Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT: In Preview of G.O.P. Campaign, Rove Tears Into Democrats
New York Times ^ | January 20, 2006 | ADAM NAGOURNEY

Posted on 01/20/2006 3:19:18 PM PST by West Coast Conservative

Karl Rove, the president's chief political adviser, gave nervous Republicans here a preview of the party's strategy to maintain its dominance in the fall elections today, assailing Democrats for their positions on terrorism, the White House eavesdropping program and Mr. Bush's attempt to shape the federal judiciary.

For 26 minutes, after calling for civility in politics in a packed speech before the Republican National Committee, Mr. Rove offered a lacerating attack on Democrats that other Republicans said was a road map for how the party would deal with a tough electoral environment. Mr. Rove sharply criticized Democrats for their opposition to tax cuts and Mr. Bush's Supreme Court nominations, but he left little doubt that once again - as has been the case in both national elections since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks - that he was intent on making national security the pre-eminent issue in 2006.

Mr. Rove speeches this early in an election year have proved to be accurate predictors of what Republican candidates would say in the fall, and thus every seat in the ballroom at a downtown Washington hotel was filled. He lacerated Democrats for what he described their "cut and run" policy on Iraq, for blocking a renewal of the broad antiterrorism law known as the USA Patriot Act, and for challenging the legality of the administration's widespread use of warrantless wiretaps in the face of widespread criticism.

Mr. Rove made no mention of Republican opposition to both the Patriot Act and the surveillance program, which has posed a political problem for this White House, while he laid out his case against the Democrats, speaking rapidly.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2006agenda; 2006election; bush; congress; democrat; gopstrategy; republican; rove
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: West Coast Conservative; Howlin

"Diebold/Halliburton 2008!"

THAT Dynamic Duo could choose to either elect OR appoint itself!


MUAHAHAHAHA!


41 posted on 01/20/2006 4:01:53 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: fisherman90814
yawn, who are you going to vote for? hillary!

You guys are so transparent.

42 posted on 01/20/2006 4:04:49 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Wasanother

Rove criticized the Rats but he didn't "tear" into them. He said that they are no less patriotic because they are wrong on the war on terrorism.


Face it, Democrats = treason.


43 posted on 01/20/2006 4:06:16 PM PST by Pittsburg Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

ROFL! Thanx for the laugh! We love that show!


44 posted on 01/20/2006 4:07:03 PM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (Rock beats scissors, don't run with rocks. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Wasanother
You missed his point!

He also said that they (the demonRATS) were "not our enemy". The reason he stated it that way is to make them appear to be the "nattering nabobs of negativism", while he (the Republicans) remain above that and on the high ethical/moral ground. I am an admirer of Mr. Rove for he is a seasoned practitioner of the art of damning with subtlety.

45 posted on 01/20/2006 4:09:22 PM PST by doctorhugo (Concerned Citizen and Proud Navy Vet...Damn the torpedoes, ALL AHEAD FLANK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
Rove is not an elected politician, he's a "civilian". The proper journalistic standard is to call him Mr. Rove.

That's what the news reporters are attempting to do, constantly refer to President Bush using the standard properly applied to those who are unelected.
46 posted on 01/20/2006 4:13:04 PM PST by spinestein (The King of Media is dead. Long live The King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Unfortunately it is now a standard democrat tactic to try to demoralize GOP supporters with phony polls, insincere predictions, and even an apparently rigged exit poll on election day 2004. The democrat party has been shaped and molded by the Clintons, and of course honesty and truth are a very low priority for the Clintons. We have to always keep this in mind: no information from the democrats or the MSM can be trusted without verification. Everything they say now has to be fact-checked and verified so that we don't fall into the trap of being demoralized by false information. On a more positive note, this also gives us an opportunity to further replace the MSM as the source of news for the American people.


47 posted on 01/20/2006 4:15:15 PM PST by carl in alaska (Kerry did not invent treason, but he invented the use of treason as a democrat political strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
Rove/North in '08.

Sounds like a slogan for the Alaskan Tourism Board.

48 posted on 01/20/2006 4:20:42 PM PST by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I get the feeling the NY Times is losing readers...and fast.


49 posted on 01/20/2006 4:22:13 PM PST by defenderSD (¤¤ In a battle of wits against a FReeper, the typical liberal is unarmed. ¤¤)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
The first time Karl Rove is referred to in the story it's with his full name and civilian title:

[Karl Rove, the president's chief political adviser, gave...]


In subsequent times he is referred to properly as "Mr. Rove":

[Mr. Rove offered...]


Contrast this with the way President Bush is referred to in his first appearance in the story:

[Mr. Bush's attempt...]

and in subsequent appearances:

[Mr. Bush's Supreme Court nominations,...]






This may sound like a nitpick of details, but the objectivity of good journalism depends on following the standards rigorously, and this is an example of a basic standard taught even to high school journalism students that "real" journalists should be ashamed to violate.

Today's news reporters routinely violate many of the basic standards of good journalism because they no longer have objectivity as the highest priority. The highest priority today is advocacy.
50 posted on 01/20/2006 4:26:03 PM PST by spinestein (The King of Media is dead. Long live The King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
"nervous Republicans"

WTH!!! Damn spineless idiots!! Grow some walnuts and squash the RATS!!
51 posted on 01/20/2006 4:26:05 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

The web cast is on www.c-span.org His speech starts 1:16:19 into the program. I'm home alone and found myself clapping a couple times.


52 posted on 01/20/2006 4:26:20 PM PST by TheHound (You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

Don't you love how the NYT's thinks it can hide it's bias? You get no further than two sentences into the story and you can tell their passing kidney stones over Rove.


53 posted on 01/20/2006 4:28:35 PM PST by ALWAYSWELDING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: spinestein
The highest priority today is advocacy.

And laziness.

54 posted on 01/20/2006 4:32:36 PM PST by JennysCool (Non-Y2K-Compliant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

"Rove/North in '08". I LOVE IT!


55 posted on 01/20/2006 4:48:47 PM PST by maxwellp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

I like that ticket!


56 posted on 01/20/2006 4:49:45 PM PST by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
What happened to "lashes out!"?

That's what Republicans usually do when accused of being racists and homophobes.

57 posted on 01/20/2006 4:52:03 PM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Seems like the "architect" has the NYT nervous.

Wonderful news.


58 posted on 01/20/2006 4:52:09 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Too tame still. Savage/Rove in 2008.


59 posted on 01/20/2006 5:03:37 PM PST by gotribe (Hillary: Accessory to Rape)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
Allen/Rice in '08 with Rove as campaign coordinator and Coulter as chief speech writer!

I second that. Better get started printing up the bumper stickers.
60 posted on 01/20/2006 5:04:44 PM PST by Hoodat ( Silly Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson