Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay 'marriage' ban struck
The Washington Times ^ | January 21, 2006 | S. A. Miller

Posted on 01/21/2006 8:23:11 PM PST by MediaAnalyst

BALTIMORE -- A Circuit Court judge yesterday ruled that Maryland's 33-year-old ban on same-sex "marriage" is unconstitutional.

- snip -

"After much study and serious reflection, this court holds that Maryland's statutory prohibition against same-sex marriage cannot withstand this constitutional challenge," Judge Murdock said in her 22-page ruling. The law defining marriage as a union of a man and a woman violates the state constitution's Equal Rights Amendment, which guarantees "equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged or denied because of sex," the judge said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: bigsigh; gay; homosexualagenda; homotrollsonfr; marriage; paulcjesup; pervertperverts; perverts; pervertspervert; ruling; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-255 next last
To: bigsigh

Your transparent attempt to pretend that homosexuals raising children and homosexual marriage [sic] have nothing to do with each other is just that - transparent.

Please explain how your support of judicial fiat shoving "gay" marriage down the peoples' throats against their will is freedom.


181 posted on 01/22/2006 7:38:08 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh
"my, my the anti-freedom, anti-liberty, anti-pursuit of happeness ping list is waking up. And they're playing the mod card because they can't win on the merits."

Why would you think that you have the freedom and liberty to wave your queer flag here?

Nobody want to debate the finer points of your queer lifestyle.

Why be the turd in the punch bowl? There are other websites that welcome you views.

The DUck room is just down the hall, to the left>>>>>>>>>>>>
182 posted on 01/22/2006 7:42:05 PM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K; bigsigh

This is from bigsigh/breakem's profile page:

"If you really must know, I value freedom, pursuit of happeness, and small government."

Funny how he says he is for small government yet wants a big nanny state government to force the homosexual agenda on an unwilling citizenry.


183 posted on 01/22/2006 7:42:07 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh

He wasn't calling for the end of debate, but for the ejection of a left wing homo activist troll... not that I necessarily agree in totality with him, but you are scum...

You are proven wrong as a matter of law and biology... but still you lie...


184 posted on 01/22/2006 7:42:42 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Actually it's you who supports big government. When an action is prohibited by government it is the conservative position for the government to explain the need, not the other way around.

You keep saying someone is shoving something down your throat. I'm sorry for your weakness. You really need to keep your mouth shut and that won't happen. When someone gets married they are not shoving anything down your throat. THEY are getting married and it's none of your business.

You can keep referring to the agenda all you want. It's not what I'm supporting. Perhaps you'll read my previous post. I'm quite capable of explaing what I support regardless of your propaganda tatics and ignoring what I've told you repeatedly.

I was a conservative before you were born and I don't surrender the definition to some one like you who has an agenda to deny the rights of others.

185 posted on 01/22/2006 7:43:23 PM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

The granting of rights is not big government. It is the reduction of governmental control and the advocacy of liberty. You have a very convoluted view of the role of government: to enforce your sexual and religious virews upon others.


186 posted on 01/22/2006 7:44:58 PM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
EXACTLY.

I see his leftist partner in crime Paul.CJesup decided to plead the fifth..LMAO

187 posted on 01/22/2006 7:45:32 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (Silence is a good fence for wisdom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

I form my position on my values not on who agrees and disagrees with them. I suppose if Susan Sarandon supported Bush on Iraq, you'd oppose him. Try thinking for yourself.


188 posted on 01/22/2006 7:46:28 PM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
However, this is just my opinion. I again state my opinion and refer the 'debate' which I also oppose to the moderator as only the moderator can put an end to the 'debate'..."

We can believe you or our lying eyes. LOL! When the sun is up is it light out? Not if dash says that it isn't and posts the appropriate quote from some dead Greeks.

189 posted on 01/22/2006 7:49:26 PM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh

There has never been, in this country or any other, the right of one man to marry another man or a woman to marry another woman. Homosexual activists and their supporters (people with twisted morality like yourself) are trying to - now listen carefully - CHANGE THE EXISTING LAW AND MORAL ORDER.

You are trying to revolutionize and change the very meaning of "family" and "marriage". Why? So that people who are psychologically and mentally ill can play house and pretend that having sodomy with someone of the same sex is the same as marriage. To the detriment of themselves, society and who knows how many children.

The only way any "gay" rights have made inroads is through judicial acitivism and some wayward legislatures, but primarily through rogue power mad judges.

If you are in favor of small goverment, you would be in favor of different localities allowing or prohibiting homosexuals from getting married. To each his own, right? But no, you want the homosexual agenda to trump the desires and viewpoints of the vast majority of the population. Not exactly "freedom" in my book.


190 posted on 01/22/2006 7:50:49 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh

You just don't get it, do you? You don't belong here spouting humanist manifesto talking points, carrying water for the DNC in support of a perversion that is eating away the soul of this nation, and calling it "conservatism."


191 posted on 01/22/2006 7:54:15 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Rights are not IN this country and they are not subject to majority vote.

Closing report.

What have we learned:

People will say you have a twisted morality because you support individual liberty.

Homosexuals can't have babies.

People who support gay marruage support NAMBLA (The extreme homosexual agenda).

When in doubt, call the mod, call your posse, attack, but don't support basic amercian values.

I've had enough ladies and gentlemen. Play with each other for awhile.

192 posted on 01/22/2006 7:54:24 PM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh

Are you out of your cotton picking mind? You are saying that small government means that 2% of the population and their enforcers such as yourself should force the majority of the population to accept homosexual marriage against their will.

You want the very definition and meaning of marriage and family to change to "free for all sodomy". And the only way that can happen is by judicial activism and power mad government.

And you're the small government fellow who loves freedom?


193 posted on 01/22/2006 7:54:24 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh

Buh Bye! Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

BTW, a lot more homosexuals support NAMBLA than heterosexuals - what part of Man Boy do you not get?


194 posted on 01/22/2006 7:55:54 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

No one is forcing you to accept anything. Don't accept it. The question is why is it prohibited by law. You don't understand the basic meaning of freedom do you. Now good-bye maybe the mod will come along and make you feel better about us evil doers.


195 posted on 01/22/2006 7:56:46 PM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh

Why don't you do us and you a favor and stay away permanently. You don't belong here.


196 posted on 01/22/2006 7:57:51 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I knew you'd play the child molest card. Last refuge of a scoundrel. Pathetic. And you call yourself moral. Your continuing mischaracterization of my position is immoral because you know it to be a lie.


197 posted on 01/22/2006 7:58:55 PM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

That's obvious. Look at the company one keeps to be on this thread. Now come tuck me in!


198 posted on 01/22/2006 7:59:35 PM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh
I've had enough ladies and gentlemen. Play with each other for awhile.

How predictable. Shine the light of truth and the perversion advocates slink back into the darkness where they belong. Good riddance. Now run over to Clownposse.org and flap your gums with the rest of your disgruntled banned libertarian ex-freeper trolls.

199 posted on 01/22/2006 8:02:27 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (Silence is a good fence for wisdom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh
"Third, if your fiancee asks you to wear a dress, cancel the wedding."

...and fourth, get a Supreme Court and lower courts in place that will get your hands out of my children's schools. Regardless of whatever desires you and the MSM have, we are about to clean your ^## when the Senate does its confirmation this week.

By the way, don't go to Europe, once the Muzzies take power, they will string you guys up so fast, you won't know what hit you.
200 posted on 01/22/2006 8:03:15 PM PST by MediaAnalyst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-255 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson