To: NRA2BFree
... This makes me wonder if their bunkers are really strong enough to withstand our bunker buster bombs...
You can't play around with conventional weapons when the stakes are so high. It will take nukes to get a decent kill probability.
46 posted on
01/22/2006 10:53:03 AM PST by
fallujah-nuker
(America needs more SAC and less empty sacs.)
To: fallujah-nuker
To: fallujah-nuker
"You can't play around with conventional weapons when the stakes are so high. It will take nukes to get a decent kill probability.
"
No nuclear weapons are needed, nor will any be used. Get over it. Your apparent glee at seeing nuclear weapons in use is misplaced.
63 posted on
01/22/2006 10:58:21 AM PST by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: fallujah-nuker
If they go for it with nukes, might as well hit Mecca as well.
It just might be worth testing the "Our God is Greater" theory of muslim faith.
70 posted on
01/22/2006 10:59:34 AM PST by
TASMANIANRED
(Democrats value the privacy of terrorists higher than the lives of Americans.)
To: fallujah-nuker
"You can't play around with conventional weapons when the stakes are so high. It will take nukes to get a decent kill probability"Nukes aren't required to destroy a nuclear reactor.
126 posted on
01/22/2006 11:16:37 AM PST by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: One Wing to Rule them All and to the Darkside Bind them)
To: fallujah-nuker
You can't play around with conventional weapons when the stakes are so high. It will take nukes to get a decent kill probability. An electromagnetic pulse bomb or two may be in the works as well. I doubt that Iran's military has hardened all of the electrical devices associated with their military assets. In addition, the use of E-Bombs could cripple Iran for many years, and take them out of play indefinitely. Nothing would work. Cars, watches, radios, etc.
To: fallujah-nuker
Why would you even make a suggestion like that? A nuclear device should stay being used in the manner it was developed for. Last defensive option. Conventional bombs could take out the plant and soften up the defences around, allowing us to acquire any devices that could have survived, and possibly would have left the children alive.
253 posted on
01/22/2006 12:27:36 PM PST by
benjibrowder
(The government (at all levels) should not be involved in the education business.)
To: fallujah-nuker
You can't play around with conventional weapons when the stakes are so high. It will take nukes to get a decent kill probability. Do we have nuclear bunker busters?
To: fallujah-nuker
You really believe we're going to use nukes to stop them from getting nukes?
Get real.
453 posted on
01/23/2006 6:46:05 PM PST by
Finalapproach29er
(Americans need to remember Osama's "strong horse" -"weak horse" analogy. Let's stop acting weak.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson