Posted on 01/30/2006 9:16:41 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
WASHINGTON, Jan. 30 The week before his Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. e-mailed the text of his opening statement to the White House. It included very little about his legal thinking, dwelled at length on his family and opened with a tired and rambling joke about courtroom banter between a lawyer and a judge.
The response from the White House: "Perfect, don't change a word," according to an administration official who was granted anonymity because Judge Alito's preparation sessions were confidential.
As the last obstacles to confirmation faded away Monday, Democratic aides said their party had initially expected Judge Alito to live up to his reputation as "Scalito," suggesting a conservative firebrand in the mold of Justice Antonin Scalia. Failing to adjust to his meekness, Democratic aides admit they searched too hard for scandal in Judge Alito's past.
The White House, meanwhile, sought to take advantage of Judge Alito's low-key, almost shy demeanor to build sympathy for him. They say they succeeded beyond all expectations when Judge Alito's wife, Martha-Ann, walked out in tears from his confirmation hearings.
"Any time they are yelling, preaching, lecturing, and you are cool and calm and breathing deep, you are winning," the administration official said the White House team told Judge Alito. "What that means on television sets where the American people are watching this is, you look good and they look bad. It was the central operating premise."
Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senator Harry Reid
of Nevada, the Democratic leader, agreed. "It was a classic rope-a-dope," Mr. Manley said, referring to the boxing tactic of leaning against the ropes to let an opponent exhaust himself punching.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Wife noted that also, said his aids went from bewildered confusion, to the most angry looking people she ever saw.
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004412.htm
video and more here.
I'll look at all that tomorrow....nite all!
"We Won...They Lost!!!"
With this one, they keep on losing, as long as the Justice lives.
Reading the angst in this NY Slimes "report", I experienced a deep sense of schadenfreude.
LOL!
The NYTimes and libs don't get it. Judge Alito was a great candidate. That's why he's being confirmed, not because Mrs. Alito was driven to tears. The NYTimes, Kennedy, and Kerry look like idiots. Hat Trick! (A little hockey lingo.)
So, you mean, our guys are smarter than the guys on the other side? Wow, who would have thought a simpleton like our president could have outsmarted the Left?
Again!
P;ease don't insult a great John Ford movie and a greater Frank O'Connor book by associating either with the Chappaquidick car service.
Good point.
I thought the old boy was going to pop a blood vessel in his head.
It's all they've got left. They will slam him and demonize him for his entire time on the SCOTUS bench, just like they do with Clarence Thomas.
No not in the Constitution
One Supreme Court
The Convention left up to Congress decision on the size and composition of the Supreme Court, the time and place for sitting, its internal organization, save for the reference to the Chief Justice in the impeachment provision, and other matters. These details Congress filled up in the Judiciary Act of 1789, one of the seminal statutes of the United States. By the Act, the Court was made to consist of a Chief Justice and five Associate Justices. The number was gradually increased until it reached a total of ten under the act of March 3, 1863. As one of the Reconstruction Congress' restrictions on President Andrew Johnson, the number was reduced to seven as vacancies should occur. The number actually never fell below eight before the end of Johnson's term, and Congress there upon made the number nine.
LOL... good one.
(D)umbozoS
Thank you. That really means a lot. Many of the MSM sites take several minutes to DL @ 56K.
Glad I could help.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.