Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD: Day ONE - Senate debate on nomination of Samuel Alito to SCOTUS: C-span 2; 9:30 am EST
C-span

Posted on 01/25/2006 5:46:02 AM PST by ken5050

Good morning once again, all you fellow political junkies. Put on a fresh pot of coffee, put the sticky buns in the oven, put a fresh battery in the remote control, and join us for the latest episode of the world's greatest daytime soap opera, "As the Democrats Bloviate." Yup, once again, it's that time...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitovote; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 2,361-2,366 next last
To: Bahbah

I think "Harriet Miers" should be the drink word(s) of the day. ... Arlen just said it !


161 posted on 01/25/2006 7:42:52 AM PST by Mayflower Sister (DEMOCRAT: THE PARTY OF COWARDS AND TRAITORS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: KE; Cboldt

FYI..see #152..


162 posted on 01/25/2006 7:43:03 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Good article and though I would like to see this vote happen earlier..after the State of the Union will be fine..Just getting him in is the victory. I just cannot abide listening to the posturing of the dims..I may turn on Animal Planet!


163 posted on 01/25/2006 7:43:07 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
"Specter thinks that Senators hold power over Supreme Court justices AFTER they are confirmed."

What did he say? After he went on a rant about televising Supreme Court proceedings, I took my attention to the Snow show.

164 posted on 01/25/2006 7:43:54 AM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: KE
according to Senate rules, once Frist files for cloture, he has to wait three days ...

"The following day but one" is the cloture vote, and the rule provides for 30 hours of debate (no more than that, except by unanimous consent) following passage of the motion.

165 posted on 01/25/2006 7:44:07 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

For the next few days, C-span 2 IS animal planet !


166 posted on 01/25/2006 7:44:20 AM PST by Mayflower Sister (DEMOCRAT: THE PARTY OF COWARDS AND TRAITORS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
I may turn on Animal Planet!

In search of more intelligent life?
167 posted on 01/25/2006 7:44:30 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Mayflower Sister
I think "Harriet Miers" should be the drink word(s) of the day.

I'll second that.

168 posted on 01/25/2006 7:44:43 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I concur with your analysis..but I think he brings thiem in over the weekend..to punish them..unless there is a rule, as cboldt suggests, that doesn't allow weeekend days to cout against the cloture timeline..BTW..see #152 this thread..


169 posted on 01/25/2006 7:44:47 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: KE

#163 was to you..I goofed!


170 posted on 01/25/2006 7:45:45 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

What Specter said was that it was important for Senators on both sides of the abortion issue to vote for him so he doesn't feel beholden to one side when he is confirmed to the bench. I am still shaking my head over that one.


171 posted on 01/25/2006 7:46:15 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Mayflower Sister; rightwingintelligentsia

;)


172 posted on 01/25/2006 7:46:54 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Mayflower Sister

No, this will be all Senators, all the time.


173 posted on 01/25/2006 7:49:57 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Mayflower Sister
Will Justice Alito be present to answer questions during the Senate hearings or will it just be constant blow-viating by the senators.

The nominee won't appear on the floor of the Senate. There is precedent (Thomas) for additional Committee hearings following sending the nomination to the full Senate. I would not be surprised if the DEMs attempt that stunt again, given their past sucess with Anita Hill. They won't get their way this time. Welcome is worn out.

174 posted on 01/25/2006 7:50:27 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

RE:

"The American people are lucky to have me there. They get two for the price of one."


+++++

Thanks for the thread, ken.

Do you find it surprising that just momentary pauses on a TV channel or radio station often reveal the core of the presentation. Is it ESP, serendipity or compulsive media-monitoring? I have often wondered about that as it seems to happen too frequently to be a random occurence. Am I putting myself in the compulsive category?


175 posted on 01/25/2006 7:51:05 AM PST by maica (We are fighting the War for the Free World. Democrats and the media are not on our side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Meg, thanks for the help with the link.

Choldt, What does ""The following day but one" is the cloture vote" mean?

Also, the other day I read the vote may be delayed due to the fact that some in the Senate are going overseas to some summit, and debating over the week-end won't fit in with their schedule. I can't find the article though.

Karen

176 posted on 01/25/2006 7:51:10 AM PST by KE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Well this is goofy. Specter thinks that Senators hold power over Supreme Court justices AFTER they are confirmed. They have all gone insane.

Technically speaking, a justice can be impeached, emphasis on "can."

177 posted on 01/25/2006 7:51:37 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

I believe Sessions gently corrected him when he pointed out that SCJudges don't have to campaign and run for office.


178 posted on 01/25/2006 7:51:58 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
"What Specter said was that it was important for Senators on both sides of the abortion issue to vote for him so he doesn't feel beholden to one side when he is confirmed to the bench."

That may well be Arlen's legislative philosophy, but it shows complete ignorance of the separation of powers concept.

179 posted on 01/25/2006 7:52:20 AM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
I wouldn't exactly call Anita Hill a success.
180 posted on 01/25/2006 7:53:17 AM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 2,361-2,366 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson