Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Faster space engine stingy on fuel (new ion engine)
News in Science ^ | Thursday, 26 January 2006 | Anna Salleh

Posted on 01/26/2006 5:58:39 PM PST by saganite

A new ion engine that promises to propel spacecraft faster and further is four times more fuel efficient than the best available, scientists say.

They say the results of recent tests suggest the engine, the Dual Stage Four Grid Thruster (DS4G), would reduce the time for craft to reach Mars or Pluto and beyond.

Dr Orson Sutherland and team at the Australian National University's Space Plasma Power and Propulsion Group designed and built the engine with the European Space Agency (ESA).

Sutherland says laboratory tests show the DS4G it is four times more fuel efficient than the best ion engines available and 10 times more fuel efficient than used to propel ESA's SMART-1 Moon mission.

"The underlying technology has been around for 40 years," he says. "All we did with the DS4G is to add some extra components which basically gave it a 10-fold improvement."

Sutherland says missions to Pluto and the Kuiper Belt would be "quite easily" made, with trips out beyond the solar system also more feasible.

"All of that within the working lifetime of a mission scientist," he says.

Another option is the new engine could help take heavier missions to shorter distances such as the Moon or Mars.

How it works

A standard ion engine works by using electrodes to extract ions from plasma, in this case heated xenon gas.

The ions are focused into beams that accelerate through tiny holes in the electrodes and thrust metres out into space, propelling the spacecraft in the opposite direction.

The standard engine has only three electrodes, capable of generating up to 5000 volts between them.

Anything greater than this would cause the ion beams to miss the holes in the electrodes and hit the metal, destroying the electrodes and causing less efficient thrusting.

Sutherland found a way to add another electrode to the system and boost voltage up to 30,000 volts without the ion beams hitting the electrodes. He says, given enough power, it would be possible to generate 70,000 volts over the electrodes.

He says the bigger the voltage, the faster the ions in the beam accelerate, and the more efficient the propulsion.

ESA reports tests on DS4G produced an ion exhaust plume that travelled at 210,000 metres per second.

Trend towards ion propulsion

Sutherland says that over the past 10 years such ion propulsion thrusters have become more popular because they provide constant propulsion for a spacecraft.

By contrast, he says, conventional chemical thrusters, which rely on ballistics to get the spacecraft on the right path, give the spacecraft "one big kick" and then rely on it to coast along in space until it slows down.

Ion propulsion also means mission scientists can bettr control a spacecraft's steering, says Sutherland, compared to the one-off chemical thruster.

Nuclear powered?

Sutherland says the ion engine needs megawatts of power to generate the necessary voltage across the electrodes and to generate the ion-providing plasma.

"This particular thruster has high performance but the cost of that high performance is it requires more power to run," he says.

He says standard photovoltaic cells, as used on the SMART-1 mission, would not be adequate and an on-board power system would be required.

This would be necessary anyway if the engine was to propel a spacecraft into deep space where there is little available light, he says.

"People are talking about CTRs - controlled thermonuclear reactors - small plutonium chunks like, for example, the power system that just went up on the NASA mission to Pluto."

The DS4G, which was funded by ESA's Advanced Concepts Team, will undergo more testing before industry partners are sought for a mission, says Sutherland, who estimates this process will take at least 10 years.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: ionengine; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 01/26/2006 5:58:40 PM PST by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: saganite

ESA reports tests on DS4G produced an ion exhaust plume that travelled at 210,000 metres per second. >>

If they can get an exhaust plume that travelled at 186,000 miles per second, THEN we'll be getting somewhere!


2 posted on 01/26/2006 6:02:27 PM PST by Appalled but Not Surprised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
[Sutherland says laboratory tests show the DS4G it is four times more fuel efficient than the best ion engines available and 10 times more fuel efficient than used to propel ESA's SMART-1 Moon mission.]


As soon as they get that FluxCapacitor fluxing again then we'll really be in business.
3 posted on 01/26/2006 6:05:28 PM PST by spinestein (All journalists today are paid advocates for someone's agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Appalled but Not Surprised

Unfortunately, that would require an infinite amount of energy. Give me a Heim drive instead!!


4 posted on 01/26/2006 6:05:54 PM PST by sigSEGV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Appalled but Not Surprised

From the Science Fiction of my youth.


5 posted on 01/26/2006 6:07:39 PM PST by Nasty McPhilthy (Those who beat their swords into plow shears….will plow for those who don’t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Looks like the legendary flux capacitor...

6 posted on 01/26/2006 6:10:17 PM PST by xcamel (Exposing clandestine operations is treason. 13 knots make a noose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

ping


7 posted on 01/26/2006 6:14:14 PM PST by Sam Cree (absolute reality) - ("Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...

8 posted on 01/26/2006 6:16:24 PM PST by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sigSEGV

Unfortunately, that would require an infinite amount of energy.>>

Not at all. My flashlight has a photonic exhaust plume that does exactly that, and it runs off of a couple of D batteries. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be moving very quickly....


9 posted on 01/26/2006 6:16:27 PM PST by Appalled but Not Surprised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Appalled but Not Surprised
If they can get an exhaust plume that travelled at 186,000 miles per second, THEN we'll be getting somewhere!

No problem. Where'd I put that flashlight?

10 posted on 01/26/2006 6:28:14 PM PST by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Sutherland says the ion engine needs megawatts of power to generate the necessary voltage across the electrodes and to generate the ion-providing plasma.

Marty: This is uh, this is heavy duty, Doc, this is great. Uh, does it run on regular unleaded gasoline?

Doc: Unfortunately, no! It requires something with a little more kick -- plutonium.

Marty: Uh? plutonium?? Wait a minute, are you telling me that this sucker is nuclear?!

Doc: Hey, hey, keep rolling, keep rolling there. No, no, no! This sucker's electrical. But I need a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity that I need.

Marty: Doc - you don't just walk into a store and ask for plutonium. Did you rip that off?

Doc: Of course! From a group of Libyan Nationalists. They wanted me to build them a bomb. So I took their plutonium and in turn gave them a shiny bomb case full of used pinball machine parts.

11 posted on 01/26/2006 6:32:27 PM PST by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

My '91 Toyota Previa gets 22 mpg!


12 posted on 01/26/2006 6:38:32 PM PST by Carl LaFong ("I take care of the place while the master is away")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong

I am really bad at math, but if I am correct now, that is 471,000 mph.
Could someone a little more talented at arithmetic please verify?


13 posted on 01/26/2006 6:40:33 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

Er...no ...I've only hit 87mph in the Previa (downhill).


14 posted on 01/26/2006 6:51:25 PM PST by Carl LaFong ("I take care of the place while the master is away")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn
469756.6213 MPH- You were pretty close, but it's way below light speed. 210,000 meters per second equates to 130.4879504 miles per second.

I canna' only give ya' impulse, Cap'n.

15 posted on 01/26/2006 6:54:12 PM PST by Sarajevo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn
I am really bad at math, but if I am correct now, that is 471,000 mph.
Could someone a little more talented at arithmetic please verify?

To four significant figures: 1,217,000 mph

16 posted on 01/26/2006 7:11:58 PM PST by stripes1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn
I am really bad at math, but if I am correct now, that is 471,000 mph. Could someone a little more talented at arithmetic please verify?

Sorry for the wrong figures in the post. (It does make a difference what you put in the numerator and denomerator!) You are correct. 469,800 mph to 4 significant figures.

17 posted on 01/26/2006 7:18:11 PM PST by stripes1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: saganite

A lot of hype on this engine.


18 posted on 01/26/2006 7:22:24 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Could also be the Oscillation Overthruster.

Useless Factoid: The flux capacitor from the BTTF series was the oscillation overthruster from Buckaroo Banzai - Beyond the 8th Dimension. It has also appeared on various Star Trek episodes and Babylon 5 to name a few.


19 posted on 01/26/2006 7:53:08 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

Oops... ACROSS the 8th dimension!


20 posted on 01/26/2006 7:55:16 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson