Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RonDog

"Both were wearing body armor, helmets and ballistic glasses at the time of the bombing. "

DU has been claiming the body armor is inadequate. Hmmm. More fodder for the MSM.


549 posted on 01/29/2006 2:56:55 PM PST by lawdude (LIEberals/socialists make up facts and history as they go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies ]


To: lawdude
"Both were wearing body armor, helmets and ballistic glasses at the time of the bombing. "
As I understand it, VEHICLE armor is better that BODY armor. :o)

From www.casperstartribune.net:

...They were wearing body armor and helmets but were standing up in the hatch of the mechanized vehicle when the device exploded, exposing them to shrapnel.

555 posted on 01/29/2006 3:23:54 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson