio talk show on education called "Phyllis Schlafly Live" is heard weekly on 45 stations. Both can be heard on the internet.

Mrs. Schlafly is the author or editor of 20 books on subjects as varied as family and feminism (The Power of the Positive Woman), nuclear strategy (Strike From Space and Kissinger on the Couch), education (Child Abuse in the Classroom), child care (Who Will Rock the Cradle?), and a phonics book (Turbo Reader). Her most recent book, Feminist Fantasies, is a collection of essays on feminism in the media, workplace, home, and the military

Mrs. Schlafly is a lawyer and served as a member of the Commission on the Bicentennial of the U.S. Constitution, 1985-1991, appointed by President Reagan. She has testified before more than 50 Congressional and State Legislative committees on constitutional, national defense, and family issues.

Mrs. Schlafly is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Washington University, received her J.D. from Washington University Law School, and received her Master's in Political Science from Harvard University.

Phyllis Schlafly is America's best-known advocate of the dignity and honor that we as a society owe to the role of fulltime homemaker. The mother of six children, she was the 1992 Illinois Mother of the Year.


More Complete Biography of Phyllis Schlafly
 
Phyllis Schlafly was named one of the 100 most important women of the 20th century by the Ladies' Home Journal. She has been a national leader of the conservative movement since the publication of her best-selling 1964 book, A Choice Not An Echo, and a leader of the pro-family movement since 1972, when she started her national volunteer organization now called Eagle Forum.

Mrs. Schlafly is the founder and president of Eagle Forum, a national organization of citizens who participate as volunteers in the public policymaking process. It maintains offices on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. and in Alton, Illinois. She is also the founder and president of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, a think-tank which has its national headquarters at the Eagle Forum Education Center in St. Louis.

Books: Mrs. Schlafly is the author or editor of 20 books on subjects as varied as family and feminism (The Power of the Positive Woman), nuclear strategy (Strike From Space and Kissinger on the Couch), education (Child Abuse in the Classroom), child care (Who Will Rock the Cradle?), and foreign policy (Allegiance). Her two most recent books are the result of her lifetime dedication to the problem of illiteracy and are based on a phonics system she developed to teach reading skills. First Reader (1994) is designed for the beginning child, and Turbo Reader (2001) is a revised version for the student of any age.

Other Writings: Mrs. Schlafly's newsletter called The Phyllis Schlafly Report has been published monthly since 1967 and is now in its 38th year. Her syndicated columns, distributed by Copley News Service since 1976, appear in 100 newspapers. She wrote a monthly article for the DAR Magazine from 1977 to 1995. Her articles have appeared in a variety of anthologies and other periodicals including the Radcliffe Quarterly, the Wall Street Journal, George, and Human Events.

Radio: Mrs. Schlafly's 3-minutes-a-day 5-days-a-week radio commentaries (running since 1983) are heard daily on 460 stations, and her radio talk show on education called "Phyllis Schlafly Live" (running since 1989) is heard weekly on Saturdays on 45 stations. Both series can be heard on Eagle Forum's website: www.eagleforum.org. Mrs. Schlafly's radio career began in the 1970s when she was a regular semi-weekly CBS commentator on the Spectrum series (1973-1978), and for WBBM Chicago (1973-1975). For four years in the 1960s, she was the speaker on a 15-minute weekly statewide radio program sponsored by the Illinois Daughters of the American Revolution.

Television: Mrs. Schlafly did weekly television commentaries on the CBS Morning News, 1974-1975, and on CNN, 1980-83. She has also written and produced several documentary videos on such issues as American inventors, education, and treaties. She has appeared on almost every network news and public affairs program.

Legal: Mrs. Schlafly is an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Illinois, Missouri, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Supreme Court. She served (with the late Chief Justice Warren Burger) as a member of the Commission on the Bicentennial of the U.S. Constitution, 1985-1991, appointed by President Reagan. She has testified before more than 50 Congressional and State Legislative committees on constitutional, national defense, foreign policy, education, tax, encryption, and family issues. She served five terms as a member of the Illinois Commission on the Status of Women, 1975-1985, appointed by the Illinois Legislature. She served as a member of the Administrative Conference of the United States, 1983-1986. She has filed several amicus curiae briefs with the U.S. Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal.

Education: Mrs. Schlafly received her B.A. from Washington University in St. Louis in 1944 (Phi Beta Kappa, Pi Sigma Alpha, Final Honors). She worked her way through college on the night shift at the St. Louis Ordnance Plant testing ammunition by firing rifles and machine guns and as a laboratory technician investigating misfires. She received her Master's in Government from Harvard University in 1945. She received her J.D. from Washington University Law School in 1978.

Family: Mrs. Schlafly was the 1992 Illinois Mother of the Year. She and her late husband of 44 years are the parents of six children (John, Bruce, Roger, Liza, Andrew, and Anne) and 14 grandchildren. She taught all her children to read before they entered school and all had outstanding academic success: three lawyers, one physician, one Ph.D. mathematician, and one businesswoman.

Political Activism: In a ten-year battle, Mrs. Schlafly led the pro-family movement to victory over the principal legislative goal of the radical feminists, called the Equal Rights Amendment. She assembled the movement called Stop ERA. She is America's most articulate and successful opponent of the radical feminist movement. She has appeared on virtually every national television and radio talk show and has lectured or debated on more than 500 college and university campuses. Other political battles she led and won defeating the national movement in the 1980s to call a new Constitutional Convention.

Republican: Mrs. Schlafly's lifetime hobby has been politics, starting with working as campaign manager for a successful Republican candidate for Congress in St. Louis in 1946. She has served as an elected Delegate to six Republican National Conventions: 1956, 1964, 1968, 1984, 1988, 1992; and as an elected Alternate Delegate to three other Republican National Conventions: 1960, 1980, and 2000. She has attended and played an active role in every Republican National Convention since 1952. Her 1964 book A Choice Not an Echo is a history of Republican National Conventions. She was three times elected President of the Illinois Federation of Republican Women, 1960-64, and was elected First Vice President, National Federation of Republican Women (1964-1967). She was a candidate for Congress from Illinois in 1952 and in 1970, in two different districts. She received numerous awards for volunteer service to the Republican Party.

DAR: Phyllis Schlafly served five terms as National Chairman of National Defense for the National Society, Daughters of the American Revolution (1977- 80, 1983-95). Previously, she served as National Chairman of American History Month (1965-68) and as National Chairman of the Bicentennial Committee (1967-70). A DAR member of Ninian Edwards Chapter in Alton, Illinois since the 1950s, she served two terms as Chapter Regent and is now Honorary Chapter Regent. She served two terms as Illinois State Chairman of National Defense and one term as Illinois State Recording Secretary and Editor of the State Yearbook.

Awards: Mrs. Schlafly has received numerous awards for service in a variety of fields. Honorary LL.D. from Niagara University. Honorary Doctor of Christian Letters from Franciscan University of Steubenville. Ten honor awards from Freedoms Foundation of Valley Forge. Brotherhood Award from the National Conference of Christians and Jews (1975). National patriot awards from both the Sons of the Revolution and the Sons of the American Revolution. She was named one of the Ten Most Admired Women in the World in the Good Housekeeping poll, 1977-1990. The World Almanac named her one of the 25 Most Influential Women in America during the years 1978-1985. When Richard Amberg, publisher of St. Louis Globe-Democrat, presented her with the Women of Achievement Award in 1963, he said:

"Phyllis Schlafly stands for everything that has made America great and for those things which will keep it that way."

President Ronald Reagan gave Phyllis Schlafly, a lifetime fulltime volunteer in public policymaking, this tribute at a national meeting in 1984:

"Eagle Forum has set a high standard of volunteer participation in the political and legislative process. . . . You've been out front on so many of the most important issues of our time. . . . Your work is an example to all those who would struggle for an America that is prosperous and free. . . . Our nation needs the kind of dedicated individual volunteer service you and Eagle Forum have demonstrated over the last 20 years."

The economist George Gilder wrote in his book Men & Marriage (Pelican, 1987):

"When the histories of this era are seriously written, Phyllis Schlafly will take her place among the tiny number of leaders who made a decisive and permanent difference. She changed the political landscape of her country. In fact, by the measure of the odds she faced and overcame, Schlafly's achievement excels all the others'. . . . She won in part because she is one of the country's best speakers and debaters and its best pamphleteer since Tom Paine. She won because of her indefatigable energy and will power, mobilizing women in state after state."

Joseph Lelyveld wrote in the New York Times Magazine (April 17, 1977):  

"Phyllis Schlafly has become one of the most relentless and accomplished platform debaters of any gender to be found on any side of any issue."


Howlin


"I told my husband to make his own damn dinner and I started a 'Live' thread!"


656 posted on 01/31/2006 5:12:56 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat
How long will it be before their higher birth rates produce a majority population capable of dominating elections and therefore policies ...

Patience. And the policies are designed to buy the votes.

657 posted on 01/31/2006 5:13:03 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
The plans proposed so far by people in your camp will not happen--ever.

Not even enforcing exiting statutes?

658 posted on 01/31/2006 5:14:22 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]

To: jla

Well, no wonder you're always wrong. You don't know what you're talking about.


659 posted on 01/31/2006 5:14:54 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"But you cannot speak for ALL that 30 percent, can you?"

No, but contacts (modest though they are) along with everything I read and hear, points to a level of disengagement that I believe is unprecedented in recent times. Few would deny that it is very serious.

" In fact, most of US consider ourselves conservatives, too, although you look down your nose at us."

All I can go by is the posting history of specific FReepers. Some reflect posters who are loyal American conservatives while others indicate someone who may claim to be a conservative but whose posts fall into the GOP Big Tent party-above-principle category. I respect the former and have nothing but contempt for the latter because there are few principles they will not sacrifice in order to record an (R) "win". They may be compromisers but they are not conservatives.

"And you need to face the fact that you need US more than we need you."

I don't think that's how it plays, but lets hope things get fixed before we have to find out who need whom the most.

660 posted on 01/31/2006 5:17:07 PM PST by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 721-735 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson