Skip to comments.
"Intelligent design" not science: Vatican paper
Reuters via Yahoo! ^
| 01/19/06
| Tom Heneghan
Posted on 01/19/2006 1:33:32 PM PST by peyton randolph
PARIS (Reuters) - The Roman Catholic Church has restated its support for evolution with an article praising a U.S. court decision that rejects the "intelligent design" theory as non-scientific.
The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano said that teaching intelligent design -- which argues that life is so complex that it needed a supernatural creator -- alongside Darwin's theory of evolution would only cause confusion...
A court in the state of Pennsylvania last month barred a school from teaching intelligent design (ID), a blow to Christian conservatives who want it to be taught in biology classes along with the Darwinism they oppose.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: catholic; creationisminadress; dover; fsm; id; idiocy; idisjunkscience; ignoranceisstrength; science; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 601-606 next last
How interesting.
To: peyton randolph
How weird is it that the best way to be sure your kids get a good science education is to send them to Catholic school?
2
posted on
01/19/2006 1:34:51 PM PST
by
kenboy
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: peyton randolph
Counting down for the first Catholic-bashing post. 1...2...3
4
posted on
01/19/2006 1:35:23 PM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: PatrickHenry
5
posted on
01/19/2006 1:35:46 PM PST
by
peyton randolph
(As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
To: peyton randolph
Maybe a supernatural creator was the first one to come up with evolution, and Darwin just figured out a small part of what the creator was doing.
6
posted on
01/19/2006 1:36:13 PM PST
by
linear
(Restore Federalism - Repeal the 17th Amendment)
To: flashbunny
When did this become a Howard Dean thread?
7
posted on
01/19/2006 1:36:45 PM PST
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: linear
"Maybe a supernatural creator was the first one to come up with evolution, and Darwin just figured out a small part of what the creator was doing."
That's what a lot of Christians believe, including the Pope, I think. Stick around, though...this will be an interesting thread.
8
posted on
01/19/2006 1:37:17 PM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: flashbunny
I hope that's not a self-portrait.
9
posted on
01/19/2006 1:37:47 PM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: peyton randolph
"Intelligent design" not scienceNeither is "evolution".
11
posted on
01/19/2006 1:38:57 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: MineralMan
Threads about hotly debated but ultimately unprovable concepts are always interesting. lol
12
posted on
01/19/2006 1:39:33 PM PST
by
linear
(Restore Federalism - Repeal the 17th Amendment)
To: MineralMan
no, just anticipating what will happen to many people here when they read this article.
13
posted on
01/19/2006 1:40:14 PM PST
by
flashbunny
(Are you annoying ME? Are you annoying ME? You must be annoying me, since there's no one else here!)
To: MineralMan
Counting down for the first Catholic-bashing post. 1...2...3
Shouldn't that be 3....2....1 if you're counting down?
I hope that the rest of your "science" isn't backwards as well...
To: peyton randolph
The entire evolution vs ID debate is an aberration caused by the fact that freedom of speech, or any other kind of freedom, has been eliminated in government schools.
ID was invented as a way of combatting the fact that public schools have become little more than Demo(n)cRAT indoctrination camps.
15
posted on
01/19/2006 1:40:38 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
To: peyton randolph
"Intelligent design" not scienceI don't need the Vatican to tell me that ID isn't science...or anything else about science.
16
posted on
01/19/2006 1:40:51 PM PST
by
ElectricStrawberry
(27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years....Nec Aspera Terrent!!!)
To: onedoug
uh, yes it is. Perhaps you should look up exactly what 'science' is.
17
posted on
01/19/2006 1:40:55 PM PST
by
flashbunny
(Are you annoying ME? Are you annoying ME? You must be annoying me, since there's no one else here!)
To: Javelina
"I learned very young that the Catholic Church accepted evolution. Is this new?"
No, it's not new. Most of the traditional Christian churches do the same. I was taught that evolution was how the deity created species in the Presbyterian church as a youngster.
However, many of the latter-day evangelical churches are sola scriptura and reject evolution.
18
posted on
01/19/2006 1:40:59 PM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Javelina
Really? I was born a Catholic and spent many childhood years in the church. I never knew this. Guess I missed that lesson in Catechism.
To: flashbunny
Ah, it appears that your image is no more on the thread. Pity.
20
posted on
01/19/2006 1:41:45 PM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 601-606 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson