Skip to comments.
REDACTION LOOPHOLE: ACCESS TO THE BARRETT REPORT
Barrett report, CSPAN, Robert Novak
| 1.20.06
| Mia T
Posted on 01/20/2006 1:47:53 AM PST by Mia T
REDACTION LOOPHOLE: ACCESS TO THE BARRETT REPORT
- by Mia T, 01.20.06
he judges who ostensibly redacted 120 pages of the Barrett report established a means by which the American people can see those redactions: Any member of Congress can legally request access to the redactions and can publish them..
The serious '"culture of corruption" in the clinton DOJ and IRS that is detailed by the report makes one wonder about the nature of the crimes and abuse that the clintons felt compelled to redact.
Even a small subset of what we do know about the redactions argues for their immediate disclosure by Congress. (Only in the surreal world of the clintons would someone suggest with a straight face that disclosure of the crime of obstruction of justice is precluded by privacy considerations.)
We know that clinton pettifoggers labored mightily and long to gut and bury this report with some 140 motions, sleights of hand... and, when necessary, the clintons' heavy hand.
We know that charges of the clintons' retaliatory IRS audits of both their political foes and their victims of rape and predation are said to be included in the redacted material.
The mutual protection racket writ large is apparently alive and well in DC. (Is Filegate rearing its ugly head yet again?)
We mustn't let Congress get away with this coverup. Call. E-mail. Fax. Don't let up.
And remember the responses on Election Day.
|
deconstructing clinton
"just because I could"
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!
-
|
December 7, 1941+64
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Dear Concerned Americans,
Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.
We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?
In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?
Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.
What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.
COMPLETE LETTER
December 7, 1941+64 Mia T AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
|
|
-
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: audit; barrettreport; bill; broaddrick; clinton; clintons; cultureofcorruption; hillary; irs; rape; retaliatoryaudit; willey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-131 next last
To: B4Ranch
What are they hiding, and why?
I wonder if there is even one Congressman who cares, let alone 200.
61
posted on
01/20/2006 11:06:09 AM PST
by
planekT
(<- http://www.wadejacoby.com/pedro/ ->)
To: B4Ranch
bump.
The term 'members of Congress' includes senators. ANY SENATOR CAN PUBLISH THE REDACTIONS
We must vote out the professional politician. The citizen-politician is what the founders had in mind....
Those who can, do. Those who can't but lust for power and glory, become professional politicians.
62
posted on
01/20/2006 11:30:47 AM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: B4Ranch
63
posted on
01/20/2006 11:33:20 AM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: planekT
"What are they hiding, and why?"
They are hiding the fact that we do not have a two party system in our government today. Legislators are deceitfully following the (renamed) New World Order Plan that goes all the way back to the League of Nations.
Continually decreasing the size of our military, bases and number of personel is the most obvious of this. Our national park system is under the control of the United Nations. Then we have Agenda 21 on top of that.
The most difficult of all is trying to get American citizens/taxpayers/voters to see the obvious. I love the way FReepers jump all over the New York Times and the MSM when the truth is right in front of their noses!
FDR warned us that nothing happens in government or economics that isnt planned.
What luck for the rulers that men do not think. ~~Adolf Hitler
Let me put my blinders back on and finish my coffee.
64
posted on
01/20/2006 11:36:58 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
(No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
To: planekT
65
posted on
01/20/2006 11:39:48 AM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
"We must vote out the professional politician."
Politicians are a 'Me first' group, statesmen are "My country first" crowd, yet we continually elect politicians? Keep electing politicians and we won't even have a sovereign country pretty soon.
America has the corrupt government that the frightened, lazy people deserve. Being too lazy to protest or even vote has predetermined the crumbling of our nation.
Nothing happens in government without the support of the people.
66
posted on
01/20/2006 11:43:55 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
(No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
To: thoughtomator
"Is there one single member of Congress out of the entire 535 that is loyal enough to the American people that he will see this released in full?"
Too bad Traficant is in prison -- I bet he would!
67
posted on
01/20/2006 11:57:29 AM PST
by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: Jim Robinson
JR
Do you have anything to say about this BARRETT REPORT redaction?
Are you going to advise the Bush bots to stay hidden or protest and defeat Hillary today?
Now is good a chance to show that you are the courageous leader everyone says you are. Come on, bring the FReepers together and let's kick some ass while we have the club to do it with!
68
posted on
01/20/2006 11:59:51 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
(No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
To: thoughtomator
69
posted on
01/20/2006 1:15:56 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Mia T
This is the reason we must get rid of the careerist and replace him with the citizen-politician.Amen, Mia T! Thanks for the information. Surely there is one who can stand for truth. Come on, FR, let's put the pressure on. Our money paid for this report.
70
posted on
01/20/2006 1:44:50 PM PST
by
Faith
To: thoughtomator
My theory that the two parties are better friends to each other than either one is to the American people will have an excellent test in this one. My theory is that since we have dirt on their side and they have dirt on our side, if both sides keep the secrets both sides will continue to live their lives of privilege and we will continue to pick up the tab.
71
posted on
01/20/2006 1:55:18 PM PST
by
oldbrowser
(No matter how cynical I get, I can't seem to keep up)
To: ovrtaxt
To: LegendHasIt
I have in my bill in-box a plea from RNC for money...thanks for the idea...when you get some Congress Critter to release the full Barrett report then I will release some funds to you... BTW...I knew Dave Barrett years ago as a whore lawyer peddling influence in Washington...whored our group to the tune of 20 grand if memory serves me correctly.....but we did get to lift our legs with the big dogs at the 84 Republican convention in Dallas at the Mansion on Turtle Creek...WOW..was that money well spent or what!!
73
posted on
01/20/2006 2:17:46 PM PST
by
RVN Airplane Driver
(Most Americans are so spoiled with freedom they have no idea what it takes to earn and keep it.)
To: RVN Airplane Driver
I just put up a file that prints three of the pseudo-bills on a single sheet of paper. A pretty high quality graphic, lots better than the posted .jpg. It will print out really nice.
Go to my FR profile for a link to the file if you (all) want to download it.
To: oldbrowser
bump. the solution, therefore, is to vote out all careerists.
Careerists = entrenched power by definition
75
posted on
01/20/2006 2:43:38 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: thoughtomator
Any doubt about the truth of it?Gee, let's ask Sandy Berger for the answer.
76
posted on
01/20/2006 2:46:50 PM PST
by
NeoCaveman
("You should move the team Art" - then Governor Voinovich)
To: All
CORRECTIONS + ADDITIONS
REDACTION LOOPHOLE: ACCESS TO THE BARRETT REPORT
- by Mia T, 01.20.06
he judges who redacted 120 pages of the Barrett report have, if not a sense of justice, a sense of humor. In their rulings, they provide a mechanism by which the people can see the redactions, but for which at least one honest, selfless, courageous member of Congress is required.
The way it works: Any member of Congress can see the redactions simply by requesting access, and, unlike Barrett, can publish the redactions "without fear of legal sanction."1 The serious '"culture of corruption" in the clinton DOJ and IRS detailed by the Barrett report makes one wonder about the nature of the crimes and abuse that the clintons felt compelled to redact. Even a small subset of what we do know about the redactions argues for their immediate disclosure by Congress. (Only in the surreal world of the clintons would someone suggest with a straight face that disclosure of the crime of obstruction of justice is precluded by privacy considerations.) We know that clinton pettifoggers labored mightily and long to gut and bury this report with some 140 motions, assorted sleights of hand... and, whenever necessary, the clintons' heavy hand. We know that charges of retaliatory IRS audits of both the clintons' political foes and the clintons' victims of rape and predation are said to be included in the redacted material. The mutual protection racket writ large is apparently alive and well in DC. (Is Filegate rearing its ugly head yet again?) We mustn't let Congress get away with this coverup. Call. E-mail. Fax. Don't let up. And remember the responses. On Election Day.
- The Barrett report, Robert Novak, Jan 19, 2006
|
deconstructing clinton
"just because I could"
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!
-
|
December 7, 1941+64
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Dear Concerned Americans,
Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive. We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will? In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst? Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival. What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times. COMPLETE LETTER
December 7, 1941+64 Mia T AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
|
|
-
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
77
posted on
01/20/2006 4:36:45 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Faith
78
posted on
01/20/2006 4:54:44 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: ovrtaxt
79
posted on
01/20/2006 6:17:06 PM PST
by
auboy
To: UWSrepublican
80
posted on
01/20/2006 6:40:44 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson